Outcome- and auxiliary-dependent subsampling and its statistical inference

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1132-1150

  Wang, Xiaofei ^a   Wu, Yougui ^b   Zhou, Haibo ^c  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^c IL   (United States)

Author keywords

Auxiliary variable; Biomarker; Outcome and auxiliary dependent subsampling; Population based studies; Semiparametric empirical likelihood

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ARTICLE; BIOASSAY; COST; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARAMETRIC TEST; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SEMIPARAMETRIC EMPIRICAL LIKELIHOOD METHOD; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; PATIENT SELECTION;

EID: 75749153005     PISSN: 10543406     EISSN: 15205711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10543400903243025     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Breslow, N. E., Cain, K. C. (1988). Logistic regression for two-stage case-control data. Biometrika 75:11-20.
2. Breslow, N. E., Day, N. E. (1980). Statistical Methods in Cancer Research I : The Analysis of Case-Control Studies. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon. p. 338.
3. Breslow, N. C., Holubkov, R. (1997). Maximum likelihood estimation of logistic regression parameters under two-phase, outcome-dependent sampling. J. Roy. Statist. Society B 59:447-461
4. Breslow, N. E., Chatterjee, N. (1999). Design and analysis of two-phase studies with binary outcome applied to Wilms tumor prognosis. Appl. Statist. 48:457-468.
5. Cosslett, S. R. (1981). Maximum likelihood estimator for choice-based samples. Econometrica 49:1289-1316.
6. Eberhard, D. A., Giaccone, G., Johnson, B. E., on behalf of the Molecular Assays in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Working Group. (2008). Biomarkers of response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in nonsmall-cell lung cancer: Standardization for use in the clinical trial setting. J. Clin. Oncol. 26(6):983-994.
7. Flanders, W. D., Greenland, S. (1991). Analytic methods for two-stage case-control studies and other stratified designs. Statist. Med. 10:739-747.
8. Foutz, R. V. (1977). On the unique consistent solution to the likelihood equations. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 72:147-148.
9. Horvitz, D. G., Thompson, D. J. (1952). A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 47:663-685.
10. Jänne, P. A., Wang, X. F., Kratzke, R. (2008). Evaluation of EGFR and K-ras mutations in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Unpublished CALGB Study Concept.
11. Little, R. J. A., Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: Wiley.
12. Longnecker, M. P., Klebnoff, M. A., Zhou, H., Brock, J. W. (2002). Maternal serum level of the DDT metabolite DDE is associated with preterm and small-for-gestational-age birth. Am. J. Epidemiol. 155:311-322.
13. Niswander, K. R., Gordon, M. (1972). The Women and their Pregnancies. USDHEW Publication No. (NIH) 73-379. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
14. Owen, A. B. (1988). Empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for a single functional. Biometrika 75:237-249.
15. Owen, A. B. (1990). Empirical likelihood for confidence regions. Ann. Statist. 18:90-120.
16. Paez, J. G., Jänne, P. A., Lee, J. C., Tracy, S., Greulich, H., Gabriel, S., Herman, P., Kaye, F. J., Lindeman, N., Boggon, T. J., Naoki, K., Sasaki, H., Fujii, Y., Eck, M. J., Sellers, W. R., Johnson, B. E., Meyerson, M. (2004). EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 304:1497-1500.
17. Prentice, R. L. (1986). A case-cohort design for epidemiologic cohort studies and disease prevention trials. Biometrika 73:1-11.
18. Prentice, R. L., Pyke, R. (1979). Logistic disease incidence models and case-control studies. Biometrika 66:403-411.
19. Qin, J., Lawless, J. F. (1994). Empirical likelihood and general estimating equations. Ann. Statist. 22:300-325.
20. Scott, A. J., Wild, C. J. (1997). Fitting regression models to case-control data by maximum likelihood. Biometrika 84:57-71.
21. Wang, X. F., Zhou, H. B. (2006). A semiparametric empirical likelihood method for biased sampling schemes in epidemiologic studies with auxiliary covariates. Biometrics 62(4):1149-1160.
22. Wang, X. F., Zhou, H. B. (2009). Design and inference for cancer biomarker study with an outcome/auxiliary-dependent subsampling. Biometrics, in press. Available online at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19508239
23. Weaver, M. A., Zhou, H. B. (2005). An estimated likelihood method for continuous outcome regression models with outcome-dependent sampling. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 100:459-469.
24. Weinberg, C. R., Wacholder, S. (1993). Prospective analysis of case-control data under general multiplicative-intercept risk models. Biometrika 80:461-465.
25. Wild, C. J. (1991). Fitting prospective regression models to case-control data. Biometrika 78:705-717.
26. White, J. E. (1982). A two stage design for the study of the relationship between a rare exposure and a rare disease. Am. J. Epidemiol. 115:119-128.
27. Zhao, L. P., Lipsitz, S. (1992). Designs and analysis of two-stage studies. Statist. Med. 11:769-782.
28. Zhou, H., Weaver, M. A. (2001). Outcome dependent selection models. Encyclopedia of Environmetrics 3:1499-1502.
29. Zhou, H., Weaver, M. A., Qin, J., Longnecker, M. P., Wang, M. C. (2002). A semiparametric empirical likelihood method for data from an outcome-dependent sampling design with a continuous outcome. Biometrics 58:413-421.
30. Zhou, H., Chen, J., Rissanen, T., Korrick, S., Hu, H., Salonen, J. T., Longnecker, M. P. (2007). An efficient sampling and inference procedure for studies with a continuous outcome. Epidemiology 18(4):461-468.