Impact of Mental Disorders on Cost and Reimbursement for Patients in Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 184-188

  Dobrez, Deborah ^a   Heinemann, Allen W ^b,c   Deutsch, Anne ^b,c   Durkin, Elizabeth M ^c   Almagor, Orit ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Costs and cost analysis; Depression; Medicare; Mental disorders; Prospective payment system; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANXIETY DISORDER; ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAJOR DEPRESSION; MALE; MEDICARE; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH; MOOD DISORDER; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT; REHABILITATION CENTER; REIMBURSEMENT; SECONDARY ANALYSIS; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; UNITED STATES;

AGED; COHORT STUDIES; FEE-FOR-SERVICE PLANS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICARE; MENTAL DISORDERS; PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM; REHABILITATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 76049085375     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.020     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Medicare Payment Advisory Committee. Medicare payment policy: report to the Congress (2001), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington (DC)
2. Prospective Payment Assessment Commission. Post-acute providers, report and recommendations to the Congress (1997), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington (DC)
3. Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility-Patient Assessment Instrument (IRF-PAI)-training manual 2004 (2004) Buffalo: Foundation Activities, Inc/Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation
4. Medicare programprospective payment system for inpatient rehabilitation facilities. final rule. Federal Register 66 (2001) 41315-41430
5. Carter G.M., and Totten M.E. Preliminary analyses of the refinement of the tier comorbidities in the inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system (2005), RAND Corp, Santa Monica
6. Turner-Stokes L., and Hassan N. Depression after stroke: a review of the evidence base to inform the development of an integrated care pathway: part 1: diagnosis, frequency and impact. Clin Rehabil 16 (2002) 231-247
7. Morrison V., Pollard B., Johnston M., and MacWalter R. Anxiety and depression 3 years following stroke: demographic, clinical and psychological predictors. J Psychosom Res 59 (2002) 209-213
8. Hinkle J.L., Smith R., and Revere K. A comparison of stroke risk factors between men and women with disabilities. Rehabil Nurs 31 (2006) 70-77
9. Notice. Federal Register 67 (2002) 49928-49944
10. Final rule. Federal Register 68 (2003) 45674-45728
11. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Archived Consumer Price Index news releases. http://www.bls.gov/cpi/home.htm#data
12. Moulton B.R. An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables on micro units. Rev Econ Stat 72 (1990) 334-338
13. Deaton A. The analysis of household surveys (1997), Johns Hopkins Pr, Baltimore
14. Stineman M.G., Shea J.A., Jette A., et al. The Functional Independence Measure: tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77 (1996) 1101-1108
15. Kidd D., Stewart G., Baldry J., et al. The Functional Independence Measure: a comparative validity and reliability study. Disabil Rehabil 17 (1995) 10-14
16. Carter G.M., Buchanan J.L., Buntin M.B., et al. Executive summary of analyses for the initial implementation of the inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system (2002), RAND Health, Santa Monica