Research in mathematics education and Rasch measurement

Mathematics Education Research Journal

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 1-10

  Callingham, Rosemary ^a   Bond, Trevor G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

^b THE EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 75349110670     PISSN: 10332170     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03217432     Document Type: Editorial

References (8)

1. Adams, R. J. & Khoo, S. T. (1996). Quest: Interactive item analysis [Computer Software]. Melbourne: ACER
2. Bond, T. G. (2004). Validity and assessment: a Rasch measurement perspective. Metodologia de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, 5(2), 179-194
3. Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
4. Bradley, K. D., & Sampson, S. O. (2005). A case for using a Rasch model to assess the qualityof measurement in survey research. The Respondent, 12-13
5. Masters, G. N. (n. d.). Educational measurement. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research
6. Sampson, S., & Bradley, K. D. (2003). Rasch analysis of educator supply and demand rating scale data [Electronic Version], Research Methods Forum. Retrieved July 8, 2005, from http://aom. pace. edu/rmd/2003forum. html
7. Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago: MESA Press
8. Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (2004). Making measures. Chicago: Phaneron Press