Quality of experience from user and network perspectives

Annales des Telecommunications/Annals of Telecommunications

Volumn 65, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 47-57

  Shaikh, Junaid ^a   Fiedler, Markus ^a   Collange, Denis ^b  

^a BLEKINGE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b ORANGE LABS   (France)

Author keywords

Opinion Score; Passive measurements; Quality of Experience; Quality of Service; Traffic analysis

Indexed keywords

DOWNLOAD TIME; EXPERIMENTAL PLATFORM; NETWORK LEVEL PERFORMANCE; OPERATIONAL NETWORK; PASSIVE MEASUREMENTS; PREVIOUS YEAR; QUALITY OF EXPERIENCES; TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS; USER BEHAVIOUR; USER EXPERIENCE; USER SATISFACTION; USER SESSIONS;

BENCHMARKING; NETWORK PERFORMANCE;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 75749129361     PISSN: 00034347     EISSN: 19589395     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12243-009-0142-x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Arlos P (2005) On the quality of computer network measurements. Ph.D. Thesis, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden
2. Collange D, Costeux JL (2007) Correlation of packet losses with some traffic characteristics. Proceedings of the Passive and Active Measurements Conference (PAM 2007), Louvaine-la-Neuve, Belgium
3. Collange D, Costeux JL (2008) Passive estimation of quality of experience. J Univers Comput Sci 625-641
4. Fasterfox-performance and network tweaks for Firefox. http://fasterfox.mozdev. org/ (last seen: July 21, 2009)
5. Fiedler M, Chevul S, Isaksson L, Lindberg P, Karlsson J (2005) Generic communication requirements of ITS-Related Mobile Services as Basis for Seamless Communication. Proceedings of the 1st EuroNGI conference on Next Generation Internet Networks (NGI'05), Rome, Italy, pp. 426-433
6. Fiedler M, Chevul S, Radtke O, Tutschku K, Binzenhöfer A (2005) The network utility function: a practicable concept for assessing network impact on distributed services. Proceedings of the 19th International Teletraffic Congress (ITC-19), Beijing, China
7. Garcia J, Hurtig P, Brunström A (2008) The effect of packet loss on the response time of web services. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technology (WebIST2007)
8. Hofeld T, Tran-Gia P, Fiedler M (2007) Quantification of Quality of Experience for edge-based applications. Proceedings of the 20th International Teletraffic Congress (ITC-20), Ottawa, Canada
9. Hubert B (2002) Linux advanced routing and traffic control. Proceedings of Ottawa Linux Symposium, Ottawa, Canada, pp. 213-222
10. International Telecommunication Union (2001). ITU-T Recommendation G. 1010: end-user multimedia QoS categories
11. International Telecommunication Union (2005). ITU-T Recommendation G. 1030: estimating end-to-end performance in IP networks for data applications
12. International Telecommunication Union (2003). ITU-T Recommendation P.800.1: mean Opinion Score (MOS) terminology
13. Khirman S, Henriksen P (2002) Relationship between Quality-of-Service and Quality-of-Experience for Public Internet Service. Proceedings of Passive and Active Measurement (PAM2002), Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
14. Nychis G, Sardesai G, Seshan S (2009) Analysis of XCP in a wireless environment. http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~gnychis/xcp-wireless.pdf (last seen: July 21)
15. Padhye J, Firoiu V, Towsley D, Kurose J (1998) Modelling TCP throughput: a simple model and its empirical validation. ACM Sigcomm, Vancouver Canada, pp. 303-314
16. Rossi D, Mellia M, Casetti C 2003() User patience and the web. Proceedings of IEEE GLOBECOM, San Francisco, USA
17. The Netem Network Emulator. http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/Netem (last seen: July 21, 2009)
18. Vicari N, Köhler S (2000) Measuring internet user traffic behavior dependent on access speed. 13th ITC Specialist Seminar on IP Traffic Measurement, Modeling and Management, Monterey, CA, USA