An effective algorithm for computing global sensitivity indices (EASI)

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 95, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 354-360

  Plischke, Elmar ^a  

^a CLAUSTHAL UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Correlation ratio; FAST method; Global sensitivity analysis; Post processing algorithm; Sobol' sensitivity indices; Space filling curves

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION RATIO; FAST METHODS; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; POSTPROCESSING ALGORITHMS; SOBOL' SENSITIVITY INDEX; SPACE-FILLING CURVE;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATION THEORY; FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT; FOURIER ANALYSIS;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 75949090080     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2009.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Saltelli A., Tarantola S., and Chan K. A quantitative, model independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output. Technometrics 41 (1999) 39-56
2. Tarantola S., Gatelli D., and Mara T. Random balance designs for the estimation of first order global sensitivity indices. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 91 (2006) 717-727
3. Saltelli A. Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices. Computer Physics Communication 145 (2002) 280-297
4. Sobol' I., Tarantola S., Gatelli D., Kucherenko S., and Mauntz W. Estimating the approximation error when fixing unessential factors in global sensitivity analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 92 (2007) 957-960
5. Saltelli A., Chan K., and Scott E. Sensitivity analysis (2000), Wiley, Chichester
6. Saltelli A., Ratto M., Andres T., Campolongo F., Cariboni J., Gatelli D., et al. Global sensitivity analysis-the primer (2008), Wiley, Chichester
7. Schroeder MR. Number theory in science and communication. With applications in cryptography, physics, digital information, computing, and self-similarity, 5th ed. Berlin: Springer; 2009.
8. Knuth DE. The art of computer programming, vol. 4. Fasc. 2: Generating all tuples and permutations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley; 2005.
9. Knuth DE. The art of computer programming, vol. 4. Fasc. 3: Generating all combinations and partitions. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley; 2005.
10. Gatelli D., Kucherenko S., Ratto M., and Tarantola S. Calculating first-order sensitivity measures: a benchmark of some recent methodologies. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 94 (2009) 1212-1219
11. Saltelli A., and Tarantola S. On the relative importance of input factors in mathematical models: safety assessment for nuclear waste disposal. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 97 459 (2002) 702-709
12. Nuclear Energy Agency. PSACOIN level E intercomparison. Technical Report, OECD, Paris; 1989.
13. Röhlig K-J, Plischke E, Bolado Lavín R, Becker D-A, Ekström P-A, et al. Lessons learnt from studies on sensitivity analysis techniques in the EU project PAMINA: a benchmark study. In: Reliability, risk and safety. Theory and Applications. Proceedings of the ESREL 2009 annual conference, vol. 3. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2009. p. 1769-75.
14. Pearson K. On the general theory of skew correlation and non-linear regression, vol. XIV of mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. London: Drapers' Company Research Memoirs, Dulau & Co. London; 1905 (reprinted in: Early Statistical Papers, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; 1948).
15. Kelley T.L. An unbiased correlation ratio measure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, of the United States of America 21 9 (1935) 554-559