Chitin complex for the remediation of mine impacted water: Geochemistry of metal removal and comparison with other common substrates

Applied Geochemistry

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 336-344

  Robinson Lora, Mary Ann ^a   Brennan, Rachel A ^a  

^a The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AL REMOVAL; AVERAGE RATE; COMPOSITE WASTES; CONTROLLED CONDITIONS; EQUIVALENT MASS; FIELD TRIAL; GEOCHEMICAL MODELING; IRON REMOVAL; LAG PERIOD; METAL REMOVAL; REDUCTION ACTIVITY; REDUCTION RATE; SPENT MUSHROOM COMPOST; WASTE STREAM; WATER RATIO;

ALKALINITY; CHEMICALS REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT); CHITIN; COMPOSTING; DEWATERING; DISSOLUTION; IRON COMPOUNDS; MANGANESE; MANGANESE COMPOUNDS; METAL RECOVERY; METALS; MINING; PH EFFECTS; POLLUTION; SODIUM; SORPTION;

SUBSTRATES;

ACIDITY; ALUMINUM; BIOREMEDIATION; CHEMICAL POLLUTANT; CHITIN; METAL BINDING; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; MICROCOSM; MINE DRAINAGE; MODEL TEST; PH; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; PRECIPITATION (CHEMISTRY); SUBSTRATE; THERMODYNAMICS; WATER CHEMISTRY;

BASIDIOMYCOTA; DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA);

