The spatial MCDA approach for evaluating flood damage reduction alternatives

KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 359-369

  Lim, Kwang Suop ^a   Lee, Dong Ryul ^a  

^a Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology   (South Korea)

Author keywords

CP; Flood damage; GIS; MCDA; SCP; Spatial approach

Indexed keywords

CP; DECISION MAKERS; DECISION MAKING PROCESS; FLOOD PLAINS; FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS; RIVER BASINS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS; SPATIAL VARIABILITY; TECHNICAL SPECIALISTS;

BANKS (BODIES OF WATER); DECISION THEORY; FLOOD CONTROL; FLOOD DAMAGE; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 76149105229     PISSN: 12267988     EISSN: 19763808     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-009-0359-2     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bedient, P. B. and Huber, W. C. (2002). Hydrology and floodplain analysis, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
2. District, S. C. V. W. (2002). "Coyote watershed stream stewardship plan - Executive summary." Santa Clara Valley Water District, URL: http://cf. valleywater. org/_wmi/Related_report/index. cfm.
3. Fontane, D. G. (2003). Water resources systems analysis, Class Lecture Note for CE546, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
4. Goicoechea, A., Hansen, D. R., and Duckstein, L. (1982). Multiobjective decision analysis with engineering and business applications, Wiley, New York, N. Y.
5. Kenevissi, F. (2007). Multi-criteria decision making, Newcastle Engineering Design Centre, Newcastle University Newcastle, UK.
6. Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis, J. Wiley & Sons, New York, N. Y.
7. MOCT. (2001). The improvement method for economic of water control plan, Ministry of Construction & Transportation, Korea (in Korean).
8. Nirupama and Simonovic, S. S. (2002). A spatial fuzzy compromise approach for flood disaster management, The Institute of Catastrophic Loss Reduction, London, Ontario.
9. Queensland, T. S. O. (2002). Guidance on the assessment of tangible flood damages, The State of Queensland (Dept. of Natural Resources and Mines); QNRM02081, Australia.
10. Romero, C. and Rehman, T. (2003). Multiple criteria analysis for agricultural decisions, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Boston.
11. Simonovic, S. P. and Bender, M. J. (1996). "Collaborative planning-support system: an approach for determining evaluation criteria." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 177, Issues 3-4, pp. 237-251.
12. Simonovic, S. S. (2002). A spatial fuzzy compromise programming for management of natural disasters, The Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction (ICLR), Paper Series No. 24, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.
13. Tkach, R. J. and Simonovic, S. P. (1997). "A new approach to multi-criteria decision making in water resources." Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 25-44.
14. Traore, Z. N. and Fontane, D. G. (2007). "Managing drought impacts: Case study of Mali, Africa." Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 133, No 4, pp. 300-308.
15. Tsihrintzis, V. A., Hamind, R., and Fuentes, H. R. (1996). "Use of Geographic Information System (GIS) in water resources: A review." Water Resources Management, Vol. 10, pp. 251-277.
16. Yalcin, G. and Akyurek, Z. (2004). "Analysing flood vulnerable areas with multicriteria evaluation." In: Geo-Imagery Bridging Continents, XXth ISPRS Congress, 12-23 July pp. 359-364.
17. Zeleny, M. (1973). "Compromise programming." Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, pp. 262-301.
18. Zeleny, M. (1974). Linear multiobjective programming, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York, N. Y.