Intrametropolitan location of business establishments: Microanalytical model for Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2133, 2009, Pages 33-45

  Maoh, Hanna ^a   Kanaroglou, Pavlos ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; LOCATION; POPULATION STATISTICS;

CHOICE BEHAVIORS; CHOICE THEORY; ESTIMATION RESULTS; HAMILTONS; LOCATION CHOICE; MULTINOMIAL LOGIT MODEL; ONTARIO; PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS; SIMILAR ANALYSIS; SYSTEM INFORMATION;

LAND USE;

EID: 76149132286     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2133-04     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Kanaroglou, P., and D. Scott. Integrated Urban Transportation and Land-Use Models for Policy Analysis. In Governing Cities on the Move: Functional and Management Perspectives on Transformations of Urban Infrastructure in European Agglomerations (M. Dijst, ed.), Ashgate, Aldershot, United Kingdom, 2002, pp. 43-75.
2. Wegener, M. Overview of Land Use Transport Models. In Handbook of Transport Geography and Spatial Systems (D. Hensher, K. Button, K. Haynes, and P. Stopher, eds.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2004, pp. 127-146.
3. Hunt, J., D. Kriger, and E. Miller. Current Operational Urban Land-Use- Transport Modelling Frameworks: A Review. Transport Reviews, Vol.25, 2005, pp. 329-376.
4. Miller, E., J. Hunt, J. Abraham, and P. Salvini. Microsimulating Urban Systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol.28, 2004, pp. 9-44.
5. Maoh, H., and P. Kanaroglou. Business Establishment Mobility Behavior in Urban Areas: A Microanalytical Model for the City of Hamilton in Ontario, Canada. Journal of Geographical Systems, Vol.9, No.3, 2007, pp. 229-252.
6. Van Wissen, L. A Micro-Simulation Model of Firms: Applications of Concepts of the Demography of the Firm. Papers in Regional Science, Vol.79, 2000, pp. 111-134.
7. Hunt, J., J. Khan, and J. Abraham. Microsimulating Firm Spatial Behavior. Proc., 8th International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, Sendai, Japan, 2003.
8. Waddell, P., A. Borning, M. Noth, N. Freier, M. Becke, and G. Ullfarsson. Microsimulation of Urban Development and Location Choices: Design and Implementation of UrbanSim. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol.3, 2003, pp. 43-67.
9. Maoh, H. Modeling Firm Demography in Urban Areas with an Application to Hamilton, Ontario: Towards an Agent-Based Microsimulation Model. PhD thesis. McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, 2005.
10. Bliemer, M. C. J., and M. De Bok. Infrastructure and Firm Dynamics: Calibration of Micosimulation Model for Firms in the Netherlands. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.1977, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 132-144.
11. Elgar, I., and E. J. Miller. Conceptual Model of Location of Small Office Firms. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.1977, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 190-196.
12. Moeckel, R. Microsimulation of Firm Location Decision. Proc., 9th International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, London, England, 2005.
13. Kumar, S., and K. M. Kockelman. Tracking Size, Location, and Interactions of Businesses: Microsimulation of Firm Behavior in Austin, Texas. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.2077, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 113-121.
14. Alonso, W. Location and Land Use: Towards a General Theory of Land Rent. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1964.
15. Ellickson, B. An Alternative Test of the Hedonic Theory of Housing Market. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol.9, 1981, pp. 56-80.
16. Lee, K. A Model of Intraurban Employment Location: An Application to Bogota, Colombia. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol.12, 1982, pp. 263-279.
17. Hansen, E. Industrial Location Choice in Sao Paulo, Brazil: A Nested Logit Model. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol.17, 1987, pp. 89-108.
18. Shukla, V., and P. Waddell. Firm Location and Land Use in Discrete Urban Space: A Study of the Spatial Structure of Dallas-Fort Worth. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol.21, 1991, pp. 225-253.
19. Martinez, F. The Bid-Choice Land Use Model: An Integrated Economic Framework. Environment and Planning A, Vol.24, 1992, pp. 871-885.
20. Waddell, P., and V. Shukla. Manufacturing Location in a Polycentric Urban Area: A Study in the Composition and Attractiveness of Employment Subcenters. Urban Geography, Vol.14, 1993, pp. 277-296.
21. Coffey, W., R. Drolet, and M. Polese. The Intrametropolitan Location of High Order Services: Patterns, Factors and Mobility in Montreal. Papers in Regional Science, Vol.75, 1996, pp. 293-323.
22. Yarish, M. The Intrametropolitan Location of New Office Firms in Metropolitan Toronto. M.A. dissertation. School of Geography and Geology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, 1998.
23. Hunt, J. D. Stated-Preference Examination of Location Choice Behavior of Small Retail Firms. In Transportation Research Record 1606, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 25-32.
24. Wu, F. Intrametropolitan FDI firm location in Guangzhou, China: A Poisson and Negative Binomial Analysis. Annals of Regional Science, Vol.33, 1999, pp. 535-555.
25. De Bok, M., and F. Sanders. Firm Relocation and Accessibility of Locations: Empirical Results from the Netherlands. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.1902, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 35-43.
26. Simmons, J., and M. Yeates. Toronto: Commercial Structure and Change. Progress in Planning, Vol.50, 1998, pp. 253-272.
27. Jones, K., S. Kamikihara, and J. Simmons. Dallas-Fort Worth: Commercial Structure and Change. Progress in Planning, Vol.50, 1998, pp. 273-289.
28. Frenkel, A. Why High Technology Firms Choose to Locate in or Near Metropolitan Areas. Urban Studies, Vol.38, 2001, pp. 1083-1102.
29. Martinez, F. MUSSA: Land Use Model for Santiago City. In Transportation Research Record 1552, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 126-134.
30. Maoh, H., and P. Kanaroglou. Geographic Clustering of Firms and Urban Form: A Multivariate Analysis. Journal of Geographical Systems, Vol.9, 2007, pp. 29-52.
31. Bracken, I., and D. Martin. The Generation of Spatial Population Distribution From Census Centroid Data. Environment and Planning A, Vol.21, 1989, pp. 537-543.
32. Barff, R. Industrial Clustering and the Organization of Production: A Point Pattern Analysis of Manufacturing in Cincinnati, Ohio. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol.77, 1987, pp. 89-103.
33. Allison, P. Comparing Logit and Probit Coefficients Across Groups. Sociological Methods and Research, Vol.28, No.2, 1999, pp. 186-208.