Multicriteria model for evaluating quality management of professional training;Daugiakriterinis profesinio mokymo kokybės valdymo vertinimo modelis

Business: Theory and Practice

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 88-96

  Andriušaitiene, Daiva ^a   Ginevičiene, Vanda Birute ^a   Šileika, Algis ^a  

^a VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Multicriteria methods; Professional training; Quality control

Indexed keywords

EID: 75749095614     PISSN: 16480627     EISSN: 18224202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/1648-0627.2008.9.88-96     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Beuthe, M.; Scannella, G. 2001. Comparative analysis of UTA multicriteria methods, European Journal of Operational Research 130: 246-262. (Pubitemid 32195789)
2. Brans, J. P.; Vincke, P. H.; Mareschal, B. 1986. How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method, European Journal of Operational Research 24: 228-238. (Pubitemid 16494701)
3. Fan, Z.; Ma, J.; Tian, P. A 1977. Subjective and objective integrated approach fot the determination of attribute weights, in Materials of 4th Conferense of International Society for Decision Support Systems.
4. Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2001. Complex evaluation of economical-social development of Lithuanian regions, Statyba [Civil Engineering] 7(4): 304-309.
5. Ginevičius, R., Podvezko, V. 2003. Quantitative evaluation of significance of hierarchically structured indexes, Modelling and Simulation of Business Systems: international conference, May 13-14, 2003, Vilnius, Lithuania / Kaunas University of Technology, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Institute of Mathematics and Informatics, Law University of Lithuania, Lithuanian Operational Research Society within EURO (LitORS), The Association of European Operational Research Societies, Baltic Operational Research Society (BaItORS). Kaunas: Technologija, 22-25.
6. Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V.; Mikelis, D. 2004. Quantitative evaluation of economic and social development of Lithuanian regions, Ekonomika: mokslo darbai 65: 67-81.
7. Ginevičius, R.; Gudačiauskas, D. 2004. Brand valuation model, Journal of Business Economics and Management 5(3): 143-153.
8. Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2004a. Determination of weightiness of the hierarchically-structured organization according to its commercial activity, Foundations of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Publishing House of Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, 21-33.
9. Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2004b. I̧moniu̧ strateginio potencialo kiekybinis i̧vertinimas, Verslas: teorija ir praktika 5(1): 3-9.
10. Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2005. Daugiakriterinio vertinimo rodikliu̧ sistemos formavimas, Verslas: teorija ir praktika 6(4): 199-207.
11. Hokkannen, J.; Salminen, P. 1997. ELECTRE III and IV decision aids in an environmental problem, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 5(6): 215-226. (Pubitemid 127095829)
12. Hwang, C. L.; Yoon, K. 1981. Multiple Attribute Decision MakingMethods and Applications. A State of the Art Surwey Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
13. Hwang, C. L.; Lin, M. J. 1987. Group Decision Making under Multiple Criteria: Methods and Applications. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
14. Larichov, O. I.; Moshkovich, H. M. 1977. Verbal Decision Analysis for Unstructured Problems. Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston.
15. Opricovič, S.; Tzeng, G.-H. 2004. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKON and TOPSIS, EJOR, European Journal of Operational Research 156: 445-455.
16. Roy, B. 1996. Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding./ Kluwer Academic Publishers Dortrecht.
17. Ustinovičius, L. 2001. Multi-criteria analysis of the efficiency of construction investments, in Almanach des praktischen Managements in Mitell- und Ost-Europa 3, Nordic Academy of Informatization e.V.i.G. mit Sitz in Stralsund, 4. Quartal 2001, 107-114.
18. Ustinovičius, L. 2001. Determining integrated weights of attributes, Statyba [Civil Engineering] 7(4): 321-326.
19. Saaty, T. L. 1994. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the AHP. RWS Publication, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
20. Saaty, T. L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. M. Graw-Hill, New York.
21. Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A. 1996. Postatu̧ sistemotechninis i̧jvertinimas. Vilnius: Technika. 280 p.
22. Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A.; Banaitis, A.; Kvederytė, N. 2004. Housing credit access model: The case for Lithuania, European Journal of Operational Research 155: 335-352.