Profile of live-born infants of in-vitro fertilisation

Medical Journal Armed Forces India

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 18-21

  Narayan, S ^a   Rana, K S ^b   Sharma, M ^b   Sharma, R K ^b   Talwar, P ^b   Kapur, K ^b   Goyal, B K ^b  

^a Paediatrics and Neonatology   (India)

^b ARMY HOSPITAL RESEARCH AND REFERRAL   (India)

Author keywords

In vitro fertilisation; Live births; Low birth weight

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; LIVE BIRTH; LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATERNAL DISEASE; NEWBORN; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; PREMATURITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SMALL FOR DATE INFANT; SURVIVAL RATE; TWIN PREGNANCY; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

EID: 76149119448     PISSN: 03771237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0377-1237(10)80085-1     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Koivurova S, Hartikainen AL, Sovio U, Gissler M, Hemminki E, Jarvelin MR. Growth, psychomotor development and morbidity up to three years of age in children born after IVF. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 2328-36.
2. Hansen M, Bower C, Milne E, Klerk N, Kurinczuk JJ. Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects: A systematic review. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 328-38.
3. Anthony S, Buitendijk SE, Dorrepaal CA, Lindner K, Braat DDM, den Ouden AL. Congenital malformations in 4224 children conceived after IVF. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 2089-95.
4. Ercison A, Kallen B. Congenital malformations in infants born after IVF: a population-based study. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 504-9.
5. Stromberg B, Dahlquist G, Ericson A, Finnstrom O, Koster M, Stjernqvist K. Neurological sequelae in children born after invitro fertilisation: a population-based study. Lancet 2002; 359: 461-5.
6. Adamson GD, Mouzon J, Lancaster P, Nygren KG, Sullivan E, Zegers-Hochschild F. World collaborative report on in vitro fertilisation, 2000. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 1586-622.
7. Society for Assisted reproductive Technology and American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2002). Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States: 1998 results generated from American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertil Steril 2002; 77: 18-31.
8. Poikkeus P, Gissler M, Unkila-Kallio L, Hyden-Granskog C, Tiitinen A. Obstetric and neonatal outcome after single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 1073-9.
9. Westergaard HB, Tranberg-Johansen AM, Erb K, Anderson AN. Danish National In-Vitro Fertilisation Registry 1994 and 1995: A controlled study of births, malformations and cytogenetic findings. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 1896-902.
10. D'Souza SW, Rivlin E, Cadman J, Richards B, Buck P, Lieberman BA. Children conceived by in vitro fertilisation after fresh embryo transfer. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1997; 76: 70-4.
11. Rizk B, Doyle P, Tan SL, Rainsbury P, Betts J, Brinsden P, et al. Perinatal outcome and congenital malformations in in-vitro fertilisation babies from the Bourn-Hallam group. Hum Reprod 1991; 6: 1259-64.
12. Reynolds MA, Schieve LA, Martin JA, Jeng G, Macaluso M. Trends in multiple births conceived using assisted reproductive technology, United States, 1997-2000. Paediatrics 2003; 111: 1159-62.
13. Templeton A, Morris JK. Reducing the risk of multiple births by transfer of two embryos after in-vitro fertilisation. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 573-7.
14. Reefhuis J, Honein MA, Schieve LA, Correa A, Hobbs CA, Rasmussen SA. The National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Hum Reprod 2009; 24: 360-6.
15. Koudstaal J. Braat DDM, Bruinse HW, Naaktgeboren N, Vermeiden JPW, Visser GHA. Obstetric outcome of singleton pregnancies after IVF: a matched control study in four Dutch university hospitals. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 1819-25.
16. Hansen M, Colvin L, Petterson B, Kruinczuk JJ, de Klerk N, Bower C. Admission to hospital of singleton children following assisted reproductive technology (ART). Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 1297-305.