A Legal Defense for Compensating Research Egg Donors

Cell Stem Cell

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 99-102

  Crockin, Susan L ^a  

^a Crockin Law and Policy Group   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EMBRYO RESEARCH; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; FEE; HUMAN; LAW; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OOCYTE DONATION; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THEORY;

EID: 75349098735     PISSN: 19345909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.01.010     Document Type: Note

References (17)

1. Chong S., and Normile D. Science 311 (2006) 22-25
2. Cibelli J. Cell Stem Cell 5 (2009) 345-346
3. Commonwealth v. Edelin, 371 Mass. 497 (1976).
4. Crockin S.L., and Jones H.W. (2010), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD pp. 352-354
5. Flynn v. Holder, USDC CA (filed Oct. 2009).
6. Grady C. J. Clin. Invest. 115 (2005) 1681-1687
7. Hutt L.E. Health Law Rev. 12 (2003) 16-21
8. Hyun I. Nature 442 (2006) 629-630
9. Klitzman R., and Sauer M.V. Reprod. Biomed. Online 18 (2009) 603-608
10. Lifchez v. Hartigan, 735 F. Supp.1361 (IL. 1990).
11. Massachusetts General Laws ch. 111L (2005).
12. National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA), 42 U.S.C. Sec. 274e, 301 (1984).
13. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, and Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Fertil. Steril. 86 (2006) S38-S50
14. Roe v. Wade, 410 US 113 (1973).
15. The Ethics Committee Of The American Society For Reproductive Medicine (ASRM). Fertil. Steril. 88 (2007) 305-309
16. Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (UAGA) (1968; rev. 1987, 2006).
17. Vogel G. Science 313 (2006) 155