Main peak interleaved sampling (MPIS) strategy: Effect of stimulation rate variations on speech perception in adult cochlear implant recipients using the Digisonic SP cochlear implant

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 130, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 102-107

  Di Lella, Filippo ^a   Bacciu, Andrea ^a   Pasanisi, Enrico ^a   Vincenti, Vincenzo ^a   Guida, Maurizio ^a   Bacciu, Salvatore ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; High rate stimulation; Main peak interleaved sampling strategy; Speech coding strategies

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUTOMATIC SPEECH RECOGNITION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAIN PEAK INTERLEAVED SAMPLING STRATEGY; MALE; NOISE; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROVOCATION TEST; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH RATE; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WORD RECOGNITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEAFNESS; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; PROSTHESIS; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD TEST;

EID: 75449105601     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: 16512553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00016480902896113     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Balkany T, Hodges A, Menapace C, Hazard L, Driscoll C, Gantz B, et al. Nucleus Freedom North American clinical trial. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;/136:/757-62.
2. Holden LK, Skinner MW, Holden TA, Demorest ME. Effects of stimulation rate with the Nucleus 24 ACE speech coding strategy. Ear Hear 2002;/23:/463-76.
3. Plant K, Holden L, Skinner M, Arcaroli J, Whitford L, Law MA, et al. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system. Ear Hear 2007;/ 28:/381-93.
4. Bacciu A, Pasanisi E, Vincenti V, Ormitti F, Di Lella F, Guida M, et al. Cochlear implantation in children with cerebral palsy. A preliminary report. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009;/73:/717-21.
5. Davids T, Valero J, Papsin BC, Harrison RV, Gordon KA. Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses in pediatric cochlear implant users. Part I: Duration effects. Hear Res 2008;/244:/7-14.
6. Davids T, Valero J, Papsin BC, Harrison RV, Gordon KA. Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses of pediatric cochlear implant users. Part II: Rate effects. Hear Res 2008;/244:/15-24.
7. Vandali AE, Whitford LA, Plant KL, Clark GM. Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Ear Hear 2000;/21:/ 608-24.
8. Skinner MW, Holden LK, Whitford LA, Plant KL, Psarros C, Holden TA. Speech recognition with the nucleus 24 SPEAK, ACE, and CIS speech coding strategies in newly implanted adults. Ear Hear 2002;/23:/207-23.
9. Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Cruz RJ. Effects of stimulation rate on speech recognition with cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 2005;/10:/169-84.
10. Fu QJ. Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration. Hear Res 2005;/ 202:/55-62.
11. Weber BP, Lai WK, Dillier N, von Wallenberg EL, Killian MJ, Pesch J, et al. Performance and preference for ACE stimulation rates obtained with nucleus RP 8 and freedom system. Ear Hear 2007;/28(2 Suppl):/46S-48S.
12. Buchner A, Frohne-Buchner C, Battmer RD, Lenarz T. Two years of experience using stimulation rates between 800 and 5000 pps with the Clarion CII implant. Elsevier International Congress Series 2004;/1273:/48-51.
13. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson D, Zerbi M. Temporal representation with cochlear implants. Am J Otol 1997;/18:/ S27-S29.
14. Rubinstein JT, Wilson BS, Finley CC, Abbas PJ. Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation. Hear Res 1999;/127:/ 108-18.
15. Moore BCJ. Coding of sounds in the auditory system and its relevance to signal processing and coding in cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 2003;/24:/243-54.