EID: 75849144524     PISSN: 08832927     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2009.11.016     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ahumada I., Mendoza J., Escudero P., and Ascar L. Effect of acetate, citrate, and lactate incorporation on distribution of cadmium and copper chemical forms in soil. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant 32 (2001) 771-785
2. Allison, J.D., Brown, D.S., Novo-Gradac, K.J., 1990. MINTEQA2/PRODEFA2, A Geochemical Assessment Model for Environmental Systems: Version 3.0 User's Manual. US Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA.
3. APHA, 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st ed. American Public Health Association - American Water Works Association - Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC.
4. Batty L.C., and Younger P.L. The use of waste materials in the passive remediation of mine water pollution. Surv. Geophys. 25 (2004) 55-67
5. Benner S.G., Blowes D.W., Gould W.D., Herbert Jr. R.B., and Ptacek C.J. Geochemistry of a permeable reactive barrier for metals and acid mine drainage. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33 (1999) 2793-2799
6. Brennan R.A., Sanford R.A., and Werth C.J. Biodegradation of tetrachloroethene by chitin fermentation products in a continuous flow column system. Environ. Eng. - ASCE 132 (2006) 664-673
7. Chang I.S., Shin P.K., and Kim B.H. Biological treatment of acid mine drainage under sulphate-reducing conditions with solid waste materials as substrate. Water Res. 34 (2000) 1269-1277
8. Cocos I.A., Zagury G.J., Clement B., and Samson R. Multiple factor design for reactive mixture selection for use in reactive walls in mine drainage treatment. Water Res. 36 (2002) 167-177
9. Daubert L.N., and Brennan R.A. Passive remediation of acid mine drainage using crab shell chitin. Environ. Eng. Sci. 24 (2007) 1475-1480
10. Dvorak D.H., Hedin R.S., Edenborn H.M., and McIntire P.E. Treatment of metal-contaminated water using bacterial sulfate reduction: results from pilot-scale reactors. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 40 (2000) 609-616
11. Gibert O., de Pablo J., Cortina J.L., and Ayora C. Treatment of acid mine drainage by sulphate-reducing bacteria using permeable reactive barriers: a review from laboratory to full-scale experiments. Environ. Sci. Biol. Technol. 1 (2002) 327-333
12. Gibert O., de Pablo J., Cortina J.L., and Ayora C. Evaluation of municipal compost/limestone/iron mixtures as filling material for permeable reactive barriers for in-situ acid mine drainage treatment. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 78 (2003) 489-496
13. Gibert O., de Pablo J., Cortina J.L., and Ayora C. Chemical characterization of natural organic substrates for biological mitigation of acid mine drainage. Water Res. 38 (2004) 4186-4196
14. Gibert O., de Pablo J., Cortina J.L., and Ayora C. Municipal compost-based mixture for acid mine drainage bioremediation: metal retention mechanisms. Appl. Geochem. 20 (2005) 1648-1657
15. Johnson D.B., and Hallberg K.B. Acid mine drainage remediation options: a review. Sci. Total Environ. 338 (2005) 3-14
16. McCauley C.A., O'Sullivan A.D., Milke M.W., Weber P.A., and Trumm D.A. Sulfate and metal removal in bioreactors treating acid mine drainage dominated with iron and aluminum. Water Res. 43 (2009) 961-970
17. Neculita C.M., Zagury G.J., and Bussiere B. Passive treatment of acid mine drainage in bioreactors using sulfate-reducing bacteria: critical review and research needs. J. Environ. Qual. 36 (2007) 1-16
18. Ntougias S., Zervakis G.I., Kavroulakis N., Ehaliotis C., and Papadopoulou K.K. Bacterial diversity in spent mushroom compost assessed by amplified rDNA restriction analysis and sequencing of cultivated isolates. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 27 (2004) 746-754
19. Parkhurst, D.L., Appelo, C.A.J., 1999. User's Guide to PHREEQC (Version 2) - A Computer Program for Speciation, Batch-reaction, One-Dimension Transport and Inverse Geochemical Calculations: US Geol. Surv. Water-Resour. Invest. Rep. 99-4259.
20. Percot A., Viton C., and Domard A. Optimization of chitin extraction from shrimp shells. Biomacromolecules 4 (2003) 12-18
21. Pruden A., Messner N., Pereyra L., Hanson R.E., Hiibel S.R., and Reardon K.F. The effect of inoculum on the performance of sulfate-reducing columns treating heavy metal contaminated water. Water Res. 41 (2007) 904-914
22. Robinson-Lora M.A., and Brennan R.A. The use of crab-shell chitin for biological denitrification: batch and column tests. Bioresour. Technol. 100 (2009) 534-541
23. Robinson-Lora M.A., and Brennan R.A. Efficient metal removal and neutralization of acid mine drainage by crab-shell chitin under batch and continuous-flow conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 100 (2009) 5063-5071
24. Royse D.J., Sanchez J.E., Beelman R.B., and Davidson J. Re-supplementing and re-casing mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) compost for a second crop. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 24 (2008) 319-325
25. Skousen J., and Ziemkiewicz P. Performance of 116 passive treatment systems for acid mine drainage. Proc. American Society of Mining and Reclamation Breckenridge, CO, June 19-23 (2005), ASMR, Lexington, KY 1100-1133
26. Venot C., Figueroa L., Brennan R.A., Wildeman T.R., Reisman D., and Sieczkowski M. Comparing chitin and organic substrates on the national tunnel waters in Blackhawk, Colorado for manganese removal. In: Barnhisel R.I. (Ed). Proc. American Society of Mining and Reclamation Richmond, VA, New Opportunities to Apply Our Science, June 14-19, 2008 (2008), ASMR, Lexington, KY 1323-1351
27. Waybrant K.R., Blowes D.W., and Ptacek C.J. Selection of reactive mixtures for use in permeable reactive walls for treatment of mine drainage. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32 (1998) 1972-1979
28. Waybrant K.R., Ptacek C.J., and Blowes D.W. Treatment of mine drainage using permeable reactive barriers: column experiments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36 (2002) 1349-1356
29. Willow M.A., and Cohen R.R.H. pH, dissolved oxygen, and adsorption effects on metal removal in anaerobic bioreactors. J. Environ. Qual. 32 (2003) 1212-1221
30. Zagury G.J., Kulnieks V.I., and Neculita C.M. Characterization and reactivity assessment of organic substrates for sulphate-reducing bacteria in acid mine drainage treatment. Chemosphere 64 (2006) 944-954
31. Ziemkiewicz P., Skousen J., and Simmons J. Long-term performance of passive acid mine drainage treatment systems. Mine Water Environ. 22 (2003) 118-129