The impact of instructor immediacy and presence for online student affective learning, cognition, and motivation

Journal of Educators Online

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-30

  Baker, Credence ^a  

^a TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 75249103319     PISSN: 1547500X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.9743/JEO.2010.1.2     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2008). Staying the course: Online education in the United States. The Sloan Consortium. Retrieved January 2, 2008, from http://www.sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/pdf/staying_the_course.pdf
2. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17.
3. Arbaugh, J.B. (2007). An empirical verification of the community of inquiry framework. Sloan-C View, 11(1), 2-12.
4. Arbaugh, J. B. (2001). How instructor immediacy behaviors affect student satisfaction and learning in web-based courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(4), 42-54.
5. Arbaugh, J. B., & Hwang, A. (2006). Does "teaching presence" exist in online MBA courses? The Internet and Higher Education, 9(1), 9-21.
6. Baker, J. D. (2001). The effects of instructor immediacy and student cohesiveness on affective and cognitive learning in the online classroom education (Doctoral dissertation, Regent University, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62, 2081.
7. Baker, J. D. (2004). An investigation of relationships among instructor immediacy and affective and cognitive learning in the online classroom. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 1-13.
8. Benson, A. D. (2003). Assessing participant learning in online environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 100, 69-78.
9. Berge, Z. L. (1995). Facilitating computer conferencing: Recommendations from the field. Educational Technology, 35(1), 22-30.
10. Blignaut, S., & Trollip, S. R. (2003). Developing a taxonomy of faculty participation in asynchronous learning environments-an exploratory investigation. Computer and Education, 41, 149-171.
11. Chesebro, J. L., & McCroskey, J. C. (2000). The relationship between students' reports of learning and their actual recall of lecture material. Communication Education, 49, 297-301.
12. Christensen, L. J., & Menzel, K. E. (1998). The linear relationship between student reports of teacher immediacy behaviors and perceptions of state motivation, and of cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning. Communication Education, 47, 82-90.
13. Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationship among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340.
14. Du, J., Havard, B., & Li, H. (2005). Dynamic online discussion: Task-oriented interaction for deep learning. Educational Media International, 42(3), 207-218.
15. Frymier, A.B. (1994). A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42, 133-144.
16. Gall, M.D., Borg, W.R., and Gall, J.P. (1996). Educational research (sixth edition). White Plains, NY: Longman Publishers.
17. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
18. Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148.
19. Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37, 40-53.
20. Graham, J. W., Cumsille, P. E., & Elek-Fisk, E. (2003). Methods for handling missing data. In J. A. Schinka & W. F. Velicer (Vol. Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Volume 2. Research methods in psychology. New York: Wiley.
21. Grandzol, J., & Grandzol, C. (2006). Best practices for online business education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7(1).
22. Hiltz, R., Zhang, Y., & Tuross, M. (2002). Studies of effectiveness of learning networks. Elements of Quality Online Education: Volume 3 in the Sloan-C Series.
23. Needham, MA., Jensen, K. K. (1999). Training teachers to use verbal immediacy. Communication Research Reports, 16(3), 223-232.
24. Johnson, S. D., Aragon, S. R., Shaik, N., & Palma-Rivas, N. (2000). Comparative analysis of leaner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(1), 29-49.
25. Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., & Wendt-Wasco, N. J. (1985). Teacher immediacy for affective learning in divergent college classes. Communication Quarterly, 33(1), 61-74.
26. Lam, P., Cheng, K. F., & McNaught, C. (2005). Asynchronous online discussion: Empirical evidence on quantity and quality. In G. Richards & P. Kommers (Eds.), ED-MEDIA 2005 (pp. 3209-3215). Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education.
27. Lemak, D., Shin, S., Reed, R., & Montgomery, J. (2005). Technology, transactional distance, and instructor effectiveness: An empirical investigation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 150-158.
28. McAlister, G. (2001). Computer-mediated immediacy: A new construct in teacher-student communication for computer-mediated distance education (Doctoral dissertation, Regent University, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62, 2731.
29. McCroskey, J. C. (2006). Reliability and validity of the Generalized Attitude Measure and Generalized Belief Measure. Communication Quarterly, 54, 265-274.
30. McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (1985). Power in the classroom: Behavior alteration techniques, communication training and learning. Communication Education, 34, 214-226.
31. McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., & Bennett, V. (2006). The relationship of student end-of-class motivation with teacher communication behaviors and instructional outcomes. Communication Education, 55(4), 403-414.
32. McCroskey, J. C., Sallinen, A., Fayer, J. M., Richmond, V. P., & Barraclough R. A. (1996). Nonverbal immediacy and cognitive learning: A cross-cultural investigation. Communication Education, 45, 200-211.
33. McLaren, C. H. (2004). A comparison of student persistence and performance in online and classroom business statistics experiences. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 2(1), 1-10.
34. Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent messages. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
