Identity salience moderates processing of group-relevant information

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 441-444

  Maitner, Angela T ^a   Mackie, Diane M ^b   Claypool, Heather M ^c   Crisp, Richard J ^d  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF SHARJAH   (United Arab Emirates)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Information processing; Social identity

Indexed keywords

EID: 75749143791     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.11.010     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Alvaro E.M., and Crano W.D. Cognitive responses to minority- or majority-based communications: Factors that underlie minority influence. British Journal of Social Psychology 35 (1996) 105-121
2. Alvaro E.M., and Crano W.D. Indirect minority influence. Evidence for leniency in source evaluation and counterargumentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72 (1997) 949-964
3. Brown R. Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology 30 (2000) 745-778
4. Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E., Kao C.F., and Rodriguez R. Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (1986) 1032-1043
5. Chaiken S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (1980) 752-766
6. Chaiken S., Liberman A., and Eagly A.H. Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In: Uleman J., and Bargh J. (Eds). Unintended thought (1989), Guilford, New York 212-252
7. Crano W.D., and Alvaro E.M. The context/comparison model of social influence. Mechanisms, structure, and linkages that underlie indirect attitude change. In: Stroebe W., and Hewstone M. (Eds). European review of social psychology (1998), John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, NJ 175-202
8. David B., and Turner J.C. Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: Is being a member of the out-group an advantage?. British Journal of Social Psychology 35 (1996) 179-199
9. Fujioka Y. Emotional TV viewing and minority audience. How Mexican Americans process and evaluate TV news about in-group members. Communication Research 32 (2005) 566-593
10. James W. Principles of psychology Vols. 1-2 (1890), Holt, New York
11. Jarvis, B. (2006). MediaLab (Version 2004) [Computer software]. New York: Empirisoft Corp.
12. Johnson B.T., and Eagly A.H. Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 106 (1989) 290-314
13. Mackie D.M. Social identification effects in group polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 (1986) 720-728
14. Mackie D.M., Gastardo-Conaco M.C., and Skelly J.J. Knowledge of the advocated position and the processing of in-group and out-group persuasive messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 18 (1992) 145-151
15. Mackie D.M., and Queller S. The impact of group membership on persuasion: Revisiting who says what to whom with what effect ?. In: Terry D.J., and Hogg M.A. (Eds). Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 135-155
16. Mackie D.M., Worth L.T., and Asuncion A.G. Processing of persuasive in-group messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58 (1990) 812-822
17. McGarty C., Haslam S.A., Hutchinson K.J., and Turner J.C. The effects of salient group memberships on persuasion. Small Group Research 25 (1994) 267-293
18. Petty R.E., and Cacioppo J.T. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In: Berkowitz L. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology, 19 (1986), Academic Press, New York 124-203
19. Petty R.E., Cacioppo J.T., and Goldman R. Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41 (1981) 847-855
20. Pickett C.L., Gardner W.L., and Knowles M. Getting a clue: The need to belong and enhanced sensitivity to social cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30 (2004) 1095-1107
21. Ray D.G., Mackie D.M., Rydell R.J., and Smith E.R. Changing categorization of self can change emotions about outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44 (2008) 1210-1213
22. Shih M., Pittinsky T.L., and Ambady N. Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science 10 (1999) 80-83
23. Turner J.C., Hogg M.A., Oakes P.J., Reicher S.D., and Wetherell M.S. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (1987), Blackwell, Oxford, England
24. Van Knippenberg D., Lossie N., and Wilke H. In-group prototypicality and persuasion: Determinants of heuristic and systematic message processing. British Journal of Social Psychology 33 (1994) 289-300
25. Van Knippenberg D., and Wilke H. Prototypicality of arguments and conformity to ingroup norms. European Journal of Social Psychology 22 (1992) 141-155