Discrepancy Between Local and Central Pathological Review of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

Journal of Urology

Volumn 183, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 952-957

  Kuroiwa, Kentaro ^a   Shiraishi, Taizo ^e   Ogawa, Osamu ^b   Usami, Michiyuki ^c   Hirao, Yoshihiko ^d   Naito, Seiji ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^c OSAKA MEDICAL CENTER FOR CANCER AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES   (Japan)

^d NARA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e MIE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

pathology; prostatectomy; prostatic neoplasms

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER INVASION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLEASON SCORE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; SEMINAL VESICLE; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 75849143599     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.024     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Kattan M.W., Wheeler T.M., and Scardino P.T. Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 17 (1999) 1499
2. Stephenson A.J., Scardino P.T., Eastham J.A., et al. Postoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 23 (2005) 7005
3. Walz J., Chun F.K., Klein E.A., et al. Nomogram predicting the probability of early recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 181 (2009) 601
4. Fine S.W., and Epstein J.I. A contemporary study correlating prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score. J Urol 179 (2008) 1335
5. King C.R. Patterns of prostate cancer biopsy grading: trends and clinical implications. Int J Cancer 90 (2000) 305
6. Lattouf J.B., and Saad F. Gleason score on biopsy: is it reliable for predicting the final grade on pathology?. BJU Int 90 (2002) 694
7. Paulson D.F. Impact of radical prostatectomy in the management of clinically localized disease. J Urol 152 (1994) 1826
8. San Francisco I.F., DeWolf W.C., Rosen S., et al. Extended prostate needle biopsy improves concordance of Gleason grading between prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy. J Urol 169 (2003) 136
9. Steinberg D.M., Sauvageot J., Piantadosi S., et al. Correlation of prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason grade in academic and community settings. Am J Surg Pathol 21 (1997) 566
10. Ekici S., Ayhan A., Erkan I., et al. The role of the pathologist in the evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens. Scand J Urol Nephrol 37 (2003) 387
11. van derKwast T.H., Collette L., Van Poppel H., et al. Impact of pathology review of stage and margin status of radical prostatectomy specimens (EORTC trial 22911). Virchows Arch 449 (2006) 428
12. Evans A.J., Henry P.C., van derKwast T.H., et al. Interobserver variability between expert urologic pathologists for extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in radical prostatectomy specimens. Am J Surg Pathol 32 (2008) 1503
13. Montironi R., van derKwast T., Boccon-Gibod L., et al. Handling and pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens. Eur Urol 44 (2003) 626
14. Epstein J.I., Allsbrook Jr. W.C., Amin M.B., et al. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29 (2005) 1228
15. Wheeler T.M., Dillioglugil O., Kattan M.W., et al. Clinical and pathological significance of the level and extent of capsular invasion in clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer. Hum Pathol 29 (1998) 856
16. Srigley J.R., Amin M.B., Epstein J.I., et al. Updated protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinomas of the prostate gland. Arch Pathol Lab Med 130 (2006) 936
17. Bolla M., van Poppel H., Collette L., et al. Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911). Lancet 366 (2005) 572
18. Messing E.M., Manola J., Yao J., et al. Immediate versus deferred androgen deprivation treatment in patients with node-positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Lancet Oncol 7 (2006) 472
19. Thompson Jr. I.M., Tangen C.M., Paradelo J., et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathologically advanced prostate cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 296 (2006) 2329
20. Boorjian S.A., Thompson R.H., Siddiqui S., et al. Long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era. J Urol 178 (2007) 864
21. Helpap B., and Egevad L. The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. Virchows Arch 449 (2006) 622
22. Ayala A.G., Ro J.Y., Babaian R., et al. The prostatic capsule: does it exist?. Its importance in the staging and treatment of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 13 (1989) 21