Behavior of geogrid-sand interface in direct shear mode

Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

Volumn 135, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1863-1871

  Liu, Chia Nan ^a   Zornberg, Jorge G ^b   Chen, Tsong Chia ^a   Ho, Yu Hsien ^a   Lin, Bo Hung ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHI NAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

Geogrids; Geosynthetics; Interfaces; Sand, soil type; Shear tests

Indexed keywords

SAND; SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS; SOILS; TENSILE STRENGTH; TESTING;

DIRECT SHEAR; DIRECT SHEAR MODE; DIRECT SHEAR TEST; GEOGRIDS; GEOSYNTHETICS; INTERFACE RESISTANCE; INTERFACE SHEAR; INTERFACE SHEAR STRENGTH; SHEAR DISPLACEMENT; SHEAR TESTS; SIMPLE MODEL; SOIL TYPES; TEST RESULTS; TRANSVERSE RIBS;

SHEAR STRENGTH;

DISPLACEMENT; GEOMEMBRANE; GEOTEXTILE; NUMERICAL MODEL; REINFORCED EARTH; SANDY SOIL; SHEAR STRENGTH; SHEAR TEST; SOIL REINFORCEMENT; SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION;

EID: 75949085098     PISSN: 10900241     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000150     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Abu-Farsakh MY, Coronel J. Characterization of cohesive soil-geosynthetic interaction from large direct shear test. Proc., 85th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 2006, Washington, D.C.
2. Alfaro MC, Miura N, Bergado DT. Soil geogrid reinforcement interaction by pullout and direct shear tests. Geotech. Test. J. 1995, 18(2):157-167. GTJODJ, 0149-6115, 10.1520/GTJ10319J.
3. Standard test method for determining the coefficient of soil and geosynthetic or geosynthetic and geosynthetic friction by the direct shear method. 2002, ASTM, D5321-02, ASTM, West Conshohoken, Pa.
4. Bakeer RM, Sayed M, Cates P, Subramanian R. Pullout and shear test on geogrid reinforced lightweight aggregate. Geotext. Geomembr. 1998, 16(2):119-133. ZZZZZZ, 0266-1144, 10.1016/S0266-1144(97)10025-5.
5. Bauer GE, Zhao Y. Evaluation of shear strength and dilatancy behavior of reinforced soil from direct shear tests. ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ. 1993, 1190:138-157. ASTTA8, 0066-0558.
6. Bergado DT, Chai JC, Abiera HO, Alfaro MC, Balasubramaniam AS. Interaction between cohesive-frictional soil and various grid reinforcements. Geotext. Geomembr. 1993, 12(4):327-349. ZZZZZZ, 0266-1144, 10.1016/0266-1144(93)90008-C.
7. Cancelli A, Rimoldi P, Togni S. Frictional characteristics of geogrids by means of direct shear and pullout tests. Proc., Int. Symp. on Earth Reinforcement Practice 1992, 51-56. Kyushu Univ., Fukuoka, Japan.
8. Cazzuffi D, Picarelli L, Ricciuti A, Rimold P. Laboratory investigations on the shear strength of geogrid reinforced soils. ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ. 1993, 1190:119-137. ASTTA8, 0066-0558.
9. Performance test for geosynthetic reinforced soil including effects of preloading. 2001, 270. Federal Highway Administration, FHWA-RD-01-118, Research, Development and Technology, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center.
10. Hatami K, Bathurst RJ. Numerical model for reinforced soil segmental walls under surcharge loading. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2006, 132(6):673-684. JGGEFK, 1090-0241, 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:6(673).
11. Jarret PM, Bathurst RJ. Frictional development at a gravel geosynthetic peat interface. Proc., 2nd Canadian Symp. of Geotextiles and Geomembranes 1985, 1-6. Edmonton, Canada.
12. Jewell RA. Reinforcement bond capacity. Geotechnique 1990, 40(3):513-518. GTNQA8, 0016-8505.
13. Koerner RM, Wayne MH, Carroll RG. Analytic behavior of geogrid anchorage. Proc., Geosynthetics'89 Conf 1989, 525-536. IFAI, San Diego.
14. Lopez ML. Soil geosynthetic interaction. Geosynthetics and their applications 2002., Thomas Telford, London.
15. Martin JP, Koerner RM, Whitty JE. Experimental friction evaluation of slippage between geomembranes, geotextiles, and soils. Proc., Int. Conf. Geomembranes 1984, 191-196. IFAI, St. Paul, Minn.
16. Milligan GW E, Earl RF, Bush DI. Observations of photo-elastic pullout tests on geotextiles and geogrids. Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products 1990, 2:747-751. Hague, The Netherlands.
17. Palmeira EM. Bearing force mobilisation in pullout tests on geogrids. Geotext. Geomembr. 2004, 22(6):481-509. ZZZZZZ, 0266-1144, 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2004.03.007.
18. Palmeira EM, Milligan GW E. Scale and other factors affecting the results of the pullout tests of grids buried in sand. Geotechnique 1989, 39(4):551-584. GTNQA8, 0016-8505.
19. Sugimoto M, Alagiyawanna AM N, Kadoguchi K. Influence of rigid and flexible face on geogrid pullout tests. Geotext. Geomembr. 2001, 19(5):257-328. ZZZZZZ, 0266-1144, 10.1016/S0266-1144(01)00011-5.
20. Tatlisoz N, Edil TB, Benson CH. Interaction between reinforcing geosynthetics and soil-tire chip mixtures. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 1998, 124(11):1109-1119. JGGEFK, 1090-0241, 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:11(1109).
21. Teixeira SH C, Bueno BS, Zornberg JG. Pullout resistance of individual longitudinal and transverse geogrid ribs. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2007, 133(1):37-50. JGGEFK, 1090-0241, 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:1(37).