Profitability decided by patent quality? An empirical study of the U.S. semiconductor industry

Scientometrics

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 175-183

  Cheng, Yin Hui ^a   Kuan, Fu Yung ^b   Chuang, Shih Chieh ^c   Ken, Yun ^d  

^a NATIONAL TAICHUNG UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL KAOHSIUNG UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL CHUNG CHENG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d NATIONAL YUNLIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Patent; Patent citation; Patent quality; Profitability

Indexed keywords

EID: 75549088895     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0080-4     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Breitzman, A. F., & Narin, F. (2001). Method and apparatus for choosing a stock portfolio, based on patent indicators. US Patent 61758214.
2. Deng, Z., Lev, B., & Narin, F. (1999). Science and technology as predictors of stock performance. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(3), 20-32.
3. Ernst, H. (1998). Patent portfolios for strategic R& D planning. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15, 279-308.
4. Hagedoorn, J., & Cloodt, M. (2003). Measuring innovative performance: Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy, 32, 1365-1379.
5. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251-1271.
6. Markman, G., Espina, M., & Phan, P. (2004). Patents as surrogates for inimitable and non-substitutable resources. Journal of Management, 30(4), 529-544.
7. Ramanathan, K. (1999). Determinants of value in pharmaceutical innovation: A property rights approach. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Illinois.
8. Thomas, P., CHI Research Inc., McMillan, G. S., & Abington, P. (2001). Using science and technology indicators to manage R& D as a business. Engineering Management Journal, 13(3), 9-14.