The effectiveness of surgical correction of uterine prolapse: cervical amputation with uterosacral ligament plication (modified Manchester) versus vaginal hysterectomy with high uterosacral ligament plication.

International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction

Volumn 20, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1313-1319

  de Boer, Tiny A ^a   Milani, Alfredo L ^a   Kluivers, Kirsten B ^a   Withagen, Mariella I J ^a   Vierhout, Mark E ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; LIGAMENT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVIX; UTERUS PROLAPSE; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CERVIX UTERI; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY, VAGINAL; LIGAMENTS; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE PROLAPSE;

EID: 75549089937     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14333023     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-009-0945-3     Document Type: Article

References (0)