Dynamic rupture models for the Southern San Andreas fault

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 100, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 131-150

  Ely, Geoffrey P ^a   Day, Steven M ^b   Minster, Jean Bernard ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAMPBELL; COHESIVE ZONES; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DIRECTIVITY EFFECT; DYNAMIC RUPTURE MODELS; EMPIRICAL MODEL; FINITE DIFFERENCE; GROUND MOTIONS; GROUND SURFACES; GROUND-MOTION; LOW PROBABILITY; OPERATOR NUMERICAL METHOD; PSEUDOSPECTRAL; SAN ANDREAS FAULT; SLIP RATES; SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA; SUPERSHEAR RUPTURE; TRACTION MODELS; VELOCITY MODEL; WAVE SOLUTION;

DIELECTRIC PROPERTIES; EARTHQUAKES; NUMERICAL METHODS; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY; TECTONICS; TRACTION (FRICTION); WAVEGUIDES;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

ASPERITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; GROUND MOTION; HETEROGENEITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; PROBABILITY; SAN ANDREAS FAULT; SEISMIC VELOCITY; SLIP RATE;

CALIFORNIA; CHINO BASIN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 75649144421     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/0120090187     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Andrews, D. J. (1976). Rupture propagation with finite stress in antiplane strain, J. Geophys. Res. 81, no. B20, 3575-3582.
2. Andrews, D. J. (2004). Rupture models with dynamically determined break-down displacement, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94, no. 3, 769-775, doi 10.1785/0120030142.
3. Beeler, N. M., and T. E. Tullis (1996). Self-healing slip pulses in dynamic rupture models due to velocity-dependent strength, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 86, no. 4, 1130-1148.
4. Beeler, N. M., T. E. Tullis, and D. Goldsby (2008). Constitutive relationships and physical basis of fault strength due to flash-heating, J. Geophys. Res. 113, no. B01401, doi 10.1029/2007JB004988.
5. Berenger, J.-P. (1994). A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves, J. Comput. Phys. 114, no. 2, 185-200, doi 10.1006/jcph.1994.1159.
6. Berenger, J.-P. (1996). Three-dimensional perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves, J. Comput. Phys. 127, no. 2, 363-379, doi 10.1006/jcph.1996.0181.
7. Beroza, G. C., and T. Mikumo (1996). Short slip duration in dynamic rupture in the presence of heterogeneous fault properties, J. Geophys. Res. 101, no. B10, 22,449-22,460, doi 10.1029/96JB02291.
8. Campbell, K. W., and Y. Bozorgnia (2008). NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s, Earthquake Spectra 24, no. 1, 139-171, doi 10.1193/1.2857546.
9. Das, S., and B. V. Kostrov (1983). Breaking of a single asperity: Rupture process and seismic radiation, J. Geophys. Res. 88, no. B5, 4277-4288.
10. Day, S. M. (1982). Three-dimensional finite difference simulation of fault dynamics: Rectangular faults with fixed rupture velocity, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 72, no. 3, 705-727.
11. Day, S. M. (1998). Efficient simulation of constant Q using coarse-grained memory variables, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 88, no. 4, 1051-1062.
12. Day, S. M., and C. R. Bradley (2001). Memory-efficient simulation of anelastic wave propagation, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 91, no. 3, 520-531, doi 10.1785/0120000103.
13. Day, S. M., L. A. Dalguer, N. Lapusta, and Y. Liu (2005). Comparison of finite difference and boundary integral solutions to three-dimensional spontaneous rupture, J. Geophys. Res. 110, B12307, doi 10.1029/2005JB003813.
14. Day, S. M., G. Yu, and D. J. Wald (1998). Dynamic stress changes during earthquake rupture, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 88, no. 2, 512-522.
15. Dunham, E. M., P. Favreau, and J. M. Carlson (2003). A supershear transition mechanism for cracks, Science 299, no. 5612, 1557-1559, doi 10.1126/science.1080650.
16. Ely, G. P., S. M. Day, and J.-B. H. Minster (2008). A support-operator method for viscoelastic wave modeling in 3D heterogeneous media, Geophys. J. Int. 172, no. 1, 331-344, doi 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03633.x.
17. Ely, G. P., S. M. Day, and J.-B. H. Minster (2009). A support-operator method for 3D rupture dynamics, Geophys. J. Int. 177, no. 3, 1140-1150, doi 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04117.x.
18. Eshelby, J. D. (1949). Uniformly moving dislocations, Proc. Phys. Soc. A 62, no. 5, 307-314, doi 10.1088/0370-1298/62/5/307.
19. Frankel, A. (1993). Three-dimensional simulations of ground motions in the San Bernardino Valley, California, for hypothetical earthquakes on the San Andreas fault, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 83, no. 4, 1020-1041.
20. Frankel, A. D., M. D. Petersen, C. S. Mueller, K. M. Haller, R. L. Wheeler, E. V. Leyendecker, R. L. Wesson, S. C. Harmsen, C. H. Cramer, D. M. Perkins, and K. S. Rukstales (2002). Documentation for the 2002 update of the national seismic hazard maps, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open File Rept. 2002-420, Denver, Colorado.
