Numerical comparative study on the hemodynamic performance of a new helical graft with noncircular cross section and swirlGraft

Artificial Organs

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 22-27

  Sun, Anqiang ^a   Fan, Yubo ^a   Deng, Xiaoyan ^a  

^a BEIHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Acute thrombus formation; Arterial prosthesis; Helical graft; Swirling flow; Wall shear stress

Indexed keywords

BLOOD VESSELS; DROPS; FLOW FIELDS; GRAFTING (CHEMICAL); PRESSURE DROP; SHEAR STRESS; STRESS CONCENTRATION; SWIRLING FLOW;

ACUTE THROMBUS FORMATION; ARTERIAL PROSTHESIS; COMPARATIVES STUDIES; HELICAL GRAFT; HELICITIES; NONCIRCULAR CROSS SECTION; SHEAR STRESS DISTRIBUTION; THROMBUS FORMATION; WALL SHEAR STRESS; WALL-SHEAR STRESS;

SHEAR FLOW;

ARTERY GRAFT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; GEOMETRY; HEMODYNAMICS; LEUKOCYTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; SHEAR STRESS; THROMBOCYTE ADHESION; THROMBOGENESIS; THROMBUS;

EID: 75649111544     PISSN: 0160564X     EISSN: 15251594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2009.00797.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Kent KC, Whittemore AD, Mannick JA. Short-term and midterm results of an all-autogenous tissue policy for infrainguinal reconstruction. J Vasc Surg 1989 9 : 107 120.
2. Brossollet LJ. Mechanical issues in vascular grafting: a review. Int J Artif Organs 1992 15 : 579 584.
3. Salacinski HJ, Goldner S, Giudiceandrea A. The mechanical behavior of vascular grafts: a review. J Biomater Appl 2001 15 : 241 278.
4. Zidi M, Cheref M. Mechanical analysis of a prototype of small diameter vascular prosthesis: numerical simulations. Comput Biol Med 2003 33 : 65 75.
5. Rhee K, Tarbell JM. A study of the wall shear rate distribution near the end-to-end anastomosis of a rigid graft and a compliant artery. J Biomech 1994 27 : 329 338.
6. Qiao A, Matsuzawa T. Hemodynamic simulation in a novel design for femoral bypass grafts. Biorheology 2007 44 : 103 124.
7. Sauvage LR, Walker MW, Berger K. Current arterial prostheses: experimental evaluation by implantation in the carotid and circumflex coronary arteries of the dog. Arch Surg 1979 114 : 687 691.
8. Caro CG, Cheshire NJ, Watkins N. Preliminary comparative study of small amplitude helical and conventional ePTFE arteriovenous shunts in pigs. J R Soc Interface 2005 2 : 261 266.
9. Rotmans JL, Velema E, Verhagen HJM, et al. Rapid arteriovenous graft failure due to intimal hyperplasia: a porcine, bilateral, carotid arteriovenous graft model. J Surg Res 2003 113 : 161 171.
10. Karino T. Microscopic structure of disturbed flows in the arterial and venous systems, and its implication in the localization of vascular diseases. Int Angiol 1986 5 : 297 313.
11. Glagov S, Zarins C, Giddens DP. Hemodynamics and atherosclerosis. Insights and perspectives gained from studies of human arteries. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1988 112 : 1018 1031.
12. Buchanan JR, Kleinstreurer C, Hyun S. Hemodynamics simulation and identification of susceptible sites of atherosclerotic lesion formation in a model abdominal aorta. J Biomech 2003 36 : 1185 1196.
13. Kilner PJ, Yang GZ, Mohiaddin RH, Firmin DN, Longmore DB. Helical and retrograde secondary flow patterns in the aortic arch studied by three-directional magnetic resonance velocity mapping. Circulation 1993 88 : 2235 2247.
14. Stonebridge PA, Brophy CM. Spiral laminar flow in arteries? Lancet 1991 338 : 1360 1361.
15. Stonebridge PA, Hoskins PR, Allan PL. Spiral laminar flow in vivo. Clin Sci 1996 91 : 17 21.
16. Uchida Y, Tomaru T, Nakamura F. Percutaneous coronary angioscopy in patients with ischemic heart disease. Am Heart J 1987 114 : 1216 1222.
17. Morbiducci U, Ponzini R, Grigioni M, Redaelli A. Helical flow as fluid dynamic signature for atherogenesis risk in aortocoronary bypass. A numeric study. J Biomech 2007 40 : 519 534.
18. Bassiouny HS, White S, Glagov S, Choi E, Giddens DP, Zarins CK. Anastomotic intimal hyperplasia: mechanical injury or flow induced. J Vasc Surg 1992 15 : 708 717.
19. Ojha M. Spatial and temporal variations of wall shear stress within an end-to-side arterial anastomosis model. J Biomech 1993 26 : 1377 1388.
20. Staalsen NH, Ulrich M, Winther J, Pederson EM, How T, Nygaard H. The anastomotic angle does change the flow fields at vascular end-to-side anastomoses in vivo. J Vasc Surg 1995 21 : 460 471.