Evaluation of aquatic macrophyte community response to island construction in the upper mississippi river

Lake and Reservoir Management

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 313-320

  Langrehr, Heidi A ^a   Gray, Brian R ^b   Janvrin, Jeffrey A ^a  

^a WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (United States)

^b NATIONAL WILDLIFE HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Aquatic macrophyte; Detection probability; Habitat restoration; Island construction; LTRMP; Mississippi River; Zero inflated binomial (ZIB) model

Indexed keywords

EID: 75849140615     PISSN: 07438141     EISSN: 10402381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07438140709354019     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anderson, R. V., and Day, D. M., 1986. Predictive quality of macroinvertebrate–habitat associations in lower navigation pools of the Mississippi River. Hydrobiologia, 136:101–112.
2. Burnham, K. P., and Anderson, D. R., 1998. Model selection and inference:a practical information-theoretic approach 353New York:Springer-Verlag.
3. Cameron, A. C., and Trivedi, P. K., 1998. Regression analysis of count data 411New York:Cambridge.
4. Chambers, P. A., Prepas, E. E., Hamilton, H. R., and Bothwell, M. L., 1991. Current velocity and its effect on aquatic macrophytes in flowing water. Ecol. Appl., 1:249–257.
5. Coops, H., Boeters, R., and Smit, H., 1991. Direct and indirect effects of wave attack on helophytes. Aquat. Bot., 41:333–352.
6. Dewey, M. R., Richardson, W. B., and Zigler, S. J., 1997. Patterns of foraging and distribution of bluegill sunfish in a Mississippi River backwater:influence of macrophytes and predation. Ecol. Freshwat. Fish, 6:8–15.
7. Engel, S., 1990. Ecosystem responses to growth and control of submerged macrophytes:a literature review, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Technical Bulletin No. 170. 21
8. Gantes, H. P., and Caro, A. S., 2001. Environmental heterogeneity and spatial distribution of macrophytes in plain streams. Aquat. Bot., 70:225–236.
9. Hall, D. B., 2000. Zero-inflated Poisson and binomial regression with random effects:a case study. Biometrics, 56:1030–1039.
10. Holland, L. E., and Huston, M. L., 1984. Relationship of young-of-the-year northern pike to aquatic vegetation types in backwaters of the Upper Mississippi River. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 4:514–522.
11. Hurvich, C. M., and Tsai, C. L., 1989. Regression and time-series model selection in small samples. Biometrika, 76:297–307.
12. Jupp, B. P., and Spence, D. H.N., 1977. Limitations of macrophytes in a eutrophic lake, Loch Leven. II. Wave action, sediments and waterfowl grazing. J. Ecol., 65:431–446.
13. Keddy, P. A., 1982. Quantifying within-lake gradients of wave energy:interrelationships of wave energy, substrate particle size and shoreline plants in Axe Lake, Ontario. Aquat. Bot., 14:41–58.
14. Keskinkan, O., Goksu, M. Z.L., Basibuyuk, M., and Forster, C. F., 2004. Heavy metal adsorption properties of a submerged aquatic plant (Ceratophyllum demersum). Bioresour. Tech., 92:197–200.
15. Knapton, R. W., and Petrie, S. A., 1999. Changes in distribution and abundance of submerged macrophytes in the Inner Bay at Long Point, Lake Erie:implications for foraging waterfowl. J. Gt. Lakes Res., 25:783–798.
16. Korschgen, C. E., George, L. S., and Green, W. L., 1988. “ Feeding ecology of canvasbacks staging on Pool 7 of the Upper Mississippi River. ”. In Waterfowl in Winter Edited by:Weller, M. W., 237–249. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
17. Landin, M. C., Clairain, E. J., Jr. and Newling, C. J., 1989. Wetland habitat development and long-term monitoring at Windmill Point, Virginia. Wetlands, 9:13–25.
18. Madsen, J. D., Chambers, P. A., James, W. F., Koch, E. W., and Westlake, D. F., 2001. The interaction between water movement, sediment dynamics and submersed macrophytes. Hydrobiologia, 444:71–84.
19. Nadeau, S., Decarie, R., Lambert, D., and St-Georges, M., 1995. Nonlinear modeling of muskrat use of habitat. J. Wildl. Manage., 59:110–117.
20. Peck, J. H., and Smart, M. M., 1986. An assessment of the aquatic and wetland vegetation of the Upper Mississippi River. Hydrobiologia, 136:57–76.
21. Qiu, D., Wu, Z., Liu, B., Deng, J., Fu, G., and He, F., 2001. The restoration of aquatic macrophytes for improving water quality in a hypertrophic shallow lake in Hubei Province, China. Ecol. Eng., 18:147–156.
22. Rogers, S. J., 1994. Preliminary evaluation of submersed macrophyte changes in the Upper Mississippi River. Lake and Reserv. Manage., 10:35–38.
23. SAS Institute Inc. 2003. SAS OnlineDoc® 9.1 Cary, N. Car:SAS Institute Inc.
24. Smith, C., Douglas, A., and Jurajda, P., 2001. Oviposition site selection and embryo mortality in perch. J. Fish Biol., 58:880–882.
25. Sprenkle, E. S., Smock, L. A., and Anderson, J. E., 2004. Distribution and growth of submerged aquatic vegetation in the Piedmont section of the James River, Virginia. Southeast. Nat., 3:517–530.
26. Tyre, A. J., Tenhumberg, B., Field, S. A., Niejalke, D., Parris, K., and Possingham, H. P., 2003. Improving precision and reducing bias in biological surveys:estimating false-negative error rates. Ecol. Appl., 13:1790–1801.
27. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1989. Upper Mississippi River System Pool 8 Island Construction–Phase I–Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement Project 35St. Paul, Minnesota:U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. + Attachments 1–2 + Appendixes A-B
28. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1996. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program–Pool 8 Island Phase II–Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement Project 115–9. St. Paul, Minnesota:U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. + Attachments 1
29. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1997. Report to Congress–An evaluation of the upper Mississippi River system environmental management program 101Illinois:U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Rock Island. + Attachments 1–7 + Appendixes A-B
30. U.S. Geological Survey. 2005. UMESC data library February 4, http://www.umesc.usgs.gov/data_library/data_library.html. Accessed:March 7, 2005
31. Yin, Y., and Langrehr, H. A., 2005. Multiyear synthesis of the aquatic vegetation component from 1991 to 2002 for the Long Term Resource Monitoring Program 29La Crosse, Wisconsin:U.S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center. pp + Appendixes A-F LTRMP 2005-T001
32. Yin, Y., Winkelman, J. S., and Langrehr, H. A., 2000. Long Term Resource Monitoring Program procedures:Aquatic vegetation monitoring 8La Crosse, Wisconsin:U.S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center. April 2000. LTRMP 95-P002–7. + Appendixes A-C
33. Zurayk, R., Sukkariyah, B., and Baalbaki, R., 2001. Common hydrophytes as bioindicators of nickel, chromium and cadmium pollution. Water Air Soil Pollut., 127:373–388.