Complexity analysis based on image-processing method and pixelized recognition of chinese characters using simulated prosthetic vision

Artificial Organs

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 28-36

  Yang, Kun ^a   Zhou, Chuanqing ^a   Ren, Qiushi ^a   Fan, Jin ^a   Zhang, Leilei ^a   Chai, Xinyu ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Complexity; Pixelized Chinese characters; Recognition; Simulated prosthetic vision

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; PROCESSING; PROSTHETICS;

BLACK PIXELS; CHINESE CHARACTERS; COMPLEXITY; IMAGE PROCESSING - METHODS; PIXEL ARRAYS; PIXELIZED CHINESE CHARACTER; PROSTHETIC VISION; RECOGNITION; RECOGNITION ACCURACY; SIMULATED PROSTHETIC VISION;

PIXELS;

ACCURACY; ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; SIMULATED PROSTHETIC VISION; STATISTICS; VISUAL PROSTHESIS;

EID: 75649094125     PISSN: 0160564X     EISSN: 15251594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2009.00778.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ross RD. Is perception of light useful to the blind patient? Arch Ophthalmol 1998 116 : 236 238.
2. Wyatt J, Rizzo JF. Ocular implants for the blind. IEEE Spectrum 1996 112 : 47 53.
3. Veraart C, Raftopoulos C, Mortimer JT, et al. Visual sensations produced by optic nerve stimulation using an implanted self-sizing spiral cuff electrode. Brain Res 1998 813 : 181 186.
4. Hambrecht FT. Visual prostheses based on direct interfaces with the visual system. Baillieres Clin Neurol 1995 4 : 147 165.
5. Zrenner E. Will retinal implants restore vision? Science 2002 295 : 1022 1025.
6. Margalit E, Maia M, Weiland JD, et al. Retinal prosthesis for the blind. Surv Ophthalmol 2002 47 : 335 356.
7. Thompson RW, Barnett GD, Humayun MS, Dagnelie G. Facial recognition using simulated prosthetic vision. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 2003 44 : 5035 5042.
8. Dagnelie G, Barnett D, Humayun MS, Thompson RW Jr. Paragraph text reading using a pixelized prosthetic vision simulator: parameter dependence and task learning in free-viewing conditions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006 47 : 1241 1250.
9. Hayes JS, Yin VT, Piyathaisere D, Weiland JD, Humayun MS, Dagnelie G. Visually guided performance of simple tasks using simulated prosthetic vision. Artif Organs 2003 27 : 1016 1028.
10. Latham K, Whitaker D. A comparison of word recognition and reading performance in foveal and peripheral vision. Vision Res 1996 36 : 2665 2674.
11. Bagnoud M, Sommerhalder J, Pelizzone M, Safran AB. Necessary visual information for restoring reading with a retinal implant in a blind patients with massive retinal degeneration of photoreceptors. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2001 218 : 360 362.
12. Legge GE, Pelli DG, Rubin GS, Schleske MM. Psychophysics of reading. I. Normal vision. Vision Res 1985 25 : 239 252.
13. Legge GE, Ross J, Luebker A, LaMay J. Psychophysics of reading. VIII: the Minnesota low-vision reading test. Optom Vis Sci 1989 66 : 843 853.
14. Cha K, Horch KW, Normann RA, Boman DK. Reading speed with a pixelized vision system. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 1992 A9 : 673 677.
15. Sommerhalder J, Oueghlani E, Bagnoud M, Leonards U, Safran AB, Pelizzone M. Simulation of artificial vision: I. Eccentric reading of isolated words, and perceptual learning. Vision Res 2003 43 : 269 283.
16. Sommerhalder J, Rappaz B, Haller RD, Fonrnos AP, Safran AB, Pelizzone M. Simulation of artificial vision: II. Eccentric reading of full-page text and the learning of this task. Vision Res 2004 44 : 1693 1706.
17. Fornos AP, Sommerhalder J, Rappaz B, Safran AB, Pelizzone M. Simulation of artificial vision, III: do the spatial or temporal characteristics of stimulus pixelization really matter? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005 46 : 3906 3912.
18. Fu L, Cai S, Zhang H, Hu G, Zhang X. Psychophysics of reading with a limited number of pixels: towards the rehabilitation of reading ability with visual prosthesis. Vision Res 2006 46 : 1292 1301.
19. Chai X, Yu W, Wang J, Zhao Y, Cai C, Ren Q. Recognition of pixelized CC using simulated prosthetic vision. Artif Organs 2007 31 : 175 182.
20. Yeh J-S, Lu I-M. Factors affecting recognition thresholds of CC. Chin J Psychol 1972 14 : 113 117.
21. Yeh SL, Li JL, Chen KM. Classification of the shapes of CC: verification by different pre-designated categories and varied sample sizes. Chin J Psychol 1999 41 : 65 85.
22. Yeh SL. Structure detection of CC: visual search slope as an index of similarity between different-structured characters. Chin J Psychol 2000 42 : 191 216.
23. Yeh SL, Li JL. Sublexical processing in visual recognition of CC: evidence from repetition blindness for subcharacter components. Brain Lang 2004 88 : 47 53.
24. Yang X, Zhou C. Analysis of the complexity of remote sensing image and its role on image classification. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2000. Proceedings of IGARSS 2000. 2000 5 : 2179 2181.
25. Guo Z, Cai Z. Two-dimensional pattern complexity. J Fudan University 2005 44 : P332 7.
26. 0 complexity. Appl Math Mech 2005 26 : 1188 1196.
27. Cai D, Chi C-F, You M. The legibility threshold of CC in three type styles. Int J Ind Ergon 2001 27 : 9 17.