The contours and challenges of e-research

e-Research: Transformation in Scholarly Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 3-31

  Jankowski, Nicholas W ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 76149091598     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203875049     Document Type: Chapter

References (66)

1. ACLS (2006). Our cultural commonwealth: The report of the American Council of Learned Societies Commission on cyberinfrastructure for the humanities & social sciences. American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS). Retrieved November 15, 2008, from http://www.acls.org/uploadedFiles/Publications/Programs/Our_Cultural_Commonwealth.pdf
2. Armbruster, C. (2001). Moving out of Oldenburg's long shadow: What is the future for society publishing? Learned Publishing, 20, 259-266. Retrieved November 15, 2008, from http://64.233.183.132/search?q=cache:DCrtm9_H1eYJ:eprints.rclis.org/archive/0001316/01/Society_Oldenburg.pdf+registra tion,+dissemination,+peer+review,+and+archival+record&hl=nl&ct=clnk&c d=2&gl=nl
3. Atkins Report (2003). Revolutionizing science and engineering through cyberinfrastructure. Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure. Retrieved November 15, 2008, from http://www.nsf.gov/od/oci/reports/toc.jsp
4. Bailey, C. W. (2002).Scholarly electronic publishing bibliography. Version 43, 21 June. University of Houston Libraries. Retrieved November 15, 2008, from http://epress.lib.uh.edu/sepb/archive/43/sepb.pdf
5. Band, J. (2008). A guide for the perplexed: Libraries & the Google Library Project settlement. Report, Association of Research Libraries and American Library Association, 13 Nov. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://www.arl.org/pp/ppcopyright/google/
6. Birman, J. S. (2000). Scientific publishing: A mathematician's viewpoint. Notices of AMS, 47(7): 770-774.
7. Borgman, C. L. (2007). Scholarship in the digital age; Information, infrastructure and the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. BRII (2008). Berkeley Research Impact Initiative: Advancing the Impact of UC Berkeley Research. Web site. Program description, 21 January. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/brii/index.html
9. Brown, L., Griffiths, R., & Rascoff, M. (2007). University publishing in a Digital Age. Ithaka Report. 26 July. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://www.ithaka.org/strategic-services/Ithaka%20University%20Publishing%20Report.pdf
10. Buckholtz, A. (2001). Declaring independence: Returning scientific publishing to scientists. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 7(1). Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0007.101
11. Buyya, R., & Venugopal, S. (2005). A gentle introduction to Grid computing and technologies. CSI Communications, 29 (1), 9-19.
12. Contractor, N. (2007). From disasters to WoW-enabling communities with cyberinfrastructure. Kenote presentation, National Centre for e-Social Science, 29 June. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://www.ncess.ac.uk/events/conference/2006/keynotes/presentations/KeynoteNoshirContractor.pdf
13. CTWatch Quarterly (2005). Cyberinfrastructure Technology Watch, press release. CTWatchQuarterly, 17 Feb. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://www.ctwatch.org/
14. Hagemann, C. (2002). Participation in and content of two Dutch political party discussion lists on the Internet. Javnost-The Public, 9(2): 61-76.
15. Edwards, P. N., Jackson, S. J., Bowker, G. C., & Knobel, C. P. (2007). Understanding infrastructure: Dynamics, tensions, and design. Report of the workshop 'History and Theory of Infrastructure: Lessons for New Scientific Cyberinfrastructures'. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/49353
16. Foster, I. (2003). The Grid: Computing without bounds. Scientific American, 288(4): 78-87.
17. Elsevier (2004). Elsevier's comments on evolutions in scientific, technical and medical publishing and reflections on possible implications of Open Access journals for the UK. Report. February. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://www.elsevier.com/authored_news/corporate/images/UKST1Elsevier_position_paper_on_stm_in_UK.pdf
18. Ess, C., & AoIR Ethics Working Group (2002). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the aoir ethics working committee. Report, Association of Internet Research, 27 Nov. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf
19. Garvey, W. D., Lin, N., Nelson, C. E., & Tomita, K. (1972). Research studies in patterns of scientific communication: I. General description of research program. Information Storage and Retrieval, 8(3): 111-122.
