Experimental model of the formation of pelvic adhesions by videolaparoscopic in female rabbits

Acta Cirurgica Brasileira

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 34-36

  Balbinotto, Rosi Pereira ^a   Trindade, Manoel Roberto Maciel ^a,b   Muller, Ana Lucia Letti ^a   Nunes, André Gorgen ^b   Da Silva, Rodrigo ^b   Meyer, Fabíola Schons ^a   Cerski, Carlos Thadeu Schmidt ^b  

^a HOSPITAL DE CLÍNICAS DE PORTO ALEGRE   (Brazil)

^b UFRS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Adhesions; Laparoscopy; Rabbits; Surgery

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GRANULATION TISSUE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; NONHUMAN; PELVIC GIRDLE; RABBIT; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; WOUND HEALING; ANIMAL; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY; PATHOLOGY; PERITONEAL DISEASES; THEORETICAL MODEL; TISSUE ADHESIONS;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; LAPAROSCOPY; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PERITONEAL DISEASES; RABBITS; TISSUE ADHESIONS; VIDEO-ASSISTED SURGERY;

EID: 76149140486     PISSN: 01028650     EISSN: 16782674     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0102-86502010000100009     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Young P, Johns A, Templeman C, Witz C, Webster B, Ferland R, Diamond MP, Block K, diZerega, G. Reduction of postoperative adhesions after laparoscopic gynecological surgery with Oxiplex/AP Gel: a pilot study. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(5):1450-6.
2. Farquhar C, Vandekerckhouse P, Watson A, Vail A, Wiseman D. Barrier agents for preventing adhesions after surgery for subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000475.
3. Sutton C. Adhesions and their prevention. Roy Coll Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;7:168-76.
4. Parker W. Uterino myomas: management. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(2):255-71.
5. Gutt C, Oniu T, Schemmer P, Mehrabi A, Büchler MW. Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:898-906.
6. Garrard C, Clements RH, Nanney L, Davidson JM, Richards WO. Adhesion formation is reduced after laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:10-3.
7. Luciano A, Maier DB, Koch EI, Nulsen JC, Whitman GF. A Comparative study of postoperative adhesions following laser surgery by laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the rabbit model. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;74(2):220-4.
8. Rosa Junior A, Trindade MRM, Shemes TF, Tavares WC. Influência da abordagem cirúrgica (videolaparoscopia versus laparotomia) na gestação de coelhas prenhes. Acta Cir Bras. 2003;18(4):337-41.
9. Parker J, Sinaii N, Segars JH, Godoy H, Winkel C, Stratton P. Adhesion formation after laparoscopic excision of endometriosis and lysis of adhesions. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(5):1457-61.
10. Ahmad G, Duffy JM, Farquhar C, Vail A, Vandekerckhove P, Watson A, Wiseman D. Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(2):CD000475.
11. Diamond M, Daniel JF, Martin DC, Feste J, Vaughn WK, Mclaughlin DS. Tubal patency and pelvid adhesions at early second-look laparoscopy following intraabdominal use of the carbon dioxide laser: initial report of the intraabdominal laser study group. Fertil Steril. 1984;42:717-23.
12. Johns A. Evidence-based prevention of post-operative adhesions. Hum Reprod. 2001;7(6):577-9.
13. Ordoñez J, Domínguez J, Evrard V, Koninckx PR. The effect of training and duration of surgery on adhesion formation in the rabbit model. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(12):2654-7.
14. Binda M, Molinas CR, Hansen P, Koninckx PR. Effect of desiccation and temperature during laparoscopy on adhesion formation in mice. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(1):166-75.