21. Graves, R. W. (1998). Three-dimensional finite-difference modeling of the San Andreas fault: Source parameterization and ground-motion levels, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 88, no. 4, 881-897.
22. Hanks, T. C., and W. H. Bakun (2002). A bilinear source-scaling model for M-logA observations of continental earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92, no. 5, 1841-1846, doi 10.1785/0120010148.
23. Hanks, T. C., and W. H. Bakun (2008). M-logA observations for recent large earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 98, no. 1, 490-494, doi 10.1785/0120070174.
24. Hughes, T. J. R. (2000). The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis, Dover Publishers, New York.
25. Kohler, M. D., H. Magistrale, and R. W. Clayton (2003). Mantle heterogeneities and the SCEC reference three-dimensional seismic velocity model version 3, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, no. 2, 757-774, doi 10.1785/0120020017.
26. Ma, S., R. J. Archuleta, and M. T. Page (2007). Effects of large-scale surface topography on ground motions, as demonstrated by a study of the San Gabriel mountains, Los Angeles, California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 97, no. 6, 2066-2079, doi 10.1785/0120070040.
27. Magistrale, H. (2005). Version 4 of the CVM, 2005 SCEC Annual Meeting, Palm Springs, California.
28. Magistrale, H., S. M. Day, R. W. Clayton, and R. W. Graves (2000). The SCEC southern California reference three-dimensional seismic velocity model version 2, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 90, no. 6B, S65-76, doi 10.1785/0120000510.
29. Marcinkovich, C., and K. Olsen (2003). On the implementation of perfectly matched layers in a three-dimensional fourth-order velocity-stress finite difference scheme, J. Geophys. Res. 108, no. B5, doi 10.1029/2002JB002235.
30. Nielsen, S. B., and J. M. Carlson (2000). Rupture pulse characterization: Self-healing, self-similar, expanding solutions in a continuum model of fault dynamics, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 90, no. 6, 1480-1497, doi 10.1785/0120000021.
31. Oglesby, D. D., D. S. Dreger, R. A. Harris, N. Ratchkovski, and R. Hansen (2004). Inverse kinematic and forward dynamic models of the 2002 Denali fault earthquake, Alaska, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94, no. 6B, S214-233, doi 10.1785/0120040620.
32. Olsen, K. B., S. M. Day, J.-B. Minster, Y. Cui, A. Chourasia, M. Faerman, R. Moore, P. Maechling, and T. Jordan (2006). Strong shaking in Los Angeles expected from southern San Andreas earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L07305, doi 10.1029/2005GL025472.
33. Olsen, K. B., S. M. Day, J.-B. Minster, Y. Cui, A. Chourasia, D. Okaya, P. Maechling, and T. Jordan (2008). TeraShake2: Spontaneous rupture simulations of Mw 7:7 earthquakes on the southern San Andreas fault, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 98, no. 3, 1162-1185, doi 10.1785/0120070148.
34. Palmer, A. C., and J. R. Rice (1973). The growth of slip surfaces in the progressive failure of over-consolidated clay, Proc. R. Soc. A 332, no. 1591, 527-548, doi 10.1098/rspa.1973.0040.
35. Peyrat, S., K. B. Olsen, and R. Madariaga (2001). Dynamic modeling of the 1992 Landers earthquake, J. Geophys. Res. 106, no. B11, 26,467-26,482, doi 10.1029/2001JB000205.
36. Rice, J. R. (1980). The mechanics of earthquake rupture, in Physics of the Earth's Interior, Proceedings of the Enrico Fermi International School of Physics, vol. Course 78, A. M. Dziewonski and E. Boschi (Editors), 555-649, North-Holland.
37. Rice, J. R. (2006). Heating and weakening of faults during earthquake slip, J. Geophys. Res. 111, B05311, doi 10.1029/2005JB004006.
38. Seeber, L., and J. G. Armbruster (1995). The San Andreas fault system through the Transverse Ranges as illuminated by earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res. 100, no. B5, 8285-8310, doi 10.1029/94JB02939.
39. Somerville, P. G. (2006). Review of magnitude-area scaling of crustal earthquakes, Report to the Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities, URS Corp., Pasadena, California.
40. Tsutsumi, A., and T. Shimamoto (1997). High-velocity frictional properties of gabbro, Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, no. 6, 699-702.
41. U.S. Department of Commerce (2006). 2-Minute Gridded Global Relief Data (ETOPO2v2), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Geophysical Data Center.
42. Weldon, R., K. Scharer, T. Fumal, and G. Biasi (2004). Wrightwood and the earthquake cycle: What a long recurrence record tells us about how faults work, GSA Today 14, no. 9, 4-10.
43. Wells, D. L., and K. J. Coppersmith (1994). New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84, no. 4, 974-1002.
44. Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (1995). Seismic hazards in southern California: Probable earthquakes, 1994 to 2024, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 85, no. 2, 379-439.
45. Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (2003). Earthquake probabilities in the San Francisco bay region: 2002-2031, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open File Rept. 03-214.
46. Zheng, G., and J. R. Rice (1998). Conditions under which velocity-weakening friction allows a self-healing versus a cracklike mode of rupture, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 88, no. 6, 1466-1483.