Quality of meat from young bulls in relation to its ultimate pH value

Animal Science Papers and Reports

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 293-302

  Daszkiewicz, Tomasz ^a   Wajda, Stanisław ^a   Kubiak, Dorota ^a   Krasowska, Joanna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARMIA AND MAZURY IN OLSZTYN   (Poland)

Author keywords

Bulls; Meat quality; Ultimate pH

Indexed keywords

BOS; FRIESIA;

EID: 76049090043     PISSN: 08604037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. AASLYNG M.D., BEJERHOLM C., ERTBJERG P., BERTRAM H.C., ANDERSEN H. 2003. Cooking loss and juiciness of pork in relation to raw meat quality and cooking procedure. Food Quality and Preference 14, 277-288.
2. AOAC, 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th Edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D.C
3. BYRNE C.E., TROY D.J., BUCKLEY D.J., 2000. Postmortem changes in muscle electrical properties of bovine M. longissimus dorsi and their relationship to meat quality attributes and pH fall. Meat Science 54, 23-34.
4. DEVINE C. E., GRAAFHUIS A.E., MUIR P.D., CHRYSTALL B.B., 1993. The effect of growth rate and ultimate pH on meat quality of lambs. Meat Science 35, 63-77.
5. GEESINK G.H., OUALI A., SMULDERS F.I.M., TALMANT A., TASSY C., GUIGNOT F., VAN LAACK R.L.J.M., 1992. The role of ultimate pH on proteolysis and calpain, and calpastatin activity in bovine muscle. Biochimie 74, 283-289.
6. GUIGNOT F., TOURAILLE C., OUALI A., RENERRE M., 1994. Relationship between post-mortem pH changes and some traits of sensory quality in veal. Meat Science 37, 315-325.
7. HONIKEL K.O., KIM C.J., 1985. U{double acute}ber die ursachen der entstehung von PSE-schweinefleisch. Fleischwirtschaft 65, 1125-1131.
8. JELENÍKOVÁ J., PIPEK P., MIYAHARA M., 2008. The effects of breed, sex, intramuscular fat and ultimate pH on pork tenderness. European Food Research and Technology 227, 989-994.
9. KORTZ J., 2001. The chief defects of meat and methods of detection. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences 10/51, 3(S), 6-10.
10. MCLOUNGHLIN I.V., GOLDSPINK C., 1963. Post mortem changes in the colour of pig longissimus dorsi muscle. Nature 198, 584-587.
11. MELLER Z., DASZKIEWICZ T., Bak T., Klupczyński J., 1998. Zmiany składu podstawowego i cech fizykochemicznych podczas dojrzewania mie{ogonek}sa wołowego normalnego i z wada{ogonek} DFD, pochodza{ogonek}cego od bydła zróżnicowanego genetycznie (Changes in the basic composition and physical and chemical properties during the ripening of "normal" and DFD meat coming from genetically different cattle). In Polish, summary in English. Acta Academiae Agriculturae ac Technicae Olstenensis, Zootechnica 48, 63-70
12. OBANOR F., MORTON J. D., GESSINK G., BICKERSTAFFE R., 2001. Effect of pre-slaughter stress on beef quality. Proceedings of the 47th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, August 26-31, Cracow, Poland, Volume I, 272-273.
13. Polish Standard PN-ISO 4121, 1998. Analiza sensoryczna. Metodologia. Ocena produktów żywnościowych przy użyciu metod skalowania (Sensory analysis. Methodology. Evaluation of food products by methods using scales). In Polish.
14. PURCHAS R.W., 1990. An assessment of the role of pH differences in determining the relative tenderness of meat from bulls and steers. Meat Science 27, 129-140.
15. SEIDEMAN S.C., CROSS H.R., SMITH G.C., DURLAND P.R., 1984. Factors affecting fresh meat colour: a review. Journal of Food Quality 6, 211-237.
16. SCHWÄGELE F., 1999. Kühlung, Kühllagerung und Fleischreifung. Chemische und physikalische Grundlagen-2. Biochemische Vorgänge. Fleischwirtschaft 6, 103-106.
17. SILVA J.A., PATARATA L., MARTINS C. 1999. Influence of ultimate pH on bovine meat tenderness during ageing. Meat Science 52, 453-459.
18. SOBINA I., 1998. Badania zmian jakości mie{ogonek}sa wieprzowego normalnego i wadliwego (PSE i DFD) w procesie autolizy w zależności od temperatury składowania (Changes in the quality of normal, PSE and DFD pork in the process of autolysis, depending on different temperatures of storage). Thesis. In Polish. Published by the Agricultural University in Olsztyn. Rozprawy Habilitacyjne i Monografie 1.
19. StatSoft, Inc., 2005. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 7.1. www.statsoft.com.
20. VAN LAACK R.L.J.M., KAUFFMAN R.G., GREASER M.L., 2001. Determinants of ultimate pH of meat. Proceedings of the 47th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, August 26-31, Cracow, Poland, Volume I, 22-26.
21. VAN OECKEL, M.J., WARNANTS, N. BOUCQUEÉ, C.H.V., 1999. Comparison of different methods for measuring water holding capacity and juiciness of pork versus on-line screening methods. Meat Science 51, 313-320.
22. VILJOEN H.F., DE KOCK H.L., WEBB E.C., 2002. Consumer acceptability of dark, firm and dry (DFD) and normal pH beef steaks. Meat Science 61, 181-185.
23. WICHŁACZ H., KRZYWICKI K., 1986. Barwa mie{ogonek}sa wołowego (The beef colour). In Polish. Gospodarka Mie{ogonek}sna 2, 16-18.
24. ZNANIECKI P. (editor), 1983. Zarys obrotu, oceny i przetwórstwa surowców pochodzenia zwierze{ogonek}cego (Outline of Turnover, Evaluation and Processing of Animal Raw Materials). In Polish. PWRiL, Warszawa, 221-237.