Minimal access versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of spondylolisthesis

Neurosurgery

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 296-304

  Ghahreman, Ali ^a   Ferch, Richard D ^a   Rao, Prashanth J ^a   Bogduk, Nikolai ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Minimal access; Posterior lumbar interbody fusion; Radicular pain; Spondylolisthesis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BACKACHE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEG PAIN; MINIMAL ACCESS POSTERIOR INTERBODY FUSION; MOBILIZATION; OPEN POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADICULAR PAIN; SPINE SURGERY; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; INTERNAL FIXATORS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADICULOPATHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SPINAL FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 75749093006     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000363600.24074.D0     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Cloward RB. The treatment of ruptured lumbar intervertebral discs by vertebral body fusion. I. Indications, operative technique, after care. J Neurosurg. 1953;10(2):154-168.
2. Rousseau MA, Lazennec JY, Bass EC, Saillant G. Predictors of outcome after posterior decompression and fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 2005;14(1):55-60.
3. Sears W. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lytic spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers. Spine J. 2005;5(2):161-169. (Pubitemid 40331436)
4. Sears W. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers. Spine J. 2005;5(2):170-179. (Pubitemid 40331437)
5. Gejo R, Matsui H, Kawaguchi Y, Ishihara H, Tsuji H. Spinal changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(10):1023-1028.
6. Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(15 Suppl):26-35.
7. Park Y, Ha JW. Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(5):537-543.
8. Taillard W. Spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents [in French]. Acta Orthop Scand. 1954;24(2):115-144.
9. Kwon BK, Hilibrand AS, Malloy K, et al. A critical analysis of the literature regarding surgical approach and outcome for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18(Suppl):S30-S40.
10. Madan S, Boeree NR. Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spondylotic spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(14):1536-1542.
11. Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim WJ, Lee JH, Cho KJ, Kim HG. Adding posterior lumbar interbody fusion to pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression in spondylotic spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22(2):210-220.
12. Wang YP, Fei Q, Qiu GX, et al. Outcome of posterolateral fusion versus circumferential fusion with cage for lumbar stenosis and low degree lumbar spondylolisthesis. Chin Med Sci J. 2006;21(1):41-47.
13. Foley KT, Lefkowitz MA. Advances in minimally invasive spine surgery. Clin Neurosurg. 2002;49:499-517.
14. Ekman P, Möller H, Tullberg T, Neumann P, Hedlund R. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(20):2178-2183.
15. La Rosa G, Conti A, Cocciola F, et al. Pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis: does posterior lumbar interbody fusion improve outcome over posterolateral fusion? J Neurosurg. 2003;99(2 Suppl):143-150.
16. Zhao J, Hou T, Wang X, Ma S. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using one diagonal fusion cage with transpedicular screw/rod fixation. Eur Spine J. 2003;12(2):173-177.
17. Akamaru T, Kawahara N, Yoon ST, et al. Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(14):1560-1566.
18. Ani N, Keppler L, Biscup RS, Steffee AD. Reduction of high-grade slips (grade III-V) with VSP instrumentation: report of a series of 41 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991;16(6 Suppl):S302-S310.
19. Boxall D, Bradford DS, Winter RB, Moe JH. Management of severe spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61(4):479-495.
20. Dewald RL, Faut MM, Taddonio RF, Neuwirth MG. Severe lumbosacral spondylolisthesis in adolescents and children: reduction and staged circumferential fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63(4):619-626.
21. Hioki A, Miyamoto K, Kodama H, et al. Two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative disc disease: improved clinical outcome with restoration of lumbar lordosis. Spine J. 2005;5(6):600-607.
22. Hu SS, Bradford DS, Transfeldt EE, Cohen M. Reduction of high-grade spondylolisthesis using Edwards instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21(3):367-371.
23. Kawakami M, Tamaki T, Ando M, Yamada H, Hashizume H, Yoshida M. Lumbar sagittal balance influences the clinical outcome after spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(1):59-64.
24. Oda I, Cunningham BW, Buckley RA, et al. Does spinal kyphotic deformity influence the biomechanical characteristics of adjacent motion segments? An in vivo animal model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(20):2139-2146.
25. Meyerding HW. Spondylolisthesis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1932;54:371-378.
26. Ruf M, Koch H, Melcher RP, Harms J. Anatomic reduction and monosegmental fusion in high-grade developmental spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(3):269-274. (Pubitemid 43214766)