Internet-based multi-institutional clinical research: A new method to conduct and manage quality of life studies

Skull Base

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 23-26

  Patel, Snehal G ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

International cooperation; Neoplasms psychology; Questionnaires; Skull base neoplasms surgery; Software design

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL HETEROGENEITY; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RARE DISEASE; REGISTER; SKULL BASE TUMOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 76149092228     PISSN: 15315010     EISSN: 15320065     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1242981     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Federici A B., Rand J H., Bucciarelli P et al, Subcommittee on von Willebrand Factor. Acquired von Willebrand syndrome: data from an international registry. Thromb Haemost 2000 84 345-349
2. Laverty A, Jaffé A, Cunningham S. Establishment of a Web-based registry for rare (orphan) pediatric lung diseases in the United Kingdom: the BPOLD registry. Pediatr Pulmonol 2008 43 451-456
3. Reincke M, Petersenn S, Buchfelder M et al. The German Acromegaly Registry: description of the database and initial results. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2006 114 498-505
4. Patel S G., Singh B, Polluri A et al. Craniofacial surgery for malignant skull base tumors: report of an international collaborative study. Cancer 2003 98 1179-1187
5. Niland J C. NCCN Internet-based data system for the conduct of outcomes research. Oncology (Williston Park) 1998 12 142-146
6. Marshall W W., Haley R W. Use of a secure Internet Web site for collaborative medical research. JAMA 2000 284 1843-1849
7. Khaitan L, Apelgren K, Hunter J, Traverso L W., Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Outcomes Initiative. A report on the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Outcomes Initiative: what have we learned and what is its potential? Surg Endosc 2003 17 365-370
8. Lallas C D., Preminger G M., Pearle M S. et al. Internet based multi-institutional clinical research: a convenient and secure option. J Urol 2004 171 1880-1885
9. Proctor S J., Wilkinson J. A Web-based study concept designed to progress clinical research for orphan disease areas in haematological oncology in the elderly: the SHIELD programme. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2007 61 79-83
10. Schell S R. Creation of clinical research databases in the 21st century: a practical algorithm for HIPAA Compliance. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2006 7 37-44
11. Gil Z, Abergel A, Spektor S, Shabtai E, Khafif A, Fliss D M. Development of a cancer-specific anterior skull base quality-of-life questionnaire. J Neurosurg 2004 100 813-819
12. Jones J B., Snyder C F., Wu A W. Issues in the design of Internet-based systems for collecting patient-reported outcomes. Qual Life Res 2007 16 1407-1417
13. Lum F, Schachat A P., Jampel H D. The development and demise of a cataract surgery database. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2002 28 108-114
14. Berry D L., Trigg L J., Lober W B. et al. Computerized symptom and quality-of-life assessment for patients with cancer part I: development and pilot testing. Oncol Nurs Forum 2004 31 E75-E83
15. Taenzer P, Bultz B D., Carlson L E. et al. Impact of computerized quality of life screening on physician behaviour and patient satisfaction in lung cancer outpatients. Psychooncology 2000 9 203-213
16. Mullen K H., Berry D L., Zierler B K. Computerized symptom and quality-of-life assessment for patients with cancer part II: acceptability and usability. Oncol Nurs Forum 2004 31 E84-E89