Positive Surgical Margins With Renal Cell Carcinoma Have a Limited Influence on Long-term Oncological Outcomes of Nephron Sparing Surgery

Urology

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 277-280

  Raz, Orit ^a   Mendlovic, Sonia ^a   Shilo, Yaniv ^a   Leibovici, Dan ^a   Sandbank, Judith ^a   Lindner, Arie ^a   Zisman, Amnon ^a  

^a ASSAF HAROFEH MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER SURVIVAL; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; LONG TERM CARE; MALE; NEPHRON SPARING SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; NEPHRONS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 75549083548     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.110     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Leibovich B.C., Blute M.L., Cheville J.C., et al. Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy. J Urol 171 (2004) 1066-1070
2. Becker F., Siemer S., Humke U., et al. Elective nephron sparing surgery should become standard treatment for small unilateral renal cell carcinoma: long-term survival data of 216 patients. Eur Urol 49 (2006) 308-313
3. Campbell S.C., and Novick A.C. Management of local recurrence following radical nephrectomy or partial nephrectomy. Urol Clin North Am 21 (1994) 593-599
4. Boorjian S.A., Crispen P.L., Lohse C.M., et al. Surgical resection of isolated retroperitoneal lymph node recurrence of renal cell carcinoma following nephrectomy. J Urol 180 (2008) 99-103
5. Sutherland S.E., Resnick M.I., Maclennan G.T., et al. Does the size of the surgical margin in partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma really matter?. J Urol 167 (2002) 61-64
6. Timsit M.O., Bazin J.P., Thiounn N., et al. Prospective study of safety margins in partial nephrectomy: intraoperative assessment and contribution of frozen section analysis. Urology 67 (2006) 923-926
7. Piper N.Y., Bishoff J.T., Magee C., et al. Is a 1-cm margin necessary during nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma?. Urology 58 (2001) 849-852
8. Castilla E.A., Liou L.S., Abrahams N.A., et al. Prognostic importance of resection margin width after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma. Urology 60 (2002) 993-997
9. Li Q.L., Guan H.W., Zhang Q.P., et al. Optimal margin in nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma 4 cm or less. Eur Urol 44 (2003) 448-451
10. Berdjis N., Hakenberg O.W., Zastrow S., et al. Impact of resection margin status after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 97 (2006) 1208-1210
11. Carini M., Minervini A., Masieri L., et al. Simple enucleation for the treatment of PT1a renal cell carcinoma: our 20-year experience. Eur Urol 50 (2006) 1263-1268 discussion:1269-1271
12. Yossepowitch O., Thompson R.H., Leibovich B.C., et al. Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes. J Urol 179 (2008) 2158-2163
13. Kwon E.O., Carver B.S., Snyder M.E., et al. Impact of positive surgical margins in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for renal cortical tumours. BJU Int 99 (2007) 286-289
14. Kubinski D.J., Clark P.E., Assimos D.G., et al. Utility of frozen section analysis of resection margins during partial nephrectomy. Urology 64 (2004) 31-34
15. Duvdevani M., Laufer M., Kastin A., et al. Is frozen section analysis in nephron sparing surgery necessary? A clinicopathological study of 301 cases. J Urol 173 (2005) 385-387