20. Godlee, F., & Jefferson, T. (Eds.) (1999). Peer review in Health Sciences. London: BMJ Publishing Group.
21. Harley, D. (2008). The university as publisher: Summary of a meeting held at UC Berkeley on Nov. 1, 2007. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 11(2). Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0011.208
22. Harley, D., Earl-Novell, S., Acord, S.K., Lawrence, S., & C. Judson King, C. J. (2008). Assessing the future landscape of scholarly communication. Interim report. Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://cshe.berkeley.edu/publications/publications.php?id=300
23. King, C. J., Harley, D., Earl-Novell, S., Arter, J., Lawrence, S., & Perciali, I. (2006). Scholarly communication: Academic values and sustainable models. Report. Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California, Berkeley. 27July. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://cshe.berkeley.edu/publications/publications.php?id=23
24. Hine, C. (2003). Systematics as cyberscience: The role of ICTs in the working practices of taxonomy. Paper presented at Oxford Internet Institute. Information, Communication & Society Symposium, 17-20 September, University of Oxford, UK. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/pdfs/hine_oii.pdf
25. Hine, C. M. (ed.) (2006). New infrastructures for knowledge production; Understanding e-Science. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
26. Hine, C. (2008). Systematics as cyberscience; Computers, change, and continuity in science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Hurd, J. M. (2000). The transformation of scientific communication: A model for 2020. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14): 1279-1283.
28. Huston, P. (2001). Book review: Peer review in Health Sciences. Chronic Diseases in Canada. 22(2). Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/cdic-mcc/22-2/e_e.html
29. Indiana University (2007). Indiana University Cyberinfrastructure Newsletter, March. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://racinfo.indiana.edu/newsletter/archives/2007-03.shtml
30. Jankowski, N., & Caldas, A. (2004). e-Science: Principles, projects and possibilities for communication and Internet studies. Paper presented at Etmaal van de Communicatiewetenschap (Day of Communication Science), Nov., University of Twente, the Netherlands.
31. Jankowski, N. W., & Van Selm, M. (2007). Research ethics in a virtual world: Guidelines and illustrations. In N. Carpentier, P. Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, K. Nordenstreng, M. Hartmann, P. Vihalemm, B. Cammaerts, & H. Nieminen (Eds.), Media technologies and democracy in an enlarged Europe, pp. 275-284. Tartu: Tartu University Press. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://www.researchingcommunication.eu/reco_book3.pdf
32. Jeanneney, J.-N. (2007). Google and the myth of universal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. Jensen, K. B. (1991). Introduction: The qualitative turn. In Jensen, K. B., & Jankowski, N. W. (Eds.), A handbook of qualitative methodologies for mass communication research, pp. 1-11. London: Routledge.
34. Kirriemuir, J. (2008). A spring 2008 'snapshot' of U.K. higher and further education developments in Second Life. Report, October 2008. Eduserv Foundation. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://www.eduserv.org.uk/~/media/foundation/sl/uksnapshot052008/final%20pdf.ashx
35. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
36. Leydesdorff, L. (2002). The communication turn in the theory of social systems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 19: 129-136.
37. LLNL (2008). Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, About LLNL. Web site, 13 February. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from https://www.llnl.gov/llnl/about/ (consulted 11 Nov. 2008).
38. Maron, N. L., & Smith, K. K. (2008). Current models of digital scholarly communication. Results of an investigation conducted by Ithaka for the Association of Research Libraries. Report, Nov. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/currentmodels-report.pdf
39. Microsoft External Research (2008). Scholarly communication. Web site. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/tc/scholarly_communication.mspx.
