The Systematic Review Process: An Overview

Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 40-42

  Windle, Pamela E ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVIDENCE BASED NURSING; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; NURSING RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; POSTANESTHESIA NURSING; QUALITY CONTROL;

BENCHMARKING; EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; NURSING RESEARCH; POSTANESTHESIA NURSING; RESEARCH DESIGN; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 75949127400     PISSN: 10899472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2009.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Ingersoll G.L. Evidence-based nursing: What it is and what it isn't. Nurs Outlook 48 (2000) 151-152
2. Cook D.J., Mulrow C.D., and Haynes R.B. Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Acad Clin 126 (1997) 376-380
3. Pai M., McCulloch M., Gorman J., et al. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: An illustrated step-by-step guide. Nat Med J India 17 (2004) 86-95
4. Shojania K.G., Sampson M., Ansari M.T., et al. How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis. Ann Intern Med 147 (2007) 224-233
5. In: Oxman A. (Ed). Preparing and maintaining systematic reviews. In: Cochrane Collaboration Handbook, section VI (1995), Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford
6. Windle P.E. Moving beyond the barriers for evidence-based practice implementation. J Perianesth Nurs 21 (2006) 208-211
7. Fink R., Thompson C.J., and Bonnes D. Overcoming barriers and promoting the use of research in practice. J Nurs Adm 35 (2005) 517-518