Professional and public ethics united in condemnation of transplant tourism

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 18-20

  Martin, Dominique ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BENEFICENCE; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MEDICAL TOURISM; MORALITY; ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; PRISONER; PUNISHMENT; SOCIAL JUSTICE; STANDARD; TRANSPLANTATION;

BENEFICENCE; CAPITAL PUNISHMENT; ETHICS, MEDICAL; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; MEDICAL TOURISM; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; PRISONERS; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT;

EID: 76049090683     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160903506376     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Parry, J. 2009. China starts to move away from using organs from executed prisoners for transplantation. British Medical Journal 339: b3567.
2. Rhodes, R., and T. Schiano. 2010. Transplant tourism in China: A tale of two transplants. American Journal of Bioethics 10(2): 3-11.
3. Steering Committee of the Istanbul Summit. 2008. Organ trafficking and transplant tourism and commercialism: The Declaration of Istanbul. Lancet 372: 5-6.
4. The Transplantation Society. 2007. Policy on interaction with China. Transplantation 84: 292-294.
5. Welch, D. 1993. Just another day at the office: The ordinariness of professional ethics. Professional Ethics 2(3): 3-13.
6. World Health Organization. 2008. WHO guiding principles on human cell, tissue and organ transplantation (updated edition). Available at http://www.who.int/transplantation/TxGP08-en.pdf (accessed 15 November 2009).