A case for single-subject experiments in literacy research

Handbook of Reading Research

Volumn 3, Issue , 2016, Pages 181-194

  Neuman, Susan B ^a   McCormick, Sandra ^b  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 7544220689     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. (1968). Current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91-97
2. Barlow, D. H., & Hayes, S. C. (1979). Alternating treatments design: One strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 199-210
3. Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon
4. Bellack, L., & Chassan, J. B. (1964). An approach to the evaluation of drug effects during psychotherapy: A double-blind study of a single case. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 139, 20-30
5. Bianco, L., & McCormick, S. (1989). Analysis of effects of a reading study skill program for high school learning-disabled students. Journal of Educational Research, 82, 282-288
6. Bisesi, T. L., & Raphael, T. E. (1995). Combining Single-subject designs with qualitative research. In S. B. Neuman & S. McCormick (Eds.), Single-subject experimental research: Applications for literacy (pp. 104--119). Newark, DE: International Reading Association
7. Braithwaite, J. A. (1995). Teachers using single-subject designs in the classroom. In S. B. Neuman & S. McCormick (Eds.), Single-subject experimental research: Applications foriiteracy (pp. 120-136). Newark, DE: International Reading Association
8. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand-McNally
9. Chassan, J. B. (1960). Statistical inference and the single case in clinical design. Psychiatry, 23, 173-184
10. Chassan, J. B. (1967). Research designs in clinical psychology and psychiatry. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts
11. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. i. (1987). Applied behavior analysis. New York: Macmillan
12. Danoff, B., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1993). Incorporating strategy instruction within the writing process in the regular classroom: Effects on the writing of students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 295-322
13. Gurney, D., Gersten, R., Dimino, J., & Carnine, D. (1990). Story grammar: Effective literature instruction for high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 6, 335-342, 348
14. Guza, D. S., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1987). A comparison of daily and weekly testing on student spelling performance. Journal of Educational Research, 80, 373-376
15. Idol, L., & Croll, V. J. (1987). Story-mapping training as a means of improving reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 214-229
16. Johnston, J. M., & Pennypacker, H. S. (1993). Strategies and tactics ofbelulvioral research (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum Associates
17. Kamil, M. L. (1995). Statistical analyses procedures for single-subject designs. In S. B. Neuman & S. McCormick (Eds.), Single-subject experimental research: Applications for literacy (pp. 84-103). Newark, DE: International Reading Association
18. Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press
19. Kratochwill, T. R, & Levin, J. R (Eds.). (1992). Single-case research designs and analysis: New directions for psychology and education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
20. Kucera, J., & Axelrod, S. (1995). Multiple-baseline designs. In S. B. Neuman & S. McCormick (Eds.), Single-subject experimental research: Applications for literacy (pp. 47-63). Newark, DE: International Reading Association
21. Lenz, B. K, & Hughes, C. A. (1990). A word identification strategy for adolescents with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 149-158, 160
22. Levy, A., Wolfgang, C. H., & Koorland, M. A. (1992). Sociodramatic playas a method for enhancing the language performance of kindergarten age students. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 7, 245-262
23. Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K K (1986). Reading disability research: An interactionist perspective. Review of Educational Research, 56, 111-136
24. Marteski, E (1998). Developing student ability to self assess. Doctoral dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
25. McCormick, S. (1995). What is single-subject experimental research? In S. B. Neuman & S. McCormick (Eds.), Single-subject experimental research (pp. 1-31). Newark, DE: International Reading Association
26. McCormick, S., & Cooper, J. O. (1991). Can SQ3R facilitate secondary learning disabled students' literal comprehension of expository text? Reading Psychology, 12, 239-271
27. McReynolds, L., & Thompson, C. (1986). Flexibility of single-subject experimental designs. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 194-203
28. Mudre, L. H., & McCormick, S. (1989). Effects of meaning-focused cues on underachieving readers' context use, self-corrections, and literal comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 89-113
29. Neuman, S. B. (1995). Alternating-treatments designs. In S. B. Neuman & S. McCormick (Eds.), Single-subject experimental research: Applications for literacy (pp. 64-83). Newark, DE: International Reading Association
30. Neuman, S. B., & Gallagher, P. (1994). Joining together in literacy learning: Teenage mothers and children. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 383-401
31. Neuman, S. B., & McCormick, S. (1995). Single-subject experimental research: Applications for literacy. Newark, DE: International Reading Association
32. Newby, R E, Caldwell, J., & Recht, D. (1989). Improving the reading comprehension of children with dysphonetic and dyseidetic dyslexia using story grammar. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 373-379
33. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition & Instruction, 1, 117-175
34. Palincsar, A. S., & Parecki, A. D. (1995). Important issues related to Single-subject experimental research. In S. B. Neuman & S. McCormick (Eds.), Single-subject experimental research: Applications for literacy (pp. 137-150). Newark, DE: International Reading Association
35. Rose, T. L., & Beattie, J. R (1986). Relative effects of teacher-directed and taped previewing on oral reading. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 39-44
36. Schumaker, J. B., Deshler, D. D., Alley, G. R, Warner, M. M., & Denton, P. H. (1982). Multipass: A learning strategy for improving reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, S, 295-311
37. Shapiro, E. S., & McCurdy, B. R (1989). Effects of a taped words treatment on reading proficiency. Exceptional Children, 55, 321-325
38. Shapiro, M. B. (1961). The single case in fundamental clinical psychological research. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 34, 255-263
39. Shapiro, M. B. (1966). The single case in clinical-psychological research. Journal of General Psychology, 74, 3-23
40. Shapiro, M. B., & Ravenette, A. T. (1959). A preliminary experiment of paranoid delusions. Journal of Mental Science, 105, 295-312
41. Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research: Evaluating scientific data in psychologtj. New York: Basic Books
42. Tawney, J., & Gast, D. (1984). Single-subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill
43. Thome, F. C. (1947). The clinical method in science. American Psychologist, 2, 161-166
44. Watson, J. B., & Rayner, R (1920). Conditioned emotional reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 1-14
45. Wixson, K (1993, November). A review of literacy studies using single-subject design. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Austin, TX
46. Wolcott, H. F. (1973). The man in the principal's office: An ethnography. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press
47. Wolf, M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Belulvior Analysis, 11, 203-214
48. Yaden, D. B. (1995). Reversal deSigns. In S. B. Neuman & S. McCormick (Eds.), Single-subject experimental research: Applications jor literacy (pp. 32-46). Newark, DE: International Reading Association