Compact fluorescent lighting and residential natural gas consumption: Testing for interactive effects

Energy Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 1288-1296

  Brunner, Eric J ^a   Ford, Peter S ^b   McNulty, Mark A ^c   Thayer, Mark A ^d  

^a QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b San Diego Gas & Electric Company   (United States)

^c Mark McNulty and Associates   (United States)

^d SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Energy efficiency; Residential energy consumption

Indexed keywords

COST-EFFECTIVE MEANS; DATA SETS; ENERGY SAVING; FLUORESCENT LIGHTING; HEATING SEASON; INCANDESCENT BULBS; INCANDESCENT LIGHT BULBS; INTERACTIVE EFFECT; NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION; RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION; RESIDENTIAL SECTORS;

ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY UTILIZATION; FLUORESCENCE; INCANDESCENT LAMPS; NATURAL GAS;

ENERGY EFFICIENCY;

DATA SET; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY POLICY; HOUSEHOLD ENERGY; NATURAL GAS; RESIDENTIAL ENERGY;

EID: 75449084393     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Banerjee A., Solomon B.D. Eco-labeling for energy efficiency and sustainability: a meta-evaluation of U.S. programs. Energy Policy 2003, 31:109-123.
2. Cadmus Group, Inc., KEMA, Itron, Inc., Nexus Market Research, and Goett Consulting. 2009. Compact fluorescent lamps market effects: interim report-draft. Prepared for the California Public Utilities Commission, January.
3. California Energy Commission. 2007. Statewide energy efficiency potential estimates and target for California utilities: draft staff report. CEC-200-2007-019-SD, August.
4. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). 2009. Assessment of achievable potential from energy efficiency and demand response programs in the U.S. 2010-2030. EPRI Technical Report, January.
5. Energy Information Administration. 2005. U.S. household electricity report, July. http://www.eia.doe.gov.
6. Ford P. Interactive effects of CFL lighting in residential applications. Engineering Opinion to Sempra Utilities 2008, October.
7. McNulty, M., J. Murdoch, and M. Thayer, The home energy comparison tool. Prepared for San Diego Gas and Electric Company, Final Report, June 2006.
8. Metcalf G.E., Hassett K.A. Measuring the energy savings from home improvement investments: evidence from monthly billing data. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1999, 81(3):516-528.
9. Sanchez M.C., Brown R.E., Webber C., Homan G.K. Savings estimates for the United States Environmental Protection Agency's ENERGY STAR Voluntary Labeling Program. Energy Policy 2008, 36:2098-2108.
10. Sebold F.D., Fox E. Realized savings from residential conservation activity. The Energy Journal 1985, 6(2):73-88.
11. Wall R., Crosbie T. Potential for reducing electricity demand for lighting in households: an exploratory socio-technical study. Energy Policy 2009, 37(3):1021-1031.
12. West Hill Energy and Computing, Inc., et al., Impact evaluation of the 2005 California Low Income Energy Efficiency Program. Final Report, Prepared for Southern California Edison Company, December 2007.