40. Nature (2006). Overview: Nature's peer review trial. Nature. doi: 10.1038/nature05535. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature05535.html
41. Nentwich, M. Cyberscience: Research in the age of the Internet. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://hw.oeaw.ac.at/3188-7
42. NeSC, (n.d.). Defining e-science. National e-Science Centre. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://www.nesc.ac.uk/nesc/define.html
43. Netanel, N. (2008). Google Book search settlement. 28 Oct., Posting to Balkinization blog, Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://balkin.blogspot.com/2008/10/google-book-search-settlement.html
44. Nissenbaum, H., & Price, M. E. (Eds.) (2004). Academy & the Internet. New York: Peter Lang.
45. OeSS Project (n.d.). Oxford e-Social Science Project. Ethical, legal and institutional dynamics of Grid-enabled e-sciences. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/microsites/oess/index.cfm
46. Pochoda, P. (2008). Scholarly publication at the digital tipping point. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 11(2). Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0011.202
47. Rorty, R. M. (ed.) (1967 / 1992). The linguistic turn. Essays in philosophical method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. Schwartz, M. (2008). The trolls among us. New York Times Magazine, 3 Aug. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/03/magazine/03trolls-t.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1
49. Shepherd, J. (2007). It's a world of possibilities; Virtual campuses are springing up in Second Life, as universities discover the advantages of cyberspace. Guardian, online edition. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2007/may/08/students.elearning/print
50. SNAC (2005). Social networks and cyberinfrastructure. Workshop 'The role of social network research in enabling cyberinfrastructure and the role of cyberinfrastructure in enabling social network research'. 3-5 Nov. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Conferences/SNAC/
51. Salaway, G. & Caruso, J. B., with Nelson. M. R. (2008). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2008. Research study, vol. 8. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://www.educause.edu/ecar
52. Schneider, S. M. (1997). Expanding the public sphere through computer-mediated communication: Political discussion about abortion in a Usenet newsgroup. . Unpublished Doctoral, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
53. de Solla Price, D. (1993). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
54. Steele, C. (2008). Scholarly monograph publishing in the 21st Century: The future more than ever should be an open book. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 11(2). Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0011.201
55. Suber, P. (2008). Open access in 2007. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 11(1). Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0011.110
56. Thompson, J. B. (2005). Books in the Digital Age: The transformation of academic and higher education publishing in Britain and the United States. . Cambridge, UK: Polity.
57. Townsend, R. B. (2003). History and future of scholarly publishing. Perspectives, American Historical Association, October.
58. Turow, J., & Tsui, L. (Eds.) (2008). The hyperlinked society; Questioning connections in the Digital Age. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://www.digitalculture.org/hyperlinked.html
59. Von Lohmann, F. (2008). Google book search settlement: A reader's guide. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/10/googlebooks-settlement-readers-guide
60. Waldrop, M. M. (2008). Science 2.0-Is open access science the future? Scientific American. April. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=science-2-point-0
61. Ware, M. (2008). Peer review: Benefits, perceptions and alternatives. PRC Summary Papers 4. Publishing Research Consortium. London. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://www.publishingresearch.net/documents/PRCsummary4Warefinal.pdf
62. Ware, M., & Monkman, M. (2008). Peer review in scholarly journals: Perspective of the scholarly community-an international study. Report. Publishing Research Consortium. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://www.publishingresearch.net/documents/PeerReviewFullPRCReport-final.pdf
63. Weinberg, A. M. (1961). Impact of large-scale science on the United States: Big science is here to stay, but we have yet to make the hard financial and educational choices it imposes. Science, 134(3473): 161-164.
64. Willinsky, J. (2005). The access principle: The case for open access to research and scholarship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/willinsky/TheAccessPrinciple_TheMITPress_0262232421.pdf
65. Wouters, P. (1996). Cyberscience. Kennis en Methode, 20(2): 155-186.
66. Wyatt, S. (2008). Challenging the digital imperative. Inaugural lecture. Maastricht University, the Netherlands, 28 March. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2008, from http://www.unimaas.nl/bestand.asp?id=10221