|
Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 280-296
|
Why the "widespread agreement" is wrong: contesting the non-harm arguments for the prohibition of full commercial surrogacy.
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MOTHER;
PREGNANCY;
COMMERCE;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
PREGNANCY;
SURROGATE MOTHERS;
|
EID: 75349110369
PISSN: 1320159X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (7)
|
References (0)
|