Local orientation distribution as a function of spatial scale for detection of masses in mammograms

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1613, Issue , 1999, Pages 280-293

  Karssemeijer, Nico ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL IMAGING; X RAY SCREENS;

COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH; CONTINUOUS FUNCTIONS; EFFICIENT COMPUTATION; FINE-SCALE; LOCAL ORIENTATION DISTRIBUTIONS; LOCAL ORIENTATION PATTERNS; MASS DETECTION; SPATIAL SCALE;

CHEMICAL DETECTION;

EID: 75749124344     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-48714-x_21     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Tabar, L., Fagerberg, G., and Day, N.E.: Breast cancer treatment and natural history: new insights from results ofscreening. Lancet 339 (1992) 412-414
2. Bird, R. E., Wallace, T.W., and Yankaskas, B.C.: Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 184 (1992) 613-617
3. van Dijck, J. A. M., Verbeek, L. M., Hendriks, J. H. C. L., and Holland R.:The current detectability of breast cancer in a mammographic screening program. Cancer 72 (1993) 1933-1938
4. Harvey, J. E., Fajardo, L. L., and Inis, C. A.: Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. AJR 161 (1993)1167-1172
5. Roehrig, J., Doi, T., Hasegawa, A., Hunt, B., Marshall, J., Romsdahl, H., Schnei-der, A., Sharbaugh, R., and Zang, W.: Clinical results with r2 imagechecker in support of fda pma application. In N Karssemeijer, MAO Thijssen, JHCL Hen- driks, and LJTO van Erning, editors, Digital Mammography, Kluwer, Dordrecht, (1998)395-400
6. Vitak, B.: Invasive interval cancers in the Östergötland mammographic screening programme: Radiological analysis. European Radiology 8 (1998) 639-646
7. Thurfjell, E. L., Lernevall, K. A., and Taube, A. A. S.: Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology 191 (1994)241-244
8. Chan, H. P., Doi, K., Vyborny, C. J., Schmidt, R. A., Metz, C. E., Lam, K. L., Ogura, T., Wu, T., and Macmahon, H.: Improvement in radiologist’s detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. Inv Radiol 25 (1990) 1102-1110
9. Astley, S., Hutt, I., Adamson, S., Rose, P., Miller, P., Boggis, C., Taylor, C., Valen- tine, T., and Davies, J.: Automation in mammography: computer vision and human perception. SPIE 1905 (1993) 716-730
10. Kegelmeyer, W. P., Pruneda, J. M., Bourland, P. D., Hillis, A., Riggs, M.W., and Nipper, M. L.: Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. Radiology 191 (1994) 331-337
11. Dean, P. B.: Overview of breast cancer screening. In K Doi, M L Giger, R M Nishikawa, and R A Schmidt, editors, Digital Mammography, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1996)19-26
12. Lau, T. K., and Bischof, W. F.: Automated detection of breast tumors using the asymmetry approach. Comp and Biomed Research 24 (1991) 273-295
13. Yin, F F., Giger, M. L., Doi, K., Metz, C. E., Vyborny, C. J., and Schmidt, R. A.: Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: Analysis of bilateral substraction images. Med Phys 18 (1991) 955-963
14. Miller, P., and Astley, S. M.: Automated detection of mammographic asymmetry using anatomical features. Int. Journal of Pattern Recognition and AI 7 (1992) 1461-1476
15. Karssemeijer, N., and te Brake, G. M.: Detection of stellate distortions in mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imag 15 (1996) 611-619
16. Miller, L., and Ramsey, N.: The detection of malignant masses by non-linear multiscale analysis. In K Doi, M L Giger, R M Nishikawa, and R A Schmidt, editors, Digital Mammography, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1996) 335-340
17. Petrick, N., Chan, H. P., Sahiner, B., and Wei, D.: An adaptive density-weighted contrast enhancement filter for mammographic breast mass detection. IEEE Trans Med Imag 15 (1996) 59-67
18. Vujovic, N., and Brzakovic, D.: Establishing the correspondence between control points in pairs of mammographic images. IEEE Trans Imag Processing 6 (1997) 1388-1399
19. te Brake, G. M., and Karssemeijer, N.: Detection of stellate breast abnormalities.In K Doi, M L Giger, R M Nishikawa, and R A Schmidt, editors, Digital Mammography, Elsevier, Amsterdam, (1996) 341-346
20. Karssemeijer, N.: Detection of stellate distortions in mammograms using scale space operators. In Y Bizais, C Barrilot, and R Di Paola, editors, Information Processing in Medical Imaging, Kluwer, Dordrecht (1995) 335-346
21. Laine, A. F., Schuler, S., Fan, J., and Huda, W.: Mammographic feature enhancement by multiscale enhancement. IEEE Trans on Med Imag 13 (1994) 725-740
22. Laine, A., Huda, W., Chen, D. W., and Harris, J.: Segmentation of masses using continuous scale representations. In K Doi, M L Giger, R M Nishikawa, and R A Schmidt, editors, Digital Mammography, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1996) 447-450
23. Wei, D., Chan, H. P., Helvie, M. A., Sahiner, B., Petrick, N., Adler, D. D., and Goodsitt, M. M.: Classification of mass and normal breast tissue on digital mam- mograms: multiresolution texture analysis. Med Phys 22 (1995) 1501-1513
24. Karssemeijer, N., and te Brake, G.M.: Combining single view features and asymmetry for detection of mass lesions. In N Karssemeijer, MAO Thijssen, JHCL Hen- driks, and LJTO van Erning, editors, Digital Mammography, Kluwer, Dordrecht (1998)95-102
25. Suckling, J., Parker, J., Dance, D. R., Astley, S., Hutt, I., Boggis, C. R. M., Ricketts, I., Stamatakis, E., Cerneaz, N., Kok, S L., Taylor, P., Betal, D., and Savage, J.: The mammographic image analysis society digital mammogram database. In G Gale, S M Astley, D R Dance, and A Y Cairns, editors, Digital Mammography, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1994) 375-378