Public attitudes about tobacco smoke in workplaces: The importance of workers' rights in survey questions

Tobacco Control

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 206-207

  Thomson, G W ^a   Wilson, N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; LAW; LETTER; NEW ZEALAND; TELEPHONE; TOBACCO; WORKPLACE;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; HUMAN RIGHTS; HUMANS; NEW ZEALAND; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; PUBLIC OPINION; TOBACCO SMOKE POLLUTION; WORKPLACE;

EID: 7544236933     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tc.2004.007492     Document Type: Letter

References (8)

1. Muggli M, Forster J, Hurt R, et al. The smoke you don't see: uncovering tobacco industry scientific strategies aimed against environmental tobacco smoke policies. Am J Public Health 2001;91:1419-23.
2. Muggli M, Hurt R, Blanke D. Science for hire: a tobacco industry strategy to influence public opinion on secondhand smoke. Nicotine Tob Res 2003;5:303-14.
3. Wilson N, Thomson G. Still dying from second-hand smoke at work: a brief review of the evidence for smoke-free workplaces in New Zealand. NZ Med J 2002;115(1165):U240.
4. Anon. Smoke-free Environments Amendment Act 2003. New Zealand Government. 2003. http:// www.ndp.govt.nz/smokefreelaw.html.
5. Hill D. A puff in a pub is sacrosanct even among anti-smokers. National Business Review. Auckland, 16 June, 2000:16.
6. UMR Research Ltd. Smoking ban in restaurants, bars and pubs: Omnibus results for National Heart Foundation. Wellington: UMR Research Ltd, April 2003:4.
7. NFO New Zealand. Auahi kore/Smokefree market research report prepared for Health Sponsorship Council. Wellington: NFO New Zealand, April 2003:58,67.
8. Taskforce on passive smoking. Report of the Western Australian Taskforce on passive smoking in public places. Perth: Western Australian Government, 1997:59.