|
Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 72-78
|
Comparison of the sensitivity for detecting foreign bodies among conventional plain radiography, computed tomography and ultrasonography
|
Author keywords
Computerized tomography; Foreign body; Plain radiography; Ultrasonography
|
Indexed keywords
ANIMAL;
ARTICLE;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
ECHOGRAPHY;
FOREIGN BODY;
MANDIBLE;
MAXILLARY SINUS;
RADIOGRAPHY;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SHEEP;
TONGUE;
TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;
ANIMALS;
FOREIGN BODIES;
MANDIBLE;
MAXILLARY SINUS;
RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SHEEP, DOMESTIC;
TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;
TONGUE;
|
EID: 75949128655
PISSN: 0250832X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/68589458 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (112)
|
References (9)
|