Methodological challenges in assessment of cognition following mild head injury: response to malojcic et al. 2008

Journal of Neurotrauma

Volumn 26, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 2409-2410

  Millis, Scott R ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE DEFECT; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; HUMAN; LETTER; METHODOLOGY; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; RISK FACTOR; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY;

BRAIN CONCUSSION; COGNITION DISORDERS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DISABILITY EVALUATION; HUMANS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SELECTION BIAS;

EID: 75449104519     PISSN: 08977151     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2008.0530     Document Type: Letter

References (12)

1. Berry, D., and Schipper, L. (2007). Detection of feigned psychiatric symptoms during forensic neuropsychological examinations, in: Assessment of Malingered Neuropsychological Deficits. G. Larrabee (ed), Oxford University Press: New York, pps. 226-263.
2. Boone, K. (ed). (2007). Assessment of Feigned Cognitive Impairment. Guilford Press: New York.
3. Carroll, L.J., Cassidy, J.D., Peloso, P.M., Borg, J., Von Holst, H., Holm, L., Paniak, C., Pepin, M., and the WHO Collaborative Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. (2004). Prognosis for mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Rehabil. Med. (43 Suppl), 84-105. (Pubitemid 38268224)
4. Dikmen, S., and Levin, H.S. (1993). Methodological issues in the study of mild head injury. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 8, 30-37.
5. Dikmen, S., Machamer, J., Winn, R., and Temkin, N. (1995). Neuropsychological outcome at one-year post head injury. Neuropsychology 9, 80-90.
6. Iverson, G.L. (2005). Outcome from mild traumatic brain injury. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 18, 301-317.
7. Iverson, G.L., and Binder, L.M. (2000). Detecting exaggeration and malingering in neuropsychological assessment. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 15, 829-858.
8. Larrabee, G. (ed). (2007). Assessment of Malingered Neuropsychological Deficits. Oxford University Press: New York.
9. Malojcic, B., Mubrin, Z., Coric, B., Susnic, M., and Spilich, G. (2008). Consequences of mild traumatic brain injury on information processing assessed with attention and short-term memory tasks. J. Neurotrauma 25, 30-37.
10. Millis, S.R. (2004). Evaluation of malingered neurocognitive disorders, in: Principles and Practice of Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychology. M. Rizzo and P. Esslinger (eds), WB Saunders: Philadelphia, pp. 1077-1089.
11. Millis, S.R., and Volinsky, C.T. (2001). Assessment of response bias in mild head injury: beyond malingering tests. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 23, 809-828.
12. Slick, D.J., Sherman, E.M., and Iverson, G.L. (1999). Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: proposed standards for clinical practice and research. Clin. Neuropsychol. 13, 545-561.