Pitch perception

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 71, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1701-1715

  Yost, William A ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEARING; HUMAN; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REVIEW; SOUND DETECTION; TIME PERCEPTION;

HUMANS; PITCH PERCEPTION; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 75549084513     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.8.1701     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (1978). ANSI, S3.20-R1978-American National Standard on Bioacoustical Terminology. Acoustical Society of America.
2. BENDOR, D. A., & WANG, X. (2005). The neuronal representation of pitch in primate auditory cortex. Nature, 436, 1161-1165.
3. BERNSTEIN, J. G., & OXENHAM, A. J. (2003). Pitch discrimination of diotic and dichotic tone complexes: Harmonic resolvability or harmonic number? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 3323-3334.
4. BERNSTEIN, J. G., & OXENHAM, A. J. (2005). An autocorrelation model with place dependence to account for the effect of harmonic number on fundamental frequency discrimination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 3816-3831.
5. BERNSTEIN, J. G., & OXENHAM, A. J. (2008). Harmonic segregation through mistiming can improve fundamental frequency discrimination. Journal ofthe Acoustical Society of'America, 124, 1653-1667.
6. BURNS, E. M., & VIEMEISTER, N. F. (1981). Played-again SAM: Further observations on the pitch of amplitude-modulated noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70, 1655-1660.
7. CARIANI, P. A., SC DELGUTTE, B. (1996). Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones: I. Pitch and pitch salience. Journal of Neurophysiology, 76, 1698-1716.
8. CARLYON, R. P. (1998). Comments on "A unitary model of pitch perception" [J. Acoust Soc. Am. 102, 1811-1820 (1997)].
9. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 1118-1121.
10. COHEN, M. A., GROSSBERG, S., & WYSE, L. L. (1995). A spectral network model of pitch perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 862-879.
11. DE BOER, E. (1956). On the "residue" in hearing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
12. DE BOER, E. (1961). A note on phase distortion and hearing. Acoustica, 11, 182-184.
13. DE BOER, E. (1976). On the "residue" and auditory pitch perception. In W. D. Keidel & W. D. Neff (Eds.), Handbook of sensory physiology (pp. 479-583). New York: Springer.
14. DE CHEVEIGNE, A. (1998). Cancellation model of pitch perception Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 1261-1271.
15. GOLDSTEIN, J. L. (1973). An optimum processor theory for the central formation of the pitch of complex tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54, 1496-1516.
16. GRIFFITHS, T. D., BUECHEL, C., FRACKOWMK, R. S. J., & PATTERSON, R. D. (1998). Analysis of temporal structure in sound by the brain. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 422-427.
17. GUTSCHALK, A., PATTERSON, R. D., SCHERG, M., UPPENKAMP, S., & RUPP, A. (2004). Temporal dynamics of pitch in human auditory cortex. NeuroImage, 22, 755-766.
18. HALL, D., & PLACK, C. (2007). Searching for a pitch centre in human auditory cortex. In B. Kollmeier et al. (Eds.), Hearing: From sensory processing to perception (pp. 83-94). Berlin: Springer.
19. IRINO, T., & PATTERSON, R. D. (1996). Temporal asymmetry in the auditory system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 2316-2331.
20. IVES, D. T., & PATTERSON, R. D. (2008). Pitch strength decreases as FO and harmonic resolution increase in complex tines pomposed exclusively of high harmonics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,123, 2670-2679.
21. KAERNBACH, C., & DEMANY, L. (1998). Psychophysical evidence against the autocorrelation theory of auditory temporal processing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 2298-2306.
22. LANGNER, G., & SCHREINER, C. E. (1988). Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the cat: I. Neuronal mechanisms. Journal of Neurophysiology, 60, 1799-1822.
23. LANGNER, G., SCHREINER, C. E., & BIEBEL, U. W. (1998). Functional implications of frequency and periodicity pitch in the auditory system. In A. R. Palmer, A. Rees, A. Q. Summersfield, & R. Meddis (Eds.), Psychophysical and physiological advances in hearing (pp. 277-285). London: Whurr.
24. LICKUDER, J. C. R. (1951). A duplex theory of pitch perception. Experientia, 7, 128-133.
25. LICKUDER, J. C. R. (1954). "Periodicity" pitch and "place" pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 945-950.
26. LIN, J.-Y., & HARTMANN, W. M. (1998). The pitch of a mistuned harmonic: Evidence for a template model. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 2608-2613.
27. MEDDIS, R. (1986). Simulation of mechanical to neural transduction in the auditory receptor. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 79, 702-711.
28. MEDDIS, R., & HEWITT, M. J. (1991). Virtual pitch and phase sensitivity of a computer model of the auditory periphery. I: Pitch identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 2866-2882.
29. MEDDIS, R., & O'MARD, L. (1997). A unitary model of pitch perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 1811-1820.
30. MOORE, B. C. J. (1993). Frequency analysis and pitch perception. In W. A. Yost, A. N. Popper, & R. R. Fay (Eds.), Human psychophysics (pp. 56-116). New York: Springer.
31. MOORE, B. C. J., GLASBERG, B. J., & PETERS, R. W. (1985). Relative dominance of individual partíais in detennining the pitch of complex tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77, 1853-1860.
32. MOORE, B. C. J., PETERS, R. W., & GLASBERG, B. R. (1986). Thresholds for hearing mistuned partíais as separate tones in harmonic complexes. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80, 479-483.
33. PATTERSON, R. D. (1969). Noise masking of a change in residue pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 45, 1520-1524.
34. PATTERSON, R. D. (1973). The effects of relative phase and the number of components on residue pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 53, 1565-1572.
35. PATTERSON, R. D., ALLERHAND, M. H., & GIGUERE, C. (1995). Timedomain modeling of peripheral auditory processing: A modular architecture and a software platform. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 1890-1894.
36. PATTERSON, R. D., & IRINO, T. (1998). Auditory temporal asymmetry and autocorrelation. In A. Palmer, A. Rees, Q. Summersfield, & R. Meddis (Eds.), Psychological and physiological advances in hearing (pp. 554-562). London: Whurr.
37. PATTERSON, R. D., & JOHNSRUDE, I. S. (2008). Functional imaging of the auditory processing applied to speech sounds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 1012-1035.
38. PATTERSON, R. D., & WIGHTMAN, F. L. (1976). Residue pitch as a function of component spacing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, 1450-1459.
39. PATTERSON, R. D., YOST, W. A., HANDEL, S., & DATTA, A. J. (2000). The perceptual tone/noise ratio of merged iterated rippled noises. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 1578-1588.
40. PLACK, C. J., OXENHAM, A. A., FAY, R. R., & POPPER, A. N. (EDS.) (2005). Pitch: Neural coding and perception. New York: Springer.
41. PLOMP, R. (1967). Pitch of complex tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 41, 1526-1533.
42. PLOMP, R. (1976). Aspects of tone sensation: A psychophysical study. London: Academic Press.
43. PRESSNTTZER, D., De CHEVEIGNÉ, A., & WINTER, I. M. (2004). Physiological correlates ofthe perceptual pitch shift for sounds with similar autocorrelation. Acoustics Research Letters Online, 5, 1-6.
44. PRESSNTTZER, D., & PATTERSON, R. D. (2001). Distortion products and the perceived pitch of harmonic complex tones. In D. Breebaart, A. Houtsma, A. Kohlrausch, V. Prijs, & R. Schoonhovem (Eds.), Physiological and psychophysical bases of auditory function (pp. 97-104). Maastricht: Shaker.
45. RrrsMA, R. J. (1962). Existence region of the tonal residue. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 34, 1224-1229.
46. SAYLES, M., & WINTER, I. M. (2008). Ambiguous pitch and the temporal representation of inharmonic iterated rippled noise in the ventral cochlear nucleus. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 11925-11938.
47. SCHOUTEN, J. F. (1938). The perception of subjective tones. Proceedings of the Konlnklljke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, 41, 1086-1093.
48. SCHOUTEN, J. F. (1940). The residue, a new component in subjective sound analysis. Proceedings of the Koninkijfke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, 43, 356-365.
49. SCHREINER, C. E., & URBAS, J. V. (1986). Representation of amplitude modulation in the auditory cortex ofthe cat I. The anterior auditory field (AAF). Hearing Research, 21, 227-241.
50. SHAMMA, S., & KLEIN, D. (2000). The case of the missing pitch templates: How harmonic templates emerge in the early auditory system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2631-2644.
51. SHOFNER, W. P. (1999). Responses of cochlear nucleus units in the chinchilla to iterated rippled noises: Analysis of neural autocorrelograms. Journal of Neurophysiology, 81, 2662-2674.
52. SLANEY, M., & LYON, R. F. (1993). On the importance of time: A temporal representation of sound. In M. Cooke, S. Beet & M. Crawford (Eds.), Visual representations of speech signals (pp. 95-116). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
53. STEVENS, S. S., VOLKMANN, J., & NEWMAN, B. N. (1937). A scale for the measurement of the psychological magnitude pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 8, 185-190.
54. TERHARDT, E. (1974). Pitch, consonance, and harmony. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55, 1061-1069.
55. WIEGREBE, L., & WINTER, I. M. (2001). Psychophysics and physiology of regular interval noise: Critical experiments for current pitch models and evidence for a lst-order temporal pitch code. In D. Breebaart, A. Houtsma, A. Kohlrausch, V Prijs, & R. Schoonhoven (Eds.), Physiological and psychophysical bases of auditory function (pp. 121-128). Maastricht Shaker.
56. WIGHTMAN, F. L. (1973). The pattern-transformation model of pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54, 407-416.
57. YOST, W. A. (2007). Pitch perception. In P. Dallos, D. Oretel & R. Hoy (Eds.), The senses: A comprehensive reference -Audition (Vol. 3, pp. 1023-1057). London: Academic Press.
58. YOST, W. A., MAPES-RIORDAN, D., DYE, R., SHEFT, S., & SHOFNER, W. (2005). Discrimination of first- and second-order regular intervals from random intervals as a function of high-pass filter cutoff frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 59-62.
59. YOST, W. A., PATTERSON, R. D., & SHEFT, S. (1996). A time-domain description for the pitch strength of iterated rippled noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1066-1078.
60. YOST, W. A., PATTERSON, R. D., & SHEFT, S. (1998). The role of the envelope in auditory processing of regular interval stimuli. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 2349-2361.