35. Moore, M. (1973). Toward a theory of independent learning and teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 44(12), 661-679.
36. Moore, M. (1973). Toward a theory of independent learning and teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 44(12), 661-679.
37. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
38. Ni, S. (2004). Teacher verbal immediacy and sense of classroom community in online classes: Satisfaction, perceived learning, and online discussion (Doctoral dissertation), The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas. Retrieved October 9, 2007, from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (Publication No. AAT 3185200)
39. Nippard, E., & Murphy, E. (2007). Social presence in the web-based synchronous secondary classroom. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 33(1)
40. O'Sullivan, P. B., Hunt, S. K., & Lippert, L. R. (2004). Mediated immediacy: A language of affiliation in a technological age. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23(4), 464-490.
41. O'Sullivan, P. B., Hunt, S., Lippert, L., Owens, S., & Whyte, A. (2001, November). Mediated immediacy: Affiliation at distance in educational contexts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Atlanta, GA.
42. Pelowski, S., Frissell, L., Cabral, K., & Yu, T. (2005). So far but yet so close: Student chat room immediacy, learning, and performance in an online course. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16, 395-407.
43. Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21-40.
44. Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J. S., & McCroskey, J. C. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook, 10, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
45. Richardson, J. & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68-88.
46. Robinson, R. Y., & Richmond, V. P. (1995). Validity of the verbal immediacy scale. Communication Research Reports, 12, 80-84.
47. Rodriguez, J., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (1996). Clarifying the relationship between teacher nonverbal immediacy and student cognitive learning: Affective learning as the central causal mediator. Communication Education, 45, 293-305.
48. Rubin, R. B., Sypher, H. E., & Palmgreen, P. (2004). Communication research measures: A sourcebook. New York: Routledge.
49. Russo, T., & Benson, S. (2005). Learning with invisible others: Perceptions of online presence and their relationship to cognitive and affective learning. Educational Technology & Society, 8 (1), 54-62.
50. Sanders, J. A., & Wiseman, R. L. (1990). The effects of verbal and nonverbal teacher immediacy on perceived cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning in the multicultural classroom. Communication Education, 39, 341-353.
51. Sargeant, J., Curran, V., Allen, M., Jarvis-Selinger, S., & Ho, K. (2006). Facilitating interpersonal interaction and learning online: Linking theory and practice. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26, 128-136.
52. Schulman, A. H., & Sims, R. L. (1999). Learning in an online format versus an in class format: An experimental study. The Higher Education Journal, 26(11), 54-56.
53. Shea, P., Li, C. S., & Pickett, A. (2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(3),175-190.
54. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: Wiley.
55. Sidelinger, R. J., & McCroskey, J. C. (1997). Communication correlates of teacher clarity in the college classroom. Communication Research Reports, 14(1), 1-10.
56. Stein, D. S., Wanstreet, C. E., Calvin, J., Overoom, C., & Wheaton, J. E. (2005). Bridging the transactional distance gap in online learning environments. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 105-118.
57. Styer, A. J. (2007). A grounded meta-analysis of adult learner motivation in online learning from the perspective of the learner (Doctoral dissertation), Capella University, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Retrieved March 28, 2008, from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (Publication No. AAT 3249903)
58. Swan, K. (2002). Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction. Education, Communications, & Information, 2(1), 23-49.
59. Swan, K. (2003). Learning effectiveness: What the research tells us. In J. Bourne & J.C. Moore (Eds), Elements of quality online education, practice and direction (pp. 13-45). Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education.
60. Tello, S. F. (2002). An analysis of the relationship between instructional interaction and student persistence in online education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Lowell.
61. Teven, J., & McCroskey, J. (1996, November). The relationship of perceived teacher caring with student learning and teacher evaluation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association. San Diego, CA.
62. Tu, C. H. (2005). From presentation to interaction: New goals for online learning. Educational Media International, 42(3), 189-206.
63. Vroeginday, B. J. (2005). Traditional vs. online education: A comparative analysis of learner outcomes (Doctoral dissertation, Fielding Graduate University, 2005). Dissertation Abstracts International, 66, 10A.
64. Walther, J.B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52-90.
65. Wantstreet, C. E. (2006). Interactions in online learning environments. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7(4), 399-411.
66. Whyte, A., O'Sullivan, P. B., & Hunt, S. (2003, May). Double strangeness: Anxiety and uncertainty in web-based instruction. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, San Diego, CA.
67. Wise, A., Chang, J., Duffy, T. & del Valle, R. (2004). The effects of teacher social presence on student satisfaction, engagement, and learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(3), 247-271.
68. Witt, P. L., Wheeless, L. R., & Allen, M. (2004). A meta-analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Monographs, 71(2), 184-207.