Cloaking of the momentum in acoustic waves

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Sklan, Sophia ^a,b  

^a School of Chemical and Molecular Engineering   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MOMENTUM TRANSPORTS; PRESSURE DIFFERENCES;

ACOUSTIC WAVES; WAVE EQUATIONS;

ACOUSTICS;

EID: 75349100771     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.016606     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. J. B. Pendry, D. Schurig, and D. R. Smith, Science 312, 1780 (2006). 10.1126/science.1125907
2. U. Leonhardt, Science 312, 1777 (2006). 10.1126/science.1126493
3. U. Leonhardt and T. G. Philbin, Prog. Opt. 53, 69 (2009). 10.1016/S0079-6638(08)00202-3
4. Y. G. Ma, C. K. Ong, T. Tyc, and U. Leonhardt, Nature Mater. 8, 639 (2009). 10.1038/nmat2489
5. D. Schurig, J. J. Mock, S. A. Cummer, J. B. Pendry, A. F. Starr, and D. R. Smith, Science 314, 977 (2006). 10.1126/science.1133628
6. R. Lui, C. Ji, J. J. Mock, J. Y. Chin, T. J. Cui, and D. R. Smith, Science 323, 366 (2009). 10.1126/science.1166949
7. J. Valentine, J. Li, T. Zentgraf, G. Bartal, and X. Zhang, Nature Mater. 8, 568 (2009). 10.1038/nmat2461
8. L. H. Gabrielli, J. Cardenas, C. B. Poitras, and M. Lipson, Nat. Photonics 3, 461 (2009). 10.1038/nphoton.2009.117
9. J. H. Lee, J. Blair, V. A. Tamma, Q. Wu, S. J. Rhee, C. J. Summers, and W. Park, Opt. Express 17, 12922 (2009). 10.1364/OE.17.012922
10. I. I. Smolyaninov, V. N. Smolyaninova, A. V. Kildishev, and V. M. Shalaev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 213901 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.213901
11. A. Greenleaf, M. Lassas, and G. Uhlmann, Math. Res. Lett. 10, 685 (2003).
12. A. Greenleaf, M. Lassas, and G. Uhlmann, Physiol. Meas. 24, 413 (2003). 10.1088/0967-3334/24/2/353
13. S. Zhang, D. A. Genov, C. Sun, and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 123002 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.123002
14. G. W. Milton, M. Briane, and J. R. Willis, New J. Phys. 8, 248 (2006). 10.1088/1367-2630/8/10/248
15. S. A. Cummer and D. Schurig, New J. Phys. 9, 45 (2007). 10.1088/1367-2630/9/3/045
16. H. Chen and C. T. Chan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 183518 (2007). 10.1063/1.2803315
17. S. A. Cummer, B.-I. Popa, D. Schurig, D. R. Smith, J. Pendry, M. Rahm, and A. Starr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 024301 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100. 024301
18. M. Farhat, S. Enoch, S. Guenneau, and A. B. Movchan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 134501 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.134501
19. H. Chen, J. Yanh, J. Zi, and C. T. Chan, EPL 85, 24004 (2009). 10.1209/0295-5075/85/24004
20. The most obvious case where the velocity would obey the wave equation is the case of constant ρ and λ with the property of irrotational flow, i.e. × v 0 [this property is a direct result of the linearized flow approximation used in deriving Eqs.]. With these constraints and the vector calculus identity (A) = 2 A - × (× A), the wave equation is recovered.
21. M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions (National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., 1972).
22. R. Weder, J. Phys. A 41, 065207 (2008). 10.1088/1751-8113/41/6/065207
23. R. Weder, J. Phys. A 41, 415401 (2008). 10.1088/1751-8113/41/41/415401
24. Z. Ruan, M. Yan, C. W. Neff, and M. Qiu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 113903 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.113903
25. H. Chen, B.-I. Wu, B. Zhang, and J. A. Kong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 063903 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.063903
26. C. W. Qiu, L.-W. Li, T.-S. Yeo, and S. Zouhdi, Phys. Rev. E 75, 026609 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.026609