A new angiographic method to assess coronary flow reserve - Validation in humans

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 167-173

  Rittger, Harald ^a   Kuper, Asher ^b   Breithardt, Ole Alexander ^a   Kuon, Eberhardt ^c   Schmidt, Martin ^a   Sinha, Anil Martin ^a   Blüm, Barbara ^a   Jakob, Axel ^a   Brachmann, Johannes ^a  

^a KLINIKUM COBURG   (Germany)

^b Paieon Medical Ltd   (Israel)

^c Klinik Frankische Schweiz   (Germany)

Author keywords

Coronary angiography; Doppler wire; Microcirculation

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; IOPROMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY FLOW RESERVE; DENSITOMETRY; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; HYPEREMIA; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REST; THORAX PAIN;

ADENOSINE; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY CIRCULATION; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPEREMIA; MALE; MICROCIRCULATION; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VASODILATOR AGENTS;

EID: 76049096763     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22251     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Hoffman JI. Maximal coronary flow and the concept of coronary vascular reserve. Circulation 1984;70:153-159.
2. Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Smith L, Aarnoudse W, Barbato E, Bartunek J, Bech GJ, Van De Vosse F. Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve: Validation in humans. Circulation 2002;105:2482-2486.
3. Cusma JT, Toggart EJ, Folts JD, Peppler WW, Hangiandreou NJ, Lee CS, Mistretta CA. Digital subtraction angiographic imaging of coronry flow reserve. Circulation 1987;75:461-472.
4. Hangiandreou NJ, Folts JD, Peppler WW, Mistretta CA. Coronary blood flow measurements using an angiographic first pass distribution technique: A feasibility study. Med Phys 1991;18: 947-954.
5. The TIMI Study Group. The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) trial. N Engl J Med 1985;312:932-936.
6. Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Daley WL, Dodge JT, Alexander B Jr, Marble SJ, Mccabe CH, Raymond L, Fortin T, Poole WK, Braunwald E. TIMI frame count: A quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow. Circulation 1996;93:879-888.
7. Manginas A, Gatzov P, Chasikidis C, Voudris V, Pavlides G, Cokkinos DV. Estimation of coronary flow reserve using the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count method. Am J Cardiol 1999;83:1562-1565.
8. Vogel RA. The radiographic assessment of coronary blood flow parameters. Circulation 1985;72:460-465.
9. Eigler NL, Pfaff JM, Zeiher A, Whiting JS, Forrester JS. Digital angiographic impulse response analysis of regional myocardial perfusion: Linearity, reproducibility, accuracy, and comparison with conventional indicator dilution curve parameters in phantom and canine models. Circ Res 1989;64:853-866.
10. Eigler NL, Schühlen H, Whiting JS, Pfaff JM, Zeiher A, Gu S. Digital angiographic impulse response analysis of regional myocardial perfusion: Estimation of coronary flow, flow reserve, and distribution volume by compartmental transit time measurement in canine model. Circ Res 1991;68:870-880.
11. Pijls NH, Uijen GJ, Hoevelaken A, Arts T, Aengevaeren WR, Bos HS, Fast JH, Van Leeuwen KL, Van Der Werf T. Mean transit time for the assessment of myocardial perfusion by videodensitometry. Circulation 1990;81:1331-1340.
12. Verhoeven LA. Digital subtraction angiography: The technique and an analysis of the physical factors influencing the image quality. PhD thesis, University of Delft, The Netherlands, 1985.
13. Rutishauser W, Simon H, Stucky JP, Schad N, Noseda G, Wellauer J. Evaluation of roentgen cinedensitometry for flow measurements in models and in the intact circulation. Circulation 1967;36:951-963.
14. Vogel R, Lefree M, Bates E, O'neill W, Foster R, Kirlin P, Smith D, Pitt B. Application of digital techniques to selective coronary arteriography: Use of myocardial contrast appearance time to measure coronary flow reserve. Am Heart J 1984;107: 153-164.
15. Simon R, Herrmann G, Amende I. Comparison of three different principles in the assessment of coronary flow reserve from digital angiograms. Int J Card Imaging 1990;5:203-212.
16. Hess OM, Mcgillem MJ, Deboe SF, Pinto IM, Gallagher KP, Mancini GB. Determination of coronary flow reserve by parametric imaging. Circulation 1990;82:1438-1448.
17. Lang M, Brennecke R, Haude M, Renneisen U, Erbel R, Meyer J. Improving the applicability of myocardial densitometry and parametric imaging by extended automated densogram analysis. Int J Card Imaging 1995;11:105-115.
18. Nissen SE, Elion JL, Booth DC, Evans J, Demaria AN. Value and limitations of computer analysis of digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of coronary flow reserve. Circulation 1986;73:562-571.
19. Thompson JA, Starmar F, Whalen RE, Mcintosh HD. Indicator transit time considered as a gamma variate. Circ Res 1964;14: 502-515.
20. Gaster AL, Korsholm L, Thayssen P, Pedersen KE, Haghfelt TH. Reproducibility of intravascular ultrasound and intracoronary Doppler measurements. Catheter Cardiovasc Int 2001;53: 449-458.
21. Porenta G, Schima H, Pentaris A, Tsangaris S, Moertl D, Probst P, Maurer G, Baumgartner H. Assessment of coronary stenosis by Doppler wires: A validation study using in vitro modeling and computer simulations. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999;25:793-801.
22. Bascom PA, Johnston KW, Cobbold RS, Ojha M. Defining the limitations of measurements from Doppler spectral recordings. J Vasc Surg 1996;24:34-44.