Importance of macroalgae subsidy on the abundance and population biology of the amphipod Orchestoidea tuberculata (Nicolet) in sandy beaches of south central Chile;Importancia del subsidio de macroalgas sobre la abundancia y biología poblacional del anfípodo Orchestoidea tuberculata (Nicolet) en playas arenosas del centro sur de Chile

Revista de Biologia Marina y Oceanografia

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 691-702

  Duarte, Cristian ^a   Jaramillo, Eduardo ^a   Contreras, Heraldo ^b   Acuña, Karin ^a   Navarro, Jorge M ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUSTRAL DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b INSTITUTO DE FOMENTO PESQUERO   (Chile)

Author keywords

Morphodynamic state; Stranded macroalgae; Trophic subsidy

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; AMPHIPOD; BEACH; BIOMASS; FOOD AVAILABILITY; INTERTIDAL ENVIRONMENT; JUVENILE; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MACROALGA; MORPHODYNAMICS; TROPHIC STATUS;

CHILE; LOS RIOS [CHILE]; VALDIVIA;

AMPHIPODA; ORCHESTOIDEA TUBERCULATA; TALITRIDAE;

EID: 75849129554     PISSN: 07173326     EISSN: 07181957     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Anderson WB & GA Polis. 1998. Marine subsidies of island communities in the Gulf of California: evidence from stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes. Oikos 81: 75-80.
2. Bascom W. 1980. Waves and beaches, 366 pp. Anchor Press, New York.
3. Brown A & A McLachlan. 1990. Ecology of sandy shores, 328 pp. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.
4. Bustamante RH & GM Branch. 1996. The dependence of intertidal consumers on kelp-derived organic matter on the west coast of South Africa. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 196: 1-28.
5. Bustamante RH, GM Branch & S Aekhout. 1995. Maintenance of an exceptional grazer biomass on South African intertidal shores: trophic subsidy by subtidal kelps. Ecology 76: 2314-2329.
6. Carr MR. 1997. Primer user manual, 40 pp. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth.
7. Castilla JC. 1999. Coastal marine communities: trends and perspectjves from human-exclusion experiments. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14: 280-283.
8. Chaudron Y, SA Poulet, M Laabir, A Lanora & A Miralto. 1996. Is hatching success of copepod eggs diatom density-dependent? Marine Ecology Progress Series 144: 185-193.
9. Clarke KR & RM Warwick. 1994. Change in marine communities: An approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 144 pp. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth.
10. Colombini I, A Aloia, M Fallaci, G Pezzoli & L Chelazzi. 2000. Temporal and spatial use of stranded wrack by the macrofauna of a tropical sandy beach. Marine Biology 136: 531-541.
11. Contreras H, E Jaramillo, C Duarte & A McLachlan. 2003. Population abundances, growth and natural mortality of the crustacean macrofauna at two sand beach morphodynamic types in southem Chile. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 76: 543-561.
12. Cruz-Rivera E & MH Hay. 2000. The effects of diet mixing on consumer fitness: macroalgae, epiphytes, and animal matters as food for marine amphipods. Oecologia 123: 252-264.
13. Defeo O & J Gómez. 2005. Morphodynamics and habitat safety in sandy beaches: life-history adaptations in a supralittoral amphipod. Marine Ecology Progress Series 293: 143-153.
14. Defeo O & M Rueda. 2002. Spatial structure, sampling design and abundance estimates in sandy beach macroinfauna: some warnings and new perspectives. Marine Biology 140: 1215-1225.
15. Defeo O, A Brazeiro, A De Alava & G Riostra. 1997. Is sandy beach macrofauna only physically controlled? Role of substrate and competition in isopods. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 45: 453-462.
16. Defeo O, D Lercari & J Gómez. 2003. The role of morphodynamics in structuring sandy beach populations and communities: what should be expected? Journal of Coastal Research (Special Issue) 35: 352-362.
17. Duarte W. 1974. Orchestoidea tuberculata Nicolet, 1849 como organismo desintegrador de algas (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Talitridae). Nota Mensual Museo Nacional de Historia Natural (Chile) 220-221: 3-9.
18. Duarte C, E Jaramillo & H Contreras. 2008. Macroalgas varadas sobre la superficie de una playa arenosa del sur de Chile: preferencias alimentarias y de hábitat de juveniles y adultos de Orchestoidea tuberculata (Nicolet), (Amphipoda, Talitridae). Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 80: 69-81.
19. Dugan J, DM Hubbard, MD McCrary & MO Pierson. 2003. The response of macrofauna communities and shorebirds to macrophyte wrack subsidies on exposed sandy beach of southern California. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 58: 25-40.
20. Duggins DO, CA Simenstad & JA Estes. 1989. Magnification of secondary production by kelp detritus in coastal marine ecosystems. Science 41: 170-173.
21. Emery KO. 1938. Rapid method of mechanical analysis of sands. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 8: 105-111.
22. Emery KO. 1961. A simple method of measuring beach profiles. Limnology and Oceanography 6: 90-93.
23. Fairweather PG & GP Quinn. 1992. Seascape ecology: the importance of linkages. En: Battershill CN (ed). Proceedings of the Second International Temperate Reef Symposium, 7-10 January, 1992, pp. 77-83, NIWA Marine, Auckland.
24. Gibbs RJ, MD Mathews & DA Link. 1971. The relationship between sphere size and settling velocity. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 41: 7-18.
25. Griffiths CL & J Stenton-Dozey. 1981. The fauna and rate of degradation of stranded kelp. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 12: 645-653.
26. Griffiths CL, J Stenton-Dozey & K Koop. 1983. Kelp wrack and the flow of energy through a sandy beach ecosystem. En: McLachlan A & T Erasmus (eds). Sandy beaches as ecosystems, pp. 547-556. Dr. W Junk Publishers, The Hague.
27. Ince RT, GA Hyndes, PS Lavery & MA Vanderklift. 2007. Marine macrophytes directly enhance abundances of sandy beach fauna through provision of food and habitat. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 74: 77-86.
28. Inglis G. 1989. The colonisation and degradation of stranded Macrocystis pyrifera (L) C. Ag. by the macrofauna of a New Zealand sandy beach. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 125: 203-217.
29. Jaramillo E. 1987. Community ecology of Chilean sandy beaches. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of New Hampshire, Durham, 216 pp.
30. Jaramillo E & A McLachlan. 1993. Community and population responses of the macrofauna to physical factors over a range of exposed sandy beaches in south-central Chile. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 37: 615-624.
31. Jaramillo E, C Duarte & H Contreras. 2000. Sandy beach macrofauna from the coast of Ancud, Isla de Chiloé, southern Chile. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 73: 771-786.
32. Jaramillo E, H Contreras, C Duarte & P Quijón. 2001. Relationships between community structure of the intertidal macrofauna and sandy beach characteristics along the Chilean Coast. Marine Ecology 22: 323-342.
33. Jaramillo E, H Contreras, C Duarte & MH Avellanal. 2003. Locomotor activity and zonation of upper shore arthropods in a sandy beach of north central Chile. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 58: 177-197.
34. Jaramillo E, W Stotz, C Bertran, J Navarro, C Roman & C Vareta. 1980. Actividad locomotríz de Orchestoidea tuberculata (Amphipoda, Talitridae) sobre la superficie de una playa arenosa del sur de Chile (Mehuín, Valdivia). Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 15: 9-33.
35. Koop K & JG Field. 1980. The influence of food availability on population dynamics of a supralittoral isopod Ligia dilatata Brand. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 48: 61-72.
36. Lastra M, HM Page, J Dugan, DM Hubbard & F Rodil. 2008. Processing of allochthonous macrophyte subsidies by sandy beach consumer: estimates of feeding rates and impacts on food resources. Marine Biology 154: 163-174.
37. Lewin R. 1986. Supply-side ecology. Science 234: 25-27.
38. Marques JC, SC Gonçalves, MA Pardal, L Chelazzi, I Colombini, M Fallaci, MF Bouslama, M El Gtari, F Charfi-Cheikhruha & F Sacapini. 2003. Comparison of Talitrus saltator (Amphipoda, Talitridae) biology, dynamics, and secondary production in Atlantic (Portugal) and Mediterranean (Italy and Tunisia) populations. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 58 (Suppl. 1): 127-148.
39. McArdle S & A McLachlan. 1991. Dynamics of the swash zone and effluent line on sandy beaches. Marine Ecology Progress Series 76: 91-99.
40. McArdle S & A McLachlan. 1992. Sandy beach ecology: swash features relevant to the macrofauna. Journal of Coastal Research 8: 398-407.
41. McLachlan A. 1990. Dissipative beaches and macrofauna communities on exposed intertidal sands. Journal of Coastal Research 6: 57-71.
42. McLachlan A & E Jaramillo. 1995. Zonation on sandy beaches. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 33: 305-335.
43. McLachlan A, A De Ruyck & N Hacking. 1996. Community structure on sandy beaches: patterns of richness and zonation in relation to tide range and latitude. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 69: 451-467.
44. McLachlan A, E Jaramillo, TE Donn & F Wessels. 1993. Sand beach macrofauna communities: a geographical comparison. Journal of Coastal Research, (Special Issue) 15: 27-38.
45. McLachlan A, M Fisher, H Al-Habsi, S Al-Shukairi & A Al-Habsi. 1998. Ecology of sandy beaches in Oman. Journal of Coastal Conservation 4: 181-190.
46. Menge BA. 1992. Community regulation: under what conditions are bottom-up factors important on rocky shores? Ecology 73: 755-765.
47. Moreno C. 2001. Community patterns generated by human harvesting on Chilean shores: a review. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 11: 19-30.
48. Nielsen KJ & SA Navarrete. 2004. Mesoscale regulation comes from the bottom-up: intertidal interactions between consumers and upwelling. Ecology Letters 7: 31-41.
49. Orr M, M Zimmer, D Jelinski & M Mews. 2005. Wrack deposition on different beach types: spatial and temporal variation in the pattern of subsidy. Ecology 86: 1496-1507.
50. Polis GA & SD Hurd. 1995. Extraordinarily high spider densities on islands: flow of energy from the marine to terrestrial food webs and the absence of predation. Proceedings from the National Academy of Science of the United States 92: 4382-4386.
51. Polis GA, WB Anderson & RD Holt. 1997. Toward an integration of landscape and food web ecology: the dynamics of spatially subsidized food webs. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematic 28: 289-316.
52. Polis GA, RD Holt, BA Menge & KO Winemiller. 1995. Time, space, and life history: influences on food webs. En: Polis GA & K Winemiller (eds). Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics, pp. 435-460, Chapman & Hall, London.
53. Rodríguez S. 2000. Transferencia de recursos alimentarios entre diferentes ambientes del ecosistema marino. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 73: 199-207.
54. Rodríguez S. 2003. Consumption of drift kelp by intertidal populations of the sea urchin Tetrapygus niger on the central Chilean coast: possible consequences at different ecological levels. Marine Ecology Progress Series 251: 141-151.
55. Rossi F & AJ Underwood. 2002. Small-scale disturbance and increased nutrients as influences on intertidal macrobenthic assemblages: experimental burial of wrack in different intertidal environments. Marine Ecology Progress Series 241: 29-39.
56. Schoeman DS & AJ Richardson. 2002. Investigating biotic and abiotic factors affecting the recruitment of an intertidal clam on an exposed sandy beach using a generalized additive model. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 276: 67-81.
57. Seward-Thompson B & J Hails. 1973. An appraisal on the computation of statistical parameters in grain size analysis. Sedimentology 11: 83-98.
58. Short A. 1996. The role of wave height, period, slope, tide range and embaymentisation in beach classifications: a review. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 69: 589-604.
59. Short A. 2006. Australian beach system-nature and distribution. Journal of Coastal Research 22: 11-27.
60. Varela C. 1983. Anfípodos de las playas del arena del sur de Chile (Bahía de Maiquillahue, Valdivia). Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 18: 25-52.
61. Vetter EW & PK Dayton. 1999. Organic enrichment by macrophyte detritus, and abundance patterns of megafaunal populations in submarine canyons. Marine Ecology Progress Series 186: 137-148
62. Zar H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis, 662 pp. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River.