Time domain OCT versus frequency domain OCT. Measuring differences of macular thickness in healthy subjects;Time-domain-OCT versus Frequency-domain-OCT. Messunterschiede der Makuladicke bei Normalprobanden

Ophthalmologe

Volumn 107, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 36-40

  Chaber, S ^a   Helbig, H ^a   Gamulescu, M A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Central macular thickness; Healthy subjects; Mapping; Spectralis OCT ; Stratus OCT

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETINA MACULA LUTEA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MACULA LUTEA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE;

EID: 75549084052     PISSN: 0941293X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00347-009-1941-1     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bagci AM, Shahidi M, Ansari R et al (2008) Thickness profiles of retinal layers by optical coherence tomography image segmentation. Am J Ophthalmol 146(5): 679-687.
2. Coker JG, Duker JS (1996) Macular disease and optical coherence tomography. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 7(3): 33-38.
3. Fercher AF, Hitzenberger CK, Kamp G, El-Zaiat SY (1995) Measurement of intraocular distances by backscattering spectral interferometry. Optic Communications 117: 43-48.
4. Forooghian F, Cukras C, Meyerle CB et al (2008) Evaluation of time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in the measurement of diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. Epub ahead of print.
5. Hee MR, Puliafito CA, Wong C et al (1995) Optical coherence tomography of macular holes. Ophthalmology 102(5): 748-756.
6. Hee MR, Puliafito CA, Wong C et al (1995) Optical coherence tomography of central serous chorioretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 120(1): 65-74.
7. Hee MR, Baumal CR, Puliafito CA et al (1996) Optical coherence tomography of age-related macular degeneration and choroidal neovascularisation. Ophthalmology 103(8): 1260-1270.
8. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP et al (1991) Optical coherence tomography. Science 254: 1178-1181.
9. Jaffe GJ, Caprioli J (2004) Optical coherence tomography to detect and manage retinal disease and glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 137(1): 156-169.
10. Jeoung JW, Park KH, Kim TW et al (2005) Diagnostic ability of optical coherence tomography with a normative database to detect localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects. Ophthalmology 112(12): 2157-2163.
11. Leitgeb R, Hitzenberger CK, Fercher AF (2003) Performance of fourier domain vs. Time domain optical coherence tomography. Optics Express 11: 889-894.
12. Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN et al (2008) Comparison of macular thickness measurements between time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. Epub ahead of print.
13. Ruggeri M, Wehbe H, Jiao S et al (2007) In vivo three-dimensional high-resolution imaging of rodent retina with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48(4): 1808-1814.
14. Schnurrbusch UEK, Brinkmann CK, Rothenbühler SP et al (o J) Unterschiede der Netzhautdickenmessungen mit 5 verschiedenen OCT Instrumenten bei gesunden Probanden (DOG Abstract 2008).
15. van Velthoven ME, Faber DJ, Verbraak FD et al (2007) Recent developments in optical coherence tomography for imaging the retina. Prog Retin Eye Res 26(1): 57-77.
16. Wojtkowski M, Srinivasan V, Fujimoto JG et al (2005) Three-dimensional retinal imaging with high-speed ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 112(10): 1734-1746.
17. Wolf E (1969) Three-dimensional structure determination of semi-transparent objects from holographic data. Optics Communications 1(4): 153-156.