Body size indexes for optimizing iodine dose for aortic and hepatic enhancement at multidetector CT: Comparison of total body weight, lean body weight, and blood volume

Radiology

Volumn 254, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 163-169

  Kondo, Hiroshi ^a   Kanematsu, Masayuki ^a,b   Goshima, Satoshi ^a   Tomita, Yuhei ^c   Kim, Myeong Jin ^d   Moriyama, Noriyuki ^e   Onozuka, Minoru ^b   Shiratori, Yoshimune ^a   Bae, Kyongtae T ^f  

^a GIFU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b KANAGAWA DENTAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

^c Kizawa Memorial Hospital   (Japan)

^d Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^e NATIONAL CANCER CENTER HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^f UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM; IODINE; IOHEXOL; NONIONIC CONTRAST MEDIUM; CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ABDOMEN; ABDOMINAL AORTA; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD VOLUME; BODY FAT; BODY SIZE; BODY WEIGHT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DRUG DOSE COMPARISON; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEAN BODY WEIGHT; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LIVER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MONITOR; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PORTAL VEIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AORTA DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; LIVER DISEASE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AORTIC DISEASES; BLOOD VOLUME; BODY WEIGHT; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IOHEXOL; LINEAR MODELS; LIVER DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOFTWARE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 75349106404     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.09090369     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Haider MA, Amitai MM, Rappaport DC, et al. Multi-detector row helical CT in preoperative assessment of small (≤ 1.5 cm) liver metastases: is thinner collimation better? Radiology 2002;225:137-142.
2. Yamashita Y, Komohara Y, Takahashi M, et al. Abdominal helical CT: evaluation of optimal doses of intravenous contrast material - a prospective randomized study. Radiology 2000;216:718-723.
3. Awai K, Takada K, Onishi H, Hori S. Aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-value liver contrast: analysis of the effect of different concentrations of contrast material at multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology 2002;224:757-763.
4. Foley WD, Hoffmann RG, Quiroz FA, Kahn CE Jr, Perret RS. Hepatic helical CT: contrast material injection protocol. Radiology 1994;192:367-371.
5. Tublin ME, Tessler FN, Cheng SL, Peters TL, McG overn PC. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT. Radiology 1999;210:97-101.
6. Kanematsu M, Goshima S, Kondo H, et al. Optimizing scan delays of fixed duration contrast injection in contrast-enhanced biphasic multidetector-row CT for the liver and the detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005;29:195-201.
7. Goshima S, Kanematsu M, Kondo H, et al. MDCT of the liver and hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas: optimizing scan delays for bolus-tracking techniques of hepatic arterial and portal venous phases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:W25-W32.
8. Heiken JP, Brink JA, McC lennan BL, Sagel SS, Crowe TM, Gaines MV. Dynamic incremental CT: effect of volume and concentration of contrast material and patient weight on hepatic enhancement. Radiology 1995;195:353-357.
9. Ho LM, Nelson RC, Delong DM. Determining contrast medium dose and rate on basis of lean body weight: does this strategy improve patient-to-patient uniformity of hepatic enhancement during multi-detector row CT? Radiology 2007;243:431-437.
10. Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA. Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. II. Effect of reduced cardiac output in a porcine model. Radiology 1998;207:657-662.
11. Dean PB, Violante MR, Mahoney JA. Hepatic CT contrast enhancement: effect of dose, duration of infusion, and time elapsed following infusion. Invest Radiol 1980;15:158-161.
12. Kormano M, Partanen K, Soimakallio S, Kivimaki T. Dynamic contrast enhancement of the upper abdomen: effect of contrast medium and body weight. Invest Radiol 1983;18:364-367.
13. Berland LL, Lee JY. Comparison of contrast media injection rates and volumes for hepatic dynamic incremented computed tomography. Invest Radiol 1988;23:918-922.
14. Chambers TP, Baron RL, Lush RM. Hepatic CT enhancement. I. Alterations in the volume of contrast material within the same patients. Radiology 1994;193:513-517.
15. Small WC, Nelson RC, Bernardino ME, Brummer LT. Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: effect of different amounts and injection rates of contrast material on early contrast enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:87-92.
16. Platt JF, Reige KA, Ellis JH. Aortic enhancement during abdominal CT angiography: correlation with test injections, flow rates, and patient demographics. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:53-56.
17. Bae KT. Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MR angiography: when does it occur and why? pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model. Radiology 2003;227:809-816.
18. Bae KT, Heiken JP. Scan and contrast administration principles of MDCT. Eur Radiol 2005;15(suppl 5):E46-E59.
19. Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA. Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. I. Prediction with a computer model. Radiology 1998;207:647-655.
20. Kondo H, Kanematsu M, Goshima S, et al. Abdominal multidetector CT in patients with varying body fat percentages: estimation of optimal contrast material dose. Radiology 2008;249:872-877.
21. Fleiss JL. The analysis of variance and multiple comparisons. In: The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York, NY: Wiley, 1986;51-59.
22. Bae KT, Tran HQ, Heiken JP. Multiphasic injection method for uniform prolonged vascular enhancement at CT angiography: pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model. Radiology 2000;216:872-880.