Ratio- and predator-dependent functional forms for predators optimally foraging in patches

American Naturalist

Volumn 175, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 240-249

  Anderson, James J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Functional form; Optimal foraging; Patch leaving criteria; Predator dependent; Predator prey; Ratio dependent

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FOOD WEB; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; MODEL TEST; OPTIMUM FORAGING THEORY; PATCH DYNAMICS; PREDATION; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FOOD CHAIN; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATION;

ANIMALS; FOOD CHAIN; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR;

EID: 76249112072     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/649606     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Abrams, P. A. 1994. The fallacies of "ratio-dependent" predation. Ecology 75:1842-1850.
2. -. 1997. Anomalous predictions of ratio-dependent models of predation. Oikos 80:163-171.
3. -. 2007. Habitat choice in predator-prey systems: spatial instability due to interacting adaptive movements. American Naturalist 169:581-594.
4. -. 2008. Measuring the impact of dynamic antipredator traits on predator-prey-resource interactions. Ecology 89:1640-1649.
5. Abrams, P. A., and L. R. Ginzburg. 2000. The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15:337-341.
6. Abrams, P. A., R. Cressman, and V. Křivan. 2007. The role of behavioral dynamics in determining the patch distributions of interacting species. American Naturalist 169:505-518.
7. Addicott, J. F., J. M. Aho, M. F. Antolin, D. L. Padilla, J. S. Richardson, and D. A. Soluk. 1987. Ecological neighborhoods: scaling environmental patterns. Oikos 49:340-346.
8. Anderson, J. J., E. Gurarie, and R. W. Zabel. 2005. Mean free-path length theory of predator-prey interactions: applications to juvenile salmon migration. Ecological Modelling 186:196-211.
9. Arditi, R., and L. R. Ginzburg. 1989. Coupling in predator prey dynamics: ratio-dependence. Journal of Theoretical Biology 139: 311-326.
10. Arditi,R.,andH.Saïah.1992. Empiricalevidenceoftheroleofheterogeneityinratio-dependentconsumption.Ecology73: 1544-1551.(Pubitemid23396425)
11. Beddington, J. R. 1975. Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency. Journal of Animal Ecology 44:331-340.
12. Berryman, A. A. 1992. The origins and revolution of predator-prey theory. Ecology 73:1530-1535.
13. Brown, J. S., and N. P. Kotier. 2004. Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of prédation. Ecology Letters 7:999-1014.
14. Charnov, E. L. 1976. Optimal foraging: the marginal value theorem. Theoretical Population Biology 9:129-136.
15. Cosner, C., D. L. DeAngelis, J. S. Ault, and D. B. Olson. 1999. Effects of spatial grouping on the functional response of predators. Theoretical Population Biology 56:65-75. (Pubitemid 29395865)
16. Cressman, R., V. Křivan, and J. Garay. 2004. Ideal free distributions, evolutionary games, and population dynamics in multiple-species environments. American Naturalist 164:473-489. (Pubitemid 39385107)
17. DeAngelis, D. L., and J. N. Holland. 2006. Emergence of ratio-dependent and predator-dependent functional responses for pollination mutualism and seed parasitism. Ecological Modelling 19: 551-556.
18. DeAngelis, D. L., R. A. Goldstein, and R. V. O'Neill. 1975. A model for trophic interactions. Ecology 56:881-892.
19. Domenici, P., R. S. Batty, and T. Similä 2000. Spacing of wild schooling herring while encircled by killer whales. Journal of Fish Biology 57:831-836. (Pubitemid 30729661)
20. Fagan, W. F., R. S. Cantrell, and C. Cosner. 1999. How habitat edges change species interactions. American Naturalist 153:165-182.
21. Fretwell, D. S., and H. L. Lucas. 1970. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheoretica 19:16-32.
22. Fryxell, J. M., A. Mosser, A. R. E. Sinclair, and C. Packer. 2007. Group formation stabilizes predator-prey dynamics. Nature 449:1041-1043.
23. Hassell, M. P. 1978. The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
24. Holling, C. S. 1959. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small mammal predation of the European pine sawfly. Canadian Entomologist 91:293-320.
25. Houston, A. L, and J. M. McNamara. 1999. Models of adaptive behavior: an approach based on state. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
26. Hutchinson, J. M. C., and P. M. Waser. 2007. Use, misuse and extensions of "ideal gas" models of animal encounter. Biological Reviews 82:335-359.
27. Iwasa, Y., M. Higashi, and N. Yamamura. 1981. Prey distribution as a factor determining the choice of optimal foraging strategy. American Naturalist 117:710-723.
28. Jensen, C. X. J., and L. R. Ginzburg. 2005. Paradoxes or theoretical failures? the jury is still out. Ecological Modelling 188:3-14. (Pubitemid 41414626)
29. Jost,C.2000.Predator-preytheory:hiddentwinsinecologyandmicrobiology. Oikos90:202-208.(Pubitemid30613298)
30. Křivan, V., and E. Sirot. 2002. Habitat selection by two competing species in a two-habitat environment. American Naturalist 160: 214-234. (Pubitemid 34805520)
31. Křivan, V., and I. Vrkoč. 2004. Should "handled" prey be considered? some consequences for functional responses, predator-prey dynamics and optimal foraging theory. Journal of Theoretical Biology 227:167-174. (Pubitemid 38281147)
32. Lotka, A. J. 1925. Elements of physical biology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.
33. McNamara, J. 1982. Optimal patch use in a stochastic environment. Theoretical Population Biology 21:269-288.
34. Niwa, H. S. 2005. Power-law scaling in dimension-to-biomass relationship offish schools. Journal of Theoretical Biology 235:419-430.
35. Okuyama, T. 2009. Local interactions between predators and prey call into question commonly used functional responses. Ecological Modelling 220:1182-1188.
36. Pitcher, T. P. 1986. The behavior of teleost fishes. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
37. Rosenzweig, M. L. 1971. Paradox of enrichment: destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time. Science 171:385-387.
38. Ruxton, G. D., and W. S. C. Gurney. 1992. The interpretation of tests for radio-dependence. Oikos 65:334-335.
39. Skalski, G. T., and J. F. Gilliam. 2001. Functional responses with predator interference: viable alternatives to the Holling type II model. Ecology 82:3083-3092.
40. Slobodkin, L. B. 1992. A summary of the special feature and comments on its theoretical context and importance. Ecology 73:1564-1566.
41. Soria, M., P. Freon, and P. Chabanet. 2007. Schooling properties of an obligate and a facultative fish species. Journal of Fish Biology 71:1257-1269. (Pubitemid 47623914)
42. Waage, J. K. 1977. Behavioral aspects of foraging in the parasitoid Nemeritis canescens (Grav.). PhD thesis. University of London.
43. Willis, J. 2008. Simulation model of universal law of school size distribution applied to southern bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoyii) in the Great Australian Bight. Ecological Modelling 213:33-44.