Unbiased ROI selection in neuroimaging studies of individual differences

NeuroImage

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 184-189

  Viviani, Roberto ^a,b  

^a ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COVARIANCE; GENDER; NEUROIMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STUDENT T TEST; TASK PERFORMANCE;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 75249104589     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.085     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Barrett L.F. Understanding the mind by measuring the brain. Lessons from measuring behaviour (Commentary on Vul et al., 2009). Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 4 (2009) 314-318
2. Diggle P.J., Heagerty P., Liang K.Y., and Zeger S.L. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. 2nd ed. (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford
3. Draper N.R., and Smith H. Applied Regression Analysis. 3rd ed. (1998), John Wiley & Sons, New York
4. Friston K.J., Rothstein P., Geng J.J., Sterzer P., and Henson R.N. A critique of functional localizers. NeuroImage 30 (2006) 1077-1087
5. Kriegeskorte N., Simmons W.K., Bellgowan P.S.F., and Baker C.I. Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: The dangers of double dipping. Nat. Neurosci. 12 (2009) 535-540
6. Lazar N.A. Discussion of "Puzzingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition" by Vul et al. (2009). Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 4 (2009) 308-309
7. Lieberman M.D., Berkman E.T., and Wager T.D. Correlations in social neuroscience aren't voodoo. Commentary on Vul et al. (2009). Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 4 (2009) 299-307
8. Lindquist M.A., and Gelman A. Correlations and multiple comparisons in functional imaging. A statistical perspective (commentary on Vul et al. 2009). Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 4 (2009) 310-313
9. McCulloch C.E., and Searle S.R. Generalized (2001), Linear, and Mixed Models. Wiley, New York
10. Nichols T.E., and Poline J.B. Commentary on Vul et al.'s (2009) "Puzzingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition". Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 4 (2009) 291-293
11. Penny W.D., and Holmes A.J. Random effects analysis. In: Friston K.J., Ashburner J.T., Kiebel S.J., Nichols T.E., and Penny W.D. (Eds). Statistical Parametric Mapping: The Analysis of Functional Brain Images (2007), Academic Press, London
12. Saxe R., Brett M., and Kanwisher N. Divide and conquer: a defense of functional localizers. NeuroImage 30 (2006) 1088-1096
13. Vul E., Harris C., Winkielman P., and Pashler H. Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 4 (2009) 274-290
14. Yarkoni T. Big correlations in little studies. Inflated fMRI correlations reflect low statistical power. Commentary on Vul et al. (2009). Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 4 (2009) 294-298