Predicting the impact of the EU common agricultural policy reform in England: Micro and macroeconomic aspects

Journal of Business Economics and Management

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 237-244

  Areal, Francisco J ^a   Ceddia, Michele G ^b   Pazienza, Pasquale ^c  

^a CENTRAL SCIENCE LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FOGGIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Agricultural business management; CAP reform; Economic impacts evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 75949127155     PISSN: 16111699     EISSN: 20294433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/16111699.2007.9636175     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Agra Europe (2004) July 23.
2. BENJAMINE, C., GOHIN, A., and GUYOMARD, H., 1999. The future of European dairy policy. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 47:91–101.
3. BOUAMRA MECHEMACHE, Z., and RÉQUILLART, V., 2000. Analysis of EU dairy policy reform. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 27(4):409–430.
4. BURREL, A., 2004. The 2003 CAP reform Implications for the EU dairy sector. Outlook on agriculture, 33(1):15–25.
5. Centre for Rural Economic Research. 2003. CAP reform:Decoupling Arable Payment. A discussion document for DE-FRA, University of Cambridge.
6. COLMAN, D., ZHUANG, Y., and FRANKS, J. R., 2004. UK milk production following the 2003 reform of the CAP, 1–40. Centre of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics, The University of Manchester.
7. DEFRA. 2004. “ CAP single payment scheme:basis for allocation of entitlement ”. DEFRA Report. Available from Internet:
8. DEFRA. 2003. “ Updated Regulatory Impact Assessment on the European Commission's proposals of January 2003 for the Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy ”. DEFRA Report
9. EU Commission. 2003. “ Mid-Term Review of the Common Agricultural Policy. Directorate General for Agriculture ”. Available from Internet:
10. EU Commission. 2003. “ Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy. A Long Term Perspective for Sustainable Agriculture. An Impact Analysis ”. European Commission, Directorate-General for Agriculture. Available from Internet:
11. EU Commission. 2001. “ Risk Management Tools for EU Agriculture ”. Working Document by the General Directorate for Agriculture. Available from Internet:
12. GRANT, W., 2003. The prospects of CAP reform. The Political Quarterly, 74(1):19–26.
13. GUYOMARD, H., BAUDRY, M., and CARPENTIER, A., 1996. Estimating crop supply response in the presence of farm programmes:application to the CAP. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 23:401–420.
14. HARRIS, D., 2005. Industry adjustment to policy reform., 1–87. case study of the Australian dairy industry Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation.
15. MOSS, J., MCERLAN, S., KOSTOV, PATTON, M., WESTHOFF and BINFIELD, J., 2002. Analysis of the impact of modulation on agriculture in UK, Ireland:Queen's University of Belfast. Available from Internet:
16. NERLOVE, M., 1958. The dynamics of supply:Estimation of farmers’ response to price, Baltimore:John Hopkins Press.
17. OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. 2003. “ Establishing Common Rules for Direct Support Schemes Under the Common Agricultural Policy and Establishing Certain Support Schemes for Farmers and Amending Regulations ”. Brusselles (EEC) No. 2019/93, (EC) No. 1452/2001, (EC) No. 1453/2001, (EC) 1454/2001, (EC) 1868/94, (EC) No. 1251/1999, (EC) No. 1254/1999, (EC) No. 1673/2000, (EEEC) No. 2358/71 and (EC) No. 2529/2001, Council Regulation (EC) No. 1782/2003
18. SKOKAI and ANTÓN, J., 2005. The degree of decoupling of area payments for arable crops in the European Union. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(5):1220–1228.
19. SWINBANK, A., and TRANTER, R., 2004. A bond scheme for common agricultural policy reform, CABI.
20. WOOLDRIDGE, J. M., 2002. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.