Shifts in the conversation: Teacher-led, peer-led, and computer-mediated discussions

Reading Teacher

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 212-215

  Gambrell, Linda B ^a  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 7544221358     PISSN: 00340561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RT.58.2.9     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Almasi, J.F. (1995). The nature of fourth graders' sociocognitive conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussions of literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 314-351.
2. Almasi, J.F., McKeown, M.G., & Beck, I.L. (1996). The nature of engaged reading in classroom discussions of literature. Journal of Literacy Research, 28, 107-146.
3. Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G., Hamilton, R.L., & Kucan, L. (1997) Questioning the Author: An approach for enhancing student engagement with text. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
4. Cazden, C. (1997). Foreword. In J.R. Paratore & R.L. McCormack (Eds.), Peer talk in the classroom: Learning from research (p. v). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
5. Duke, N.K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 202-224. doi:10.1598/RRQ.35.2.l
6. Evans, K.S. (2002). Fifth-grade students' perceptions of how they experience literature discussion groups. Reading Resesrch Quarterly, 37, 46-69. doi:10.1598/RRQ.37.1.2
7. Flores, M.J. (1990). Computer conferencing: Composing a feminist community of writers. In C. Handa (Ed.), Computers and community: Teaching composition in the twenty-first century (pp. 106-117), Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
8. Gambrell, L.B. (1996). What research reveals about discussion. In LB. Garnbrell & J.F. Almasi (Eds.), Lively discussions! Fostering engaged reading (pp. 25-38). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
9. Horowitz, R., & Freeman, S.H. (1995). Robots versus space-ships: The role of discussion in kindergartners' and second graders' preference for science text. The Reading Teacher, 49, 30-40.
10. Kucan, L., & Beck, I.L. (2003). Inviting students to talk about expository texts: A comparison of two discourse environments and their effects on comprehension. Reading Research and Instruction, 42, 1-29.
11. Maloch, B. (2002). Scaffolding student talk: One teacher's role in literature discussion groups. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 94-114. doi:10.1598/RRQ.37.1.4
12. McMahon, S.I., & Raphael, T.E. (1997). The book club connection: Literacy learning and classroom talk. New York: Teachers College Press.
13. Mercer, N. (1993). Culture, context and the construction of knowledge in the classroom. In P. Light & G. Buttenvorth (Eds.), Context and cognition (pp. 28-46). Hillsdale, Nj: Erlbaum.
14. Scharer, P.L., Peters, D., & Lehman, B.A. (1995). Lessons from grammar school: How can literature use in elementary classrooms inform middle school instruction? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 39, 28-43.
15. Wade, S.E., & Fauske, J.R. (2004). Dialogue online: Prospective teachers' discourse strategies in computer-mediated discussions. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 134-160. doi:10.1598/RRQ.39.2.1
16. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.