Determination of lead and cadmium in seawater by differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetry: Fit-for-purpose partial validation and internal quality aspects

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

Volumn 392, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 277-286

  Bisetty, K ^a   Gumede, N J ^a   Escuder Gilabert, L ^b   Sagrado, S ^b  

^a DURBAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Accuracy assessment; Fit for purpose validation; Heavy metals; Internal quality; Quality control; Seawater; Uncertainty; Voltammetry

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ANALYTES; ANODIC STRIPPING VOLTAMMETRY; CONCENTRATION LEVELS; DIFFERENTIAL PULSE ANODIC STRIPPING VOLTAMMETRY; FIT-FOR-PURPOSE VALIDATION; INTERNAL QUALITY; MARINE WATERS; METHOD VALIDATIONS; MONTE CARLO SIMULATION; PRE-VALIDATION; SAMPLE UNCERTAINTY; STEP-BY-STEP; UNCERTAINTY;

CADMIUM; CHEMICALS REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT); COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEATURE EXTRACTION; HEAVY METALS; LEAD; MONTE CARLO METHODS; RATING; SEAWATER; VOLTAMMETRY;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 76149121079     PISSN: 16182642     EISSN: 16182650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-008-2235-1     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Clement RE, Eiceman GA, Koester CJ (1995) Anal Chem 67:221-225
2. Buffle J, Tercier-Waeber ML (2005) Trends Anal Chem 24:172-191
3. Legeai S, Soropogui K, Cretinon M, Vittori O, Hereen De Oliviera A, Barbier F, Grenier-Loustalot MF (2005) Anal Bioanal Chem 383:839-847
4. Koester CJ, Moulik A (2005) Anal Chem 77:3737-3754
5. Koester CJ, Simonich SL, Esser BK (2003) Anal Chem 75:2813-2829
6. Bersier PM, Howell J, Craig Bruntlett C (1994) Analyst 119:219-232
7. Worsforold PJ, Achterberg EP, Bowie AR, Sandford RC, Mantoura R F C (2000) Ocean Sci Technol 1:71-94
8. Achterberg EP, Braungardt C, Whitworth DJ (2000) Ocean Sci Technol 1:227-247
9. Achterberg EP, Braungardt C (1999) Anal Chim Acta 400:381-397
10. Locatelli C, Torsi G (2001) J Electroanal Chem 509:80-89
11. EURACHEM/CITAC (1998) Fitness for purpose of analytical methods: a laboratory guide to method validation and related topics. http://www.eurachem. org/guides/valid.pdf, accessed March 2008
12. ISO (2005) ISO/IEC 17025:2005: General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. ISO, Geneva
13. Sagrado S, Bonet E, Medina MJ, Martín Y (2005) Manual Práctico de Calidad en los Laboratorios, Enfoque ISO 17025, 2nd ed. AENOR, Madrid
14. Bonet-Domingo E, Escuder-Gilabert L, Medina-Hernández MJ, Sagrado S (2006) Anal Chem 78:8113-8120
15. Escuder-Gilabert L, Bonet-Domingo E, Medina-Hernández MJ, Sagrado S (2007) Anal Bioanal Chem 387:619-625
16. The MathWorks (2008) MATLAB. The Mathworks, Natick, MA. http://www.mathworks.com/products/product-listing/index.html, accessed March 2008
17. US EPA (2008) GLI guidelines: water quality criteria documents for the protection of aquatic life in ambient water (EPA-822-R-01-001, 65FR31682). http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/wqcriteria.html, accessed March 2008
18. Codex Alimentarius Commission, Committee on Methods of Analysis and Sampling (2001) Agenda item 4a: Criteria for evaluating acceptable methods of analysis for Codex purposes. CX/MAS 01/04, 23rd session, Budapest, Hungary, 4-8 April 2005. ftp://ftp.fao.org/codex/ccmas26/ma26-05e.pdf, accessed March 2008
19. Prichard E (1995) Quality in the analytical laboratory (ACOL series). Wiley, Chichester, UK
20. AOAC International (2000) Method validation programs (OMA/PMV Department) including Appendix D: Guidelines for collaborative study procedures to validate characteristics of a method of analysis. http://www.aoac.org/vmeth/devmethno. htm, accessed March 2008
21. Maroto A, Riu J, Boqué R, Rius FX (1999) Anal Chim Acta 391:173-185
22. Boulanger B, Chiap P, Dewé W, Crommen J, Hubert Ph (2003) J Pharm Biomed Anal 32:753-765
23. Hund E, Massart DL, Smeyers-Verbeke J (2001) Trends Anal Chem 8:394-406