Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation Without Corporeal Dilation: A Cavernous Tissue Sparing Technique

Journal of Urology

Volumn 183, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 1123-1126

  Moncada, Ignacio ^a   Martínez Salamanca, Juan Ignacio ^c   Jara, José ^b   Cabello, Ramiro ^b   Moralejo, Mercedes ^b   Hernández, Carlos ^b  

^a HOSPITAL LA ZARZUELA   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO GREGORIO MARAÑÓN   (Spain)

^c HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO PUERTA DE HIERRO   (Spain)

Author keywords

complications; outcome and process assessment (health care); penile erection; penis; prostheses and implants

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORPUS CAVERNOSUM; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PENIS PROSTHESIS; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PENILE IMPLANTATION; PENILE PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

EID: 75849147892     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.048     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Scott F.B., Bradley W.E., and Timm G.W. Management of erectile impotence. Use of implantable inflatable prosthesis. Urology 2 (1973) 80
2. Montorsi F., Rigatti P., Carmignani G., et al. AMS three-piece inflatable implants for erectile dysfunction: a long-term multi-institutional study in 200 consecutive patients. Eur Urol 37 (2000) 50
3. Montague D.K., and Angermeier K.W. Contemporary aspects of penile prosthesis implantation. Urol Int 70 (2003) 141
4. Grasso M., Lania C., Fortuna F., et al. Evaluation of post-operative residual function of corpora cavernosa after soft penile prosthesis implant for Peyronie's disease. Arch Ital Urol Androl 78 (2006) 49
5. Shafik A. Hollow and fenestrated penile prosthesis: a new implant for treatment of impotence. Arch Androl 38 (1997) 93
6. Anastasiadis A.G., Wilson S.K., Burchardt M., et al. Long-term outcomes of inflatable penile implants: reliability, patient satisfaction and complication management. Curr Opin Urol 11 (2001) 619
7. Macaluso Jr. J.N., and Sullivan J.W. Priapism: review of 34 cases. Urology 26 (1985) 233
8. Bertram R.A., Webster G.D., and Carson III C.C. Priapism: etiology, treatment, and results in series of 35 presentations. Urology 26 (1985) 229
9. Larsen E.H., Gasser T.C., and Bruskewitz R.C. Fibrosis of corpus cavernosum after intracavernous injection of phentolamine/papaverine. J Urol 137 (1987) 292
10. Gasser T.C., Larsen E.H., and Bruskewitz R.G. Penile prosthesis reimplantation. J Urol 137 (1987) 46
11. Wilson S. Reimplantation of inflatable penile prosthesis into scarred corporeal bodies. Int J Impot Res 15 (2003) S125
12. Garber B.B., and Marcus S.M. Does surgical approach affect the incidence of inflatable penile prosthesis infection?. Urology 52 (1998) 291
13. Jarow J.P. Risk factors for penile prosthetic infection. J Urol 156 (1996) 402
14. Radomski S.B., and Herschorn S. Risk factors associated with penile prosthesis infection. J Urol 147 (1992) 383
15. Candela J.V., and Hellstrom W.J. Three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: a comparison of the penoscrotal and infrapubic surgical approaches. J La State Med Soc 148 (1996) 296
16. Mulhall J.P., Jahoda A., Aviv N., et al. The impact of sildenafil citrate on sexual satisfaction profiles in men with a penile prosthesis in situ. BJU Int 93 (2004) 97