Daily activity patterns of university students

Journal of Urban Planning and Development

Volumn 135, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 141-149

  Eom, Jin Ki ^a   Stone, John R ^b   Ghosh, Sujit K ^c  

^a Korea Railroad Research Institute   (South Korea)

^b North Carolina State University   (United States)

^c NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Models; North Carolina; Planning; Students; Traffic surveys; Transportation management; Travel demand; Travel patterns; Universities

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY-BASED; COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS; DAILY ACTIVITY PATTERNS; GRADUATE STUDENTS; NORTH CAROLINA; NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY; OFF-CAMPUS STUDENTS; STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE; STUDENT GROUPS; TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT; TRAVEL DEMAND; TRAVEL DEMAND MODELS; TRAVEL PATTERNS; TRAVEL SURVEYS; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS; UNIVERSITY STUDENTS; WORK ACTIVITIES;

MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; PLANNING; TRAFFIC SURVEYS;

STUDENTS;

MODELING; STUDENT; TRANSPORTATION MODE; TRAVEL DEMAND; URBAN TRANSPORT;

NORTH CAROLINA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 75949111868     PISSN: 07339488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000015     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Alam SB, Goulias KG. Dynamic emergency evacuation management system using spatio-temporal models of behavior. 1999, 32-40, Transportation Research Record. 1660, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
2. Algers S, Eliasson J, Mattsson L. Activity-based model development to support transport planning in the Stockholm region. Proc., 5th Workshop of the TLE Network 2001, ERSA, Vienna, Austria.
3. Allison ML, Sivaramakrishnan S, Chandra RB. Exploratory analysis of weekend activity patterns in the San Francisco Bay Area, California. 2005, 70-78, Transportation Research Record. 1926, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
4. Isler E, Hoel LA. The effect of land use planning on university transportation systems. 2004, Center for Transportation Studies at the Univ. of Virginia, prepared for the Mid-Atlantic Universities Center for Transportation, Research Rep. No. UVACTS-5-14-67.
5. McNally MG. The activity-based approach. Handbook of transport modeling 2000, 113-128. D. A. Hensher, K. J. Button, eds., Pergamon.
6. NC State Univ. Travel Demand Model Final Rep., Prepared for NC State DOT 2004a, Martin/Alexiou/Bryson (MAB) PLLC, Raleigh, N.C.
7. 2004b, Martin/Alexiou/Bryson (MAB) PLLC, NC State Univ. Student Travel Survey Final Rep., Prepared for NC State DOT, Raleigh, N.C.
8. Pavlovich JS. Park and parcel: A careful examination of demand and supply of parking accommodations at your institution is a critical part of campus planning. American School & University 1993, 65(8):April. 0003-0945.
9. Poinsatte F, Toor W. Finding a New Way: Campus Transportation in the Twenty-First Century, Final Rep. 1999, Univ. of Colorado Environmental Center, Boulder, Colo.
10. Model validation and reasonableness checking manual 1997, Travel Model Improvement Plan, http://tmip.fhwa.dot.gov/clearinghouse/docs/mvrcm/ (May 20, 2005).
11. Triangle Regional Model Final Rep., Prepared for North Carolina DOT 1999, Triangle Regional Model Service Bureau, Raleigh